As predicted . . .

[I B Hankering]

. . . the pictures will probably 'turn up' during the campaign season, but they couldn't be released last year because they were 'too gruesome'. Crass, political chicanery!


Osama Bin Laden Death Photos May Be Released


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...n_1243898.html

[TheDaliLama]

They'll so up in October.

[CuteOldGuy]

Yes, unfortunately brutality is more popular than wisdom these days. Kind of like the last days of ancient Rome.

[Jackie S]

Sometime in October, when we need reminding about how he is such a great Commander in Chief, the Photos will be "leaked".

[timpage]

Yes, let's skip over the part in the article that mentions the reason the photos may be produced: a lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch.

And, if the DOJ refused to produce the photos, you'd all be quacking about how Obama was violating the First Amendment.

You clowns really shred your own credibility, not to mention making yourselves look pretty fucking stupid, when you cherry-pick an article like this and then post up the link that shows the kind-of important facts that you choose not talk about.

Carry on.

[Missy Mariposa]

And, if the DOJ refused to produce the photos, you'd all be quacking about how Obama was violating the First Amendment.

Of course. It's always something.

But honestly what incumbent president wouldn't want these photos released a few months before re-election?

[CuteOldGuy]

Yeah, what President wouldn't want to brag about how he ordered the killing of an unarmed old man who possessed priceless information about terrorist activities that was lost when he was shot, and not interrogated. You bet he'd be damn proud of that. Like I said, brutality trumps wisdom.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by TheDaliLama

They'll so up in October.

so up? Right before you sober up?

[WTF]

Look boys Obama gotta do what he has gotta do. This is a fight between freedom and liberty vs the radical religious right !

[timpage]

Originally Posted by Missy Mariposa

Of course. It's always something.

But honestly what incumbent president wouldn't want these photos released a few months before re-election?

I dunno....I'd be surprised if the release of the photos gets much coverage. Maybe on the internet....based on the description in that article, it doesn't sound like those photos would be shown on TV or in any of the major news distribution outlets.

The point is, the DOJ wouldn't be releasing the photos (and they still may not) but for the lawsuit that was filed.

Wait, I bet next we're going to be hearing about a conspiracy between the DOJ and Judicial Watch, right? They got together and decided to hatch this plot.....in fact, I bet the photos that we are going to see of OBL will have been photo-shopped by the same mysterious stranger who put those fake feet on that innocent little girl in Obama's elementary school photo!!!! Devious scheming bastards. Where are Orley Taitz and the birthers when you need them?!? They'll get to the bottom of this shit.

[timpage]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Yeah, what President wouldn't want to brag about how he ordered the killing of an unarmed old man who possessed priceless information about terrorist activities that was lost when he was shot, and not interrogated. You bet he'd be damn proud of that. Like I said, brutality trumps wisdom.

Well, certainly no Republican president would....I'm certain that any self-respecting GOP president would have brought him in, tortured the heck outta the "poor old man" to get all that valuable intel he was gathering from his compound in Pakistan....and then given him a trial by judge and jury.

COG, truly.....your posts today surpass all prior levels of stupidity exhibited by you in the past....and that takes effort on your part. Off your meds? Or on new ones? Trying to get that doseage right?

You are right on the line here Tim, find a new tactic away from the forbidden topics. CC

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by timpage

Yes, let's skip over the part in the article that mentions the reason the photos may be produced: a lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch.

And, if the DOJ refused to produce the photos, you'd all be quacking about how Obama was violating the First Amendment.

You clowns really shred your own credibility, not to mention making yourselves look pretty fucking stupid, when you cherry-pick an article like this and then post up the link that shows the kind-of important facts that you choose not talk about.

Carry on.

Several on this board predicted this would happen last year. If these pictures are published this year, they could have been published last year. It's crass, political chicanery - something Kool-Aid drinking fools like you choose not to talk about.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Yeah, what President wouldn't want to brag about how he ordered the killing of an unarmed old man who possessed priceless information about terrorist activities that was lost when he was shot, and not interrogated. You bet he'd be damn proud of that. Like I said, brutality trumps wisdom.

holy crap. You agreed with frying Paterno yet Osama needed a mock trial like Saddam. Hot damn I've hbeard it all now

[WTF]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Several on this board predicted this would happen last year. If these pictures are published this year, they could have been published last year. It's crass, political chicanery - something Kool-Aid drinking fools like you choose not to talk about.

damn straight it is! Not much different than dealing arms for hostages! All is fair in love and war my right leaning brother

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by WTF

damn straight it is! Not much different than dealing arms for hostages! All is fair in love and war my right leaning brother

At least Reagan expected a return for his effort. Obama Inc., only has a dead ICE agent and scores of dead Mexican nationals to show for its gun scheme.