Encounter: Fun Dreams at the Dentist

[haskellham]

Date: Early Dec
Name: Kiki
Address and Phone: -
Address: close to HFS
Phone: (four69) six53-7zero38
City: Garland
State: Texas
Email Address: -
URL / Website: -
Activities: regular cleaning
Hair Length and Color: should length black hair
Age: 40s
Smoking Status: Non-Smoker
Ethnic Background: Chinese
Physical Description: Looks like a MILF you'd hit on at the asian supermarket, or even local dentist's office. Perky B cups.
Recommendation: Yes

[TheReferee]

[veloztec]

[haskellham]

[BabygotDak]

U no floss u floss after daty

[haskellham]

Was denied credit for this review because the mods thought that the average hobbyist wouldn't understand what activities occurred from my descriptions. In other words, the mods are questioning your intelligence, and I myself am no longer incentivized to share useful information with board members if I can't obscure the activities enough so that the review can't be used in a court of law.

[phmzee]

Well Done! I guess I am not your average hobbyist. I understood it all.

[TinMan]

Originally Posted by haskellham

Was denied credit for this review because the mods thought that the average hobbyist wouldn't understand what activities occurred from my descriptions. In other words, the mods are questioning your intelligence, and I myself am no longer incentivized to share useful information with board members if I can't obscure the activities enough so that the review can't be used in a court of law.

I can empathize with you on this front. I was denied my first AMP review on A1 for the same reason, despite my using the L1,2,3 descriptors in the Activities list. I didn’t go into detail in my ROS, despite detailed descriptions of almost everything else about the experience, and was still turned down.

I thought it ironic that after another AMP I had reviewed was shut down, one of the complaints made about my review from some quarters was the use of L1-3 in the activities list, the reason being I shouldn’t disclose that level of detail in the public portion of a review. You can’t please everyone!

PS, I thought your ROS was clever and reminded me of the reviews typically posted to ASPD back when we were trying to be both entertaining and a little bit obscure. I knew exactly what you meant and got all the info I need from your review to make a decision about this place.

[Dillhole]

If you think using euphemisms would save you in court you’re sadly mistaken.

[poon_69]

Has this forum been used for court evidence or something before? News to me if so

[haskellham]

LE won't use the boards directly, but if a Karen files a civil petition that screenshots board reviews they will take action. Look at the civil petition that took Tennyson down, it featured reviews from some prominent members of this board that you might recognize (albeit on a site that was not eccie):


https://eccie.net/showpost.php?p=106...2&postcount=72


https://content.civicplus.com/api/as...89fa?scope=all

[haskellham]

Originally Posted by phmzee

Well Done! I guess I am not your average hobbyist. I understood it all.

Most definitely not, you sir are an above average hobbyist, at least when it comes to strip club reports

Originally Posted by TinMan

I can empathize with you on this front. I was denied my first AMP review on A1 for the same reason, despite my using the L1,2,3 descriptors in the Activities list. I didn’t go into detail in my ROS, despite detailed descriptions of almost everything else about the experience, and was still turned down.

I thought it ironic that after another AMP I had reviewed was shut down, one of the complaints made about my review from some quarters was the use of L1-3 in the activities list, the reason being I shouldn’t disclose that level of detail in the public portion of a review. You can’t please everyone!

PS, I thought your ROS was clever and reminded me of the reviews typically posted to ASPD back when we were trying to be both entertaining and a little bit obscure. I knew exactly what you meant and got all the info I need from your review to make a decision about this place.

Appreciate the support TinMan, glad I was able to provide some entertainment and perhaps some value! Yeah it seems like the mods here hate anything that displays a bit of creativity, they'll let you put "see ROS" or "FBSM" in the activities section, but god forbid you write anything other than a pornographic novel in the ROS section.

[TinMan]

In their defense, mods are taking orders from the ownership. As one staff member posted in another forum, these discussions are public and the owner has the ability to read our comments and make changes if they want. So far, no indication he/she/they see the need to make any such changes.