Encounter: Blasian

[The_baron]

User ID: -
Date: 9/16/19
Name: Blasian96
Phone: 515****427 *
Email Address: -
URL (Profile or Bio Page): https://www.seeking.com/member/a1dfd...7-ae30a42aa748
City: Urbandale
State: Iowa
Address: My place
Appointment Type: Outcall
Activities: DFK, HJ, FIV, BBBJ
Duration of Encounter: 60 minutes
Hair Length and Color: Medium black curly
Age: 18
Smoking Status: Non-Smoker
Ethnic Background: Mixed
Physical Description: She’s got a cute face, looks young. 5’2”, A little more weight than the pictures let on but not BBW. She is a mix of black and Asian.
Recommendation: No

*staff edit: masked phone number. - RS

[omg_lol]

Probably shouldn’t be posting reviews of sugar babies here.

[The_baron]

Unfortunately she’s not. There are a lot of people on there that say they are but are actually a traditional ppm.

[RocketSurgeon]

Originally Posted by omg_lol

Probably shouldn’t be posting reviews of sugar babies here.

We've been allowing them as most of the women on SA are actually just UTR PPM escorts.

Originally Posted by The_baron

Unfortunately she’s not. There are a lot of people on there that say they are but are actually a traditional ppm.

The only problem is the phone number. Does she have that # posted publicly on SA or in escort ads posted anywhere else? If not, then the previously posted # needs to be removed or masked, which I'll do now.

Keep in mind that SA will probably delete her account and ban her because of your report.

[Edandgrace]

Why?

[The_baron]

You are assuming that SA is reading this and not reading StG site where many of the SA Ppm ladies are also advertising with no issue from SA.

[gateway7]

tis true. As someone who sought out previously on SA (cause I wanted to expand who was out there), you have to definitely pick and choose who is fair game on SA or just want the money. Myself is no longer on SA, you can figure out why, even after about 3 different go at its.


i will say, currently there is about 4 ladies that are on StG that I saw on SA.
one I have seen, but after doing my own personal research, has a lot of issues that can be easily checked on Iowa Courts Online.

Originally Posted by The_baron

You are assuming that SA is reading this and not reading StG site where many of the SA Ppm ladies are also advertising with no issue from SA.

[SinOrSwim]

Baron you inbox is full

[RocketSurgeon]

Originally Posted by The_baron

You are assuming that SA is reading this and not reading StG site where many of the SA Ppm ladies are also advertising with no issue from SA.

Nope. I know for a fact that SA monitors this site and all click-thrus to SA from eccie. Over the years, SA has done things like implement server directives to redirect people to the SA homepage when they click on SA profile links posted on eccie.

_Usually_, SA only bans/deletes the woman's SA profile if somebody (probably a disgruntled SD or john, or competitor) reports her, or she uses certain keywords or phrases in messages or her profile.
Earlier this year, SA went on a ban rampage and was mass banning guys who paid for premium access for apparently random or no reasons. You can read up on that in the SD forum here if you haven't already.

Based on my 5 years of experience with SA and with this site, I have seen lots of women get banned from SA because they also posted on BP, eccie, stg, cxg, etc. I don't have much insight into how they monitor other sites and ban women, but I know they do monitor and ban. Some of the pro escorts get banned in less than 24 hrs, and others are able to keep their SA profiles going for weeks/months. Of course, I see women create multiple profiles on SA and use them to con or rob guys, and despite some of those women being reported to SA (with substantial evidence in some cases including court/arrest/police documents), they keep coming back to SA, and SA allows them to stay. So SA clearly sucks at policing their site.

[RocketSurgeon]

This one, for example, has been reported multiple times because she is a scammer / con artist (who also discusses PPM via PM there). This profile she created a couple days ago is at least her 4th profile in the past 3 months AFTER she was banned by SA after evidence was provided to them.

https://www.seeking.com/member/ad324...e-21788ad5fb2d

[SinOrSwim]

I like that they ban the pros. Keep that site away from the BP mentality.

[gateway7]

cant see link if not a member (as I cannot be a member no longer)

Originally Posted by RocketSurgeon

This one, for example, has been reported multiple times because she is a scammer / con artist (who also discusses PPM via PM there). This profile she created a couple days ago is at least her 4th profile in the past 3 months AFTER she was banned by SA after evidence was provided to them.

https://www.seeking.com/member/ad324...e-21788ad5fb2d

[The_baron]

It amazes me the number of women on SA that stress they are not escorts and then continue to describe their arrangement which is the definition of an escort. I also ran across a psychologist that said that but then when describing the arrangement she said she booked them like office visit appointments. Smh

[SinOrSwim]

Originally Posted by The_baron

It amazes me the number of women on SA that stress they are not escorts and then continue to describe their arrangement which is the definition of an escort. I also ran across a psychologist that said that but then when describing the arrangement she said she booked them like office visit appointments. Smh

Let em think what they want. LOL

[les123]

I’ve seen similar instances on WYP. They “strictly prohibit “ the hobby. I have been banned for suggesting such acts in their messaging system. The problem is one of the items on the list of what you,are looking for is “discreet affrair”. Well if you are paying the lady to do that, what the hell is it? I have seen a double profile of one of the STG girls on there and several of the ladies I have met are well aware what most intentions are. I’m back on there with limited success my second go around.