Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 650
MoneyManMatt 491
Jon Bon 408
samcruz 400
Still Looking 399
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
George Spelvin 351
Starscream66 318
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
sharkman29 270
Top Posters
biomed171997
DallasRain71680
Yssup Rider64488
gman4456303
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling51027
WTF48272
bambino48236
pyramider46457
The_Waco_Kid42155
Dr-epg40674
CryptKicker37477
Mokoa36518
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-06-2026, 09:26 PM   #31
The_Waco_Kid
BANNED
 
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: The MAGA Zone
Posts: 42,155
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacuzzme View Post
This new guy is a straight up wackjob. Sad state of affairs when these two fruitcakes are the best dems in Dallas can come up with.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider View Post
You’re talking about Cornyn and Paxton right?

What do YOU know bout Texas politics, pard?

No. he's talking about two Democrat Senate candidates one of which despite being raised in an affluent family and attending private school who has a tendency to slip into "ghetto speak" to "appeal to" what she thinks are uneducated blacks who actually wouldn't be offended by such blatant racial blather and some guy who thinks there are 6 sexes and that "God is non-binary".


if this is the vanguard of the Blue wave in Texas then Texas gonna stay Red for generations to come.
The_Waco_Kid is offline   Quote
Old 03-07-2026, 07:02 AM   #32
Jacuzzme
Valued Poster
 
Jacuzzme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 16, 2016
Location: Steel City
Posts: 10,232
Encounters: 52
Default

That guy has zero chance of winning a statewide election in Texas. Does anyone actually believe that people in Texas, of all places, are going to elect the “God is nonbinary” guy? If this kind of nutjob is what dems think will win elections, republicans just might avoid the usually unavoidable ass whooping the party in power inevitably takes in an off year election.

In a debate between him and Crockett, SHE’S the one who comes off closer to sanity, which is a gargantuan task.
Jacuzzme is offline   Quote
Old 03-07-2026, 10:14 AM   #33
Turner2099
Premium Access
 
Join Date: Dec 7, 2025
Location: Houston
Posts: 267
Encounters: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacuzzme View Post
That guy has zero chance of winning a statewide election in Texas. Does anyone actually believe that people in Texas, of all places, are going to elect the “God is nonbinary” guy? If this kind of nutjob is what dems think will win elections, republicans just might avoid the usually unavoidable ass whooping the party in power inevitably takes in an off year election.

In a debate between him and Crockett, SHE’S the one who comes off closer to sanity, which is a gargantuan task.
If Talarico has no chance of winning, why did Republicans go through the effort of putting together a poll to convince Crockett to run? Even Mike Johnson was psyched she joined the race.
Turner2099 is offline   Quote
Old 03-07-2026, 11:44 AM   #34
Turner2099
Premium Access
 
Join Date: Dec 7, 2025
Location: Houston
Posts: 267
Encounters: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turner2099 View Post
If Talarico has no chance of winning, why did Republicans go through the effort of putting together a poll to convince Crockett to run? Even Mike Johnson was psyched she joined the race.
The last time there wasn't a President on the ticket in Texas, the voter turnout was 8,102,908.

The latest estimate of voter breakout in Texas is as follows:

Total Registered Voters: 16,630,174

Democrats: 7,901,734 (47.51%)
Republicans: 6,217,550 (37.39%)
Unaffiliated: 2,510,890 (15.10%)

While a reocord number of Hispanics voted for Trump in 2024, Latino sentiment towards Republicans may be shifting. Multiple Latino-majority counties had more people cast Democrat votes in the latest primary than voted for Harris in 2024.

Independents may very well determine election outcomes in Texas in general.

Paxton was impeached by his own party and is refusing to drop out of the runoff race if Trump endorses Cornyn unless the Senate passes the SAVE Act and abolishes the filibuster.

Talarico definitely has a chance of winning, especially if he's running against Paxton.

https://ivn.us/posts/texas-primary-s...ans-2026-03-04
https://www.sos.state.tx.us/election...al/70-92.shtml
https://www.google.com/search?q=did+...-8#lfId=ChxjMe
https://www.google.com/search?q=did+...-8#lfId=ChxjMe
https://www.politico.com/news/2026/0...arico-00812807
[/quote]
Turner2099 is offline   Quote
Old 03-07-2026, 01:24 PM   #35
Tiny
Enano Poderoso
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 10,042
Encounters: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rooster View Post
I do not. I only agree with Post #15.

.
I do not agree with you or Post #15. I have re-evaluated my belief that that Jasmine Crockett is bat shit crazy (bsc), because of TxDot's post #26. I no longer believe she is bsc. Rather, like Trump, she believes if she makes bogus claims of election fraud, some people will believe her. And that will make her base angry and shore up her support.

Anyway, I don't think she's that attractive. Furthermore, women who are bat shit crazy usually are outstanding in bad. As such I'd far prefer to bang Ilhan Omar or Alexandria Ocasio Cortez. Not only are they bsc, Ilhan has that cute accent and angelic face. Alexandria is a firebrand and the way she dances just says "Please come fuck me."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aw12JW77fV4 (Credit to The Waco Kid, I believe he was the first to post this link.)

Quote:
Originally Posted by txdot-guy View Post
Texas republicans have been rigging elections in Texas for quite some time. Where “rigging” means putting their thumb on the scales, not to mean picking a winner.

I am sure that this isn’t a new phenomenon and I am sure it’s not specific to republicans but rather the party in power in each particular state.

There are a variety of tactics that are used including the placement and hours of polling places.

Redistricting which disadvantages certain candidates.

Removing polling stations from college campuses.

The timing of special elections to limit voter turnout.

Having a judge retire in such a way as to create a special election rather than a general election.

Etc. Etc.

Calling out the actions of the people in charge of the election and how it can affect voter turnout and disenfranchisement is certainly the right thing to do.
You're right about the gerrymandering. But that's something Democrats have done a lot better than the Republicans, at least at the federal level. They've managed to get more than their fair share of Congressional seats most of the time since at least Truman. Furthermore the Democrats will probably come out on top in the redistricting game this year. California may now be more heavily gerrymandered than Texas. Virginia is looking at going really medieval, in a way that would cut representation from 6 Democrats and 5 Republicans to 10 Democrats and 1 Republican.

Otherwise claims that Republican moves to "restrict voting" will hurt Democrats in Texas are bogus, certainly for 2026. Some of the changes are designed to save money. And IF they do make voting harder, it will work to Democrats' advantage. Here's the ratio of Republican to Democratic Primary voters in each election going back to 2010, according to ChatGPT.

2010 2.2:1
2012 2.5:1
2014 2.4:1
2016 2.0:1
2018 1.5:1
2020 1.0:1
2022 1.9:1
2024 1.6:1
2026 estimate 0.96:1

Please note that during the Trump era, from 2018 forward, Democrats were more engaged than they were before Trump. Democrats are mad as hell this year, as reflected in marginally more Democrats showing up to vote in the primaries than Republicans. If you did have to jump through hoops to go vote (and you don't -- that's just propaganda spread by the Democratic Party and Democrat-backed MSM) then the Democrat is more likely to jump.

Perhaps you could help me understand this. Is the argument that many Democrats are too lazy or uninterested to go to the effort to vote so you have to hand it to them on a silver platter? I sure don't believe that. Many Democrats appear to though if you take them at face value.

I note that Turner believes there are a lot more Democrat voters in Texas than Republican voters, which isn't reflected in the numbers above. I didn't look at his links, but don't believe his numbers. They don't agree with actual election results or the number of people voting in the primaries.
Tiny is offline   Quote
Old 03-07-2026, 01:44 PM   #36
Jacuzzme
Valued Poster
 
Jacuzzme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 16, 2016
Location: Steel City
Posts: 10,232
Encounters: 52
Default

Dems have been trying, and failing, to win a Texas senate seat for like 40 years. The current nutter isn’t going to break that cycle, that will take a Texas version of Manchin or Fetterman. Talarico is far from that, he makes Mao look like Joe McCarthy.
Jacuzzme is offline   Quote
Old 03-07-2026, 02:45 PM   #37
Yssup Rider
Valued Poster
 
Yssup Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 64,488
Encounters: 71
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacuzzme View Post
Dems have been trying, and failing, to win a Texas senate seat for like 40 years. The current nutter isn’t going to break that cycle, that will take a Texas version of Manchin or Fetterman. Talarico is far from that, he makes Mao look like Joe McCarthy.
That's horse shit.
Yssup Rider is offline   Quote
Old 03-07-2026, 03:59 PM   #38
Turner2099
Premium Access
 
Join Date: Dec 7, 2025
Location: Houston
Posts: 267
Encounters: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiny View Post

You're right about the gerrymandering. But that's something Democrats have done a lot better than the Republicans, at least at the federal level. They've managed to get more than their fair share of Congressional seats most of the time since at least Truman. Furthermore the Democrats will probably come out on top in the redistricting game this year. California may now be more heavily gerrymandered than Texas. Virginia is looking at going really medieval, in a way that would cut representation from 6 Democrats and 5 Republicans to 10 Democrats and 1 Republican.

Otherwise claims that Republican moves to "restrict voting" will hurt Democrats in Texas are bogus, certainly for 2026. Some of the changes are designed to save money. And IF they do make voting harder, it will work to Democrats' advantage. Here's the ratio of Republican to Democratic Primary voters in each election going back to 2010, according to ChatGPT.

2010 2.2:1
2012 2.5:1
2014 2.4:1
2016 2.0:1
2018 1.5:1
2020 1.0:1
2022 1.9:1
2024 1.6:1
2026 estimate 0.96:1

Please note that during the Trump era, from 2018 forward, Democrats were more engaged than they were before Trump. Democrats are mad as hell this year, as reflected in marginally more Democrats showing up to vote in the primaries than Republicans. If you did have to jump through hoops to go vote (and you don't -- that's just propaganda spread by the Democratic Party and Democrat-backed MSM) then the Democrat is more likely to jump.

Perhaps you could help me understand this. Is the argument that many Democrats are too lazy or uninterested to go to the effort to vote so you have to hand it to them on a silver platter? I sure don't believe that. Many Democrats appear to though if you take them at face value.

I note that Turner believes there are a lot more Democrat voters in Texas than Republican voters, which isn't reflected in the numbers above. I didn't look at his links, but don't believe his numbers. They don't agree with actual election results or the number of people voting in the primaries.
I was out picking up lawn fertilizer when it hit me that I wrote about Texas Independent voters incorrectly in the post referenced above. I should have said only Presidential and US Senate elections may very well be determined by Independent voters. Texas is one of the states completely gerrymandered by Republicans, so US Representatives, State Senators, and State Representatives will remain largely Republican.

According to ChatGPT, in Texas, Democrat votes increased from 2016 to 2020, but fell from 2020 to 2024.

Texas Presidential Vote Share (Democrats)
Election Year Democratic Candidate Democratic Vote % Votes
2016 Hillary Clinton ≈43.2–43.3% ~3.87 million
2020 Joe Biden ≈46.4–46.5% ~5.21 million
2024 Kamala Harris ≈42.4% ~4.81 million

Here’s how the Republican share of the vote in Texas presidential elections compares across 2016, 2020, and 2024. Republican engagement increased each year.

Year Republican Candidate Republican Vote % (Texas) Votes
2016 Donald Trump ≈52.2% ~4.68 million
2020 Donald Trump ≈52.2% ~5.86 million
2024 Donald Trump ≈56.2% ~6.38 million

At a national level, according to ChatGPT, Democrats also voted more in 2020 than 2016, but voted less in 2024. Had they turned out to vote in the same numbers as 2020, Trump would have lost at least the popular vote.

According to ChatGPT here’s how the Democratic share of the national popular vote compares across the 2016, 2020, and 2024 U.S. presidential elections.

Year Democratic Candidate Democratic Vote % (U.S.) Votes
2016 Hillary Clinton 48.2% ~65.9 million
2020 Joe Biden 51.3% ~81.3 million
2024 Kamala Harris ≈48.3% ~75.0 million

In contrast to Democrats, Republican engagement increased from 2016 in the 2020 and then again in the 2024 elections.

Here is how the Republican share of the national popular vote compares across the same presidential elections you asked about.

Year Republican Candidate Republican Vote % (U.S.) Votes
2016 Donald Trump ≈46.1% ~63.0 million
2020 Donald Trump ≈46.8% ~74.2 million
2024 Donald Trump ≈49.8% ~77.3 million

According to ChatGPT, the breakdown of voters in Texas by Democrat, Republican, and Unaffiliated is as follows:

As of early 2026, estimates of Texas voters by party affiliation look roughly like this:

Party
Affiliation Voters Percentage
Democratic ~8,133,683 46.5%
Republican ~6,601,189 37.8%
Unaffiliated ~2,750,830 15.7%
Total
registered voter ~17.5 million 100%

As to why fewer Democrats vote than Republicans, ChatGPT list multiple reasons, ranging from Republican voters averaging older while older voters tend to vote more, to political competitiveness, when some voters don't turnout to vote because they feel the outcome is predictable, so their votes won't matter. Gerrymandering certainly supports this idea.

As noted above, the ratio of Republicans to Democrats voting in the 2026 primaries decreased by 40%, which is substantial. This does not mean a guaranteed Democrat win, but does indicate a great deal more engagement by Democrats than in previous years. Recent perception of Republicans making voting more difficult for Democrats after the changes made in March 2026 may increase this engagement in November.

ChatGPT also confirms that multiple Latino-majority counties had more Democrats vote during the recent primary than voted for Harris in 2024, which may to be a good indication that Hispanic sentiment is shifting back to Democrat from the increased Republican leaning from 2020 to 2024.

Independent voters very well may be key in November. According to ChatGPT, there's no data for the average age of unaffiliated voters in Texas, but at the National level, independents skew younger, particularly among Millennials and Gen Z.

Millennials tend to favor Democrats on climate change, healthcare, and social issues, but Republicans get more support on economy, small business, and taxes from some subgroups.

Gen Z is more socially liberal than Millennials on issues like LGBTQ+ rights, racial justice, and climate policy, but economic concerns and a more skeptical attitude toward government sometimes push some Gen Z voters toward Republicans or libertarian-leaning independents.

According to ChatGPT, Independent voters as of early March 2026 generally:

--View the economy as challenging or problematic, especially in terms of inflation and cost of living.

--Rate personal finances more negatively than many Republican voters.

--Are skeptical of claims that the economy is booming, even if some foresee moderate growth ahead.

--Care deeply about economic issues when deciding how to vote, making economic messaging critical for candidates seeking their support.

We will just have to see what happens in November.
Turner2099 is offline   Quote
Old 03-07-2026, 05:18 PM   #39
Jacuzzme
Valued Poster
 
Jacuzzme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 16, 2016
Location: Steel City
Posts: 10,232
Encounters: 52
Default

You gotta believe that Texas republicans were giggling behind their hands watching dems build up Talirico, knowing how easy it’s going to be to crush him. Lots of politicians are dumb, Crockett’s stupidity is almost cute, like a 3 year old eating spaghetti, but Talirico is on a whole new level.
Jacuzzme is offline   Quote
Old 03-07-2026, 05:55 PM   #40
Turner2099
Premium Access
 
Join Date: Dec 7, 2025
Location: Houston
Posts: 267
Encounters: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacuzzme View Post
You gotta believe that Texas republicans were giggling behind their hands watching dems build up Talirico, knowing how easy it’s going to be to crush him. Lots of politicians are dumb, Crockett’s stupidity is almost cute, like a 3 year old eating spaghetti, but Talirico is on a whole new level.
Apparently Republicans can't even spell his name right. ; )
Turner2099 is offline   Quote
Old 03-07-2026, 07:52 PM   #41
Jacuzzme
Valued Poster
 
Jacuzzme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 16, 2016
Location: Steel City
Posts: 10,232
Encounters: 52
Default

Seriously, that’s all you’ve got, spelling his name wrong? How about some substance, maybe try’n uncrazy some of the shit he puts out there. Are there actually 6 biological sexes? Start with that one, we can move on to some of the others that he’s going to get obliterated with.
Jacuzzme is offline   Quote
Old 03-07-2026, 09:19 PM   #42
pxmcc
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 8, 2013
Location: houston, tx
Posts: 10,938
Encounters: 55
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacuzzme View Post
Seriously, that’s all you’ve got, spelling his name wrong? How about some substance, maybe try’n uncrazy some of the shit he puts out there. Are there actually 6 biological sexes? Start with that one, we can move on to some of the others that he’s going to get obliterated with.
Yes, here are the 6 sex chromosomes'genotypes:

XX, Xy, XXY, Xyy, Xo, XXX.
pxmcc is offline   Quote
Old 03-07-2026, 10:12 PM   #43
The_Waco_Kid
BANNED
 
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: The MAGA Zone
Posts: 42,155
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pxmcc View Post
Yes, here are the 6 sex chromosomes'genotypes:

XX, Xy, XXY, Xyy, Xo, XXX.

No. that's two sexes and 4 genetic freaks. like a genetic high risk of cancer. or down syndrome.



only functional men can father a child only functional women can bear a child.


yeah .. it's that simple
The_Waco_Kid is offline   Quote
Old 03-07-2026, 10:30 PM   #44
Turner2099
Premium Access
 
Join Date: Dec 7, 2025
Location: Houston
Posts: 267
Encounters: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacuzzme View Post
Seriously, that’s all you’ve got, spelling his name wrong? How about some substance, maybe try’n uncrazy some of the shit he puts out there. Are there actually 6 biological sexes? Start with that one, we can move on to some of the others that he’s going to get obliterated with.
That was a joke, hence the wink. I double check the spelling of his name myself.

The topic you reference was in a thread that was closed by Biomed, so it's really off topic and I don't want to cause this thread t be closed, but to answer your question, there aren't 6 biological sexes, but there are 6, maybe 7 chromosomal sex patterns in humans, two of which are the biological sexes that have XX and XY chromosomes. Talarico himself admitted he wasn't a scientist and essentially wasn't too familiar with the topic. That's why he said 6 biological sexes. He made the mistake of using the word "obviously" and Bongino jumped all over it.

Look up chromosomal sex patterns in humans for detailed information.

As far as the trans-abortion comment called out by Megyn Kelly is concerned, a woman who thinks of herself as a man is considered trans and has functional reproductive organs. If a pregnancy occurs, an abortion might be sought.

Please don't respond to this comment with anymore questions about Talarico because I don't want to violate the rules of the sub.
Turner2099 is offline   Quote
Old 03-07-2026, 11:12 PM   #45
Turner2099
Premium Access
 
Join Date: Dec 7, 2025
Location: Houston
Posts: 267
Encounters: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid View Post
No. that's two sexes and 4 genetic freaks. like a genetic high risk of cancer. or down syndrome.
Calling them genetic freaks doesn't change the reality and it's completely uncool---and then you bring in Down syndrome.
Turner2099 is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved