Another Reason Why The Only Good Conservative Is A Dead Conservative

[cowboy8055]

Originally Posted by Doove

No, you're right, you're not suggesting it. Bad choice of words. That would require me to give you enough credit to be able to actually follow through to the logical conclusion of what you're saying.

You are the master of spin.
You must live in a perpetual state of dizziness.

[Guest072323]

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doofe
And one thing i always tell my conservative/libertarian free market capitalists is, if you can convince me that capitalism doesn't have the existence of poor people built into it as a requirement for its ability to function properly, then maybe i'll come around to your way of thinking - which is to insist that every poor person is poor for no other reason than their being a lazy ass.

Not only am i still waiting for someone to accomplish that, i've yet to have anyone even make the attempt.

Originally Posted by amishgangster

Thats because that is one of the dumbest thoughts any human has ever had.

You usually get things right AG.... but you're wrong on this one......
THIS is the dumbest thought that any human has ever had.

Originally Posted by Dooche

Oh brother. The whole point is that liberals judge people based on their ideas and actions. Don't expect any apologies for that, because none are forthcoming nor necessary. What we don't do is we don't judge people based on the color of their skin. Or their sexual orientation. Or what country they happened to be born in. Or whether or not they have a penis between their legs.

You really want to own that???

[Guest042416]

Originally Posted by bobmidnight

Doove remind me again which system didn't have poor people. Of course there are poor people in any system. Question for you though, what has lifted more people out of poverty than anything else in the history of the world? I'll give you a hint, it's not a UN program. Also I would never say that all poor people are lazy, my point is only that the system subsidizes laziness.

also greed, rich people getting kick backs and rich companies getting free money from the government.
Many many issues up at the top.
Lets not even go with the banks and the bailout.
I love how its always against the poor, look at the rich and all the greed and the money they get and how they expect their children to get everything handed to them.

on we go
the middle class suffers always has always will

[Guest070916]

Originally Posted by bjwstw

Lets not even go with the banks and the bailout.

the middle class suffers always has always will

Today here is just another example of Republicans being nothing more than whores of Big Banker Interests, who prefer to keep sticking it to students any which way these greedy banking bastards can!!!

Senate Republicans Block Student Loan Bill

Senate Republicans on Wednesday blocked legislation aimed at letting people refinance their student loans at lower rates, a pre-ordained outcome that gave Democrats a fresh election-year talking point against the GOP.

[Doove]

Originally Posted by Paulwantsya

You really want to own that???

Ok, you're right. I do judge you - but mostly on what's pretty obvious.

But in the context of my entire comment that you quoted, yeah, i'll own it.

[AmishGangster]

Liberals...geesh

[Plastic Man]

Originally Posted by Doove

Ok, you're right. I do judge you - but mostly on what's pretty obvious.

But in the context of my entire comment that you quoted, yeah, i'll own it.

even in the kiddie pool ...you waaaay over your head

[Guest070916]

Originally Posted by offshoredrilling

remember
Reagen was a Kennedy democrat

Indeed and he led a labor union before that!

Then as Reagan aged and lost his mind he went conservative.....

[Guest070916]

Originally Posted by JONBALLS

actually yes , your that boring

take it as a simple reality check or continue on being out of touch

LMAO!!!
Actually you come across as being as out of touch as that tea-bagging twit Eric Cantor who just had his sorry arse handed to him by another tea-bagging twit who is more bat shit crazy than Cantor!

Eric Cantor in true Republican cocky fashion outspent Dave Brat 40 to 1, about 5 million to Brat's less than 200,000 dollars and out of touch Cantor still lost!

A devastating defeat for the tea-bagging goof who was setting himself up to replace Johnny Boner! A shocked and despondent Cantor was heard whining, "What is the Republican party coming to when it can't buy an election anymore???"......

[Doove]

Originally Posted by Plastic Man

even in the kiddie pool ...you waaaay over your head

Ok.

[clearlylost]

everything free in A-me-ri-ca!!

[Plastic Man]

Originally Posted by Doove

Ok.

community college?

[The Drummer]

Originally Posted by drluv1

if private sector employees were held accountable, there would be no cost overruns, in regard to government contracts. The whole point is that we contract for defense services in a non free market way. I would call it socialism. I really don't think the gov, "sucks" at providing services.But if you believe that, then wouldn't the defense dept be included in that and given it's large budget be the best way to to look for wast and better ways to provide for defense. Please explain the statement, " The government begins to lose money, no problem, just pass it on to the tax payer".

I think you WAY overstate the notion that people in business are held accountable. Why don't we have a revolving door of CEO's at the major car companies every 3 months after another recall? It took months for the target CEO to resign, not get fired. To quote an analyst who thought the change should have happened earlier," I think it reflects the slow moving nature of that is inherent in target's culture". I still haven't heard of any heads rolling at Ebay after their recent security breach. Having spent 25 yrs in the business world, I'm inclined to believe the Hunter S. Thompson quote, " The truth is rarely told during the 9 to5 business hours".

All good points, drl.

What I meant was that if the government needs more money for things due to mismanagement it would result in higher taxes more often than not. But Doove also makes a good point in his response to my post.

[The Drummer]

Originally Posted by Doove

While i won't concede your claim in the first sentence above, i will at least say that i do agree with your prior comment in this thread, to an extent. But then, i think we're all smart enough to where there's at least a shred of truth in pretty much everything we choose to believe. So with that, i'll also agree with drluv in that i think you overstate the gap.

Call it a price increase and we all accept it as a normal part of living in a capitalistic society. But call it a tax increase, and sit back and watch the outrage. But the reality is, they're literally one and the same. And i would suggest that they both occur with the same regularity. So the idea that government can just raise taxes while businesses can't (raise prices) isn't something i'm inclined to buy into.

Thanks for the insight, Doove.

[JONBALLS]

Originally Posted by Celso

LMAO!!!
Actually you come across as being as out of touch as that tea-bagging twit Eric Cantor who just had his sorry arse handed to him by another tea-bagging twit who is more bat shit crazy than Cantor!

Eric Cantor in true Republican cocky fashion outspent Dave Brat 40 to 1, about 5 million to Brat's less than 200,000 dollars and out of touch Cantor still lost!

A devastating defeat for the tea-bagging goof who was setting himself up to replace Johnny Boner! A shocked and despondent Cantor was heard whining, "What is the Republican party coming to when it can't buy an election anymore???"......

yes , your that boring

then you continue to double, triple , and quadroople DOWN on it to proove my point .. thanks



you sound like a frothing lunatic also which makes me laugh cause i got you there also ,, thanks again