Main Menu |
Most Favorited Images |
Recently Uploaded Images |
Most Liked Images |
Top Reviewers |
cockalatte |
650 |
MoneyManMatt |
490 |
Jon Bon |
408 |
Still Looking |
399 |
samcruz |
399 |
Harley Diablo |
377 |
honest_abe |
362 |
DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
George Spelvin |
297 |
Starscream66 |
294 |
Chung Tran |
288 |
lupegarland |
287 |
nicemusic |
285 |
You&Me |
281 |
sharkman29 |
261 |
|
Top Posters |
DallasRain | 71213 | biomed1 | 66667 | Yssup Rider | 62375 | gman44 | 54555 | LexusLover | 51038 | offshoredrilling | 49313 | WTF | 48272 | pyramider | 46397 | bambino | 44488 | The_Waco_Kid | 39146 | CryptKicker | 37374 | Mokoa | 36499 | Chung Tran | 36100 | Still Looking | 35944 | Unique_Carpenter | 33344 |
|
|
04-14-2017, 04:37 PM
|
#1
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jun 12, 2011
Location: Olathe
Posts: 16,815
|
You remember that voter fraud we talke about earlier?
I was listening the other day to Kansas Attorney General Kobach and he was reporting that 30 states are cooperating about voting lists. They are looking for non-citizen voting, double voting, and dead people voting. He would not be definitive yet as everything has to be confirmed but one thing he did dangle (quit drooling WTF) was that in New Hampshire with it's same day registration, they have over 6,000 voters who registered with out of state IDs. So now they have to go through the paperwork about these 6,000 and any voting they did in their home state. Of course, 6,000 possible votes in New Hampshire and California won't cooperate. Just ball parking the population difference there could easily be 100,000 fraudulent votes in California. We should know in a few weeks.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
04-14-2017, 08:42 PM
|
#2
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Nov 23, 2016
Location: north KCMO
Posts: 5,711
|
Will that mean Trump didn't win the election?
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
04-14-2017, 11:26 PM
|
#3
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jun 12, 2011
Location: Olathe
Posts: 16,815
|
That means that Trump may be right again.
|
|
Quote
 | 2 users liked this post
|
04-15-2017, 08:22 AM
|
#4
|
Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 62,375
|
May. MIght.
JDRunk never supports any of his ridiculous theories with any other than homegrown bullshit.
The only sure thing is that Trump is THE MOTHER OF ALL DICKS.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
04-15-2017, 09:47 AM
|
#5
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jun 19, 2011
Location: Dixie Land
Posts: 22,098
|
13% of illegal aliens vote... http://www.capoliticalreview.com/cap...mit-they-vote/
Judge Andrew Napolitano says that “if you are an illegal alien in California, get a driver’s license, register to vote, you can vote in local, state, and federal elections in California and those votes count.”
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2015/10/13/na...#ixzz4eKkKUJ5O
http://www.investors.com/politics/co...om-california/
Quote:
Outside California, Hillary Clinton lost the popular vote by 1.4 million to Donald Trump.
|
Quote:
Deemocrats who are having trouble getting out of the first stage of grief — denial — aren't being helped by the fact that, now that all the votes are counted, Hillary Clinton's lead in the popular vote has topped 2.8 million, giving her a 48% share of the vote compared with Trumps 46%.
To those unschooled in how the United States selects presidents, this seems totally unfair. But look more closely at the numbers and you see that Clinton's advantage all but disappears.
As we noted in this space earlier, while Clinton's overall margin looks large and impressive, it is due to Clinton's huge margin of victory in one state — California — where she got a whopping 4.3 million more votes than Trump.
California is the only state, in fact, where Clinton's margin of victory was bigger than President Obama's in 2012 — 61.5% vs. Obama's 60%.
But California is the exception that proves the true genius of the Electoral College — which was designed to prevent regional candidates from dominating national elections.
In recent years, California has been turning into what amounts to a one-party state. Between 2008 and 2016, the number of Californian's who registered as Democrats climbed by 1.1 million, while the number of registered Republicans dropped by almost 400,000.
What's more, many Republicans in the state had nobody to vote for in November.
There were two Democrats — and zero Republicans — running to replace Sen. Barbara Boxer. There were no Republicans on the ballot for House seats in nine of California's congressional districts.
At the state level, six districts had no Republicans running for the state senate, and 16 districts had no Republicans running for state assembly seats.
Plus, since Republicans knew Clinton was going to win the state — and its entire 55 electoral votes — casting a ballot for Trump was virtually meaningless, since no matter what her margin of victory, Clinton was getting all 55 votes.
Is it any wonder then, that Trump got 11% fewer California votes than John McCain did in 2008? (Clinton got 6% more votes than Obama did eight years ago, but the number of registered Democrats in the state climbed by 13% over those years.)
If you take California out of the popular vote equation, then Trump wins the rest of the country by 1.4 million votes. And if California voted like every other Democratic state — where Clinton averaged 53.5% wins — Clinton and Trump end up in a virtual popular vote tie. (This was not the case in 2012. Obama beat Romney by 2 million votes that year, not counting California.)
Meanwhile, if you look at every other measure, Trump was the clear and decisive winner in this election.
***
Number of states won:
Trump: 30
Clinton: 20
_________________
Trump: +10
Number of electoral votes won:
Trump: 306
Clinton: 232
_________________
Trump: + 68
Ave. margin of victory in winning states:
Trump: 56%
Clinton: 53.5%
_________________
Trump: + 2.5 points
Popular vote total:
Trump: 62,958,211
Clinton: 65,818,318
_________________
Clinton: + 2.8 million
Popular vote total outside California:
Trump: 58,474,401
Clinton: 57,064,530
_________________
Trump: + 1.4 million
|
|
|
Quote
 | 2 users liked this post
|
04-15-2017, 01:29 PM
|
#6
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Oct 2, 2014
Location: san antonio tx
Posts: 1,665
|
And this major statistic too - counties won: Trump 2,654, Hillary 487 ..... and in Congress, Republicans have a 52-48 seat majority in the Senate and a 241-194 seat majority in the House of Representatives .....
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
04-15-2017, 01:35 PM
|
#7
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 00 gauge
And this major statistic too - counties won: Trump 2,654, Hillary 487 ..... and in Congress, Republicans have a 52-48 seat majority in the Senate and a 241-194 seat majority in the House of Representatives .....
|
The Liberals don't like "elections" ... it shows.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
04-15-2017, 03:28 PM
|
#9
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Mar 31, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 15,054
|
As far as Presidential Elections go, California and New York have made themselves irrelavent. Why waste time, money, and resources even campaigning in those two liberal enclaves.
Concentrate on the the remaining 48 States.
It's the same wat with Congress. Who gives a shit what California and New York want.
Keep in mind, most of those votes that gave Hillary the popular vote win were concentrated in those two States.
The rest of the Country sees it different.
Let them stew in their Liberal/Socialist/ProgressiveDemocrat caldron. The rest of the Country will move forward
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
04-15-2017, 05:54 PM
|
#10
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,272
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover
The Liberals don't like "elections" ... it shows.
|
Not lately but they loved them in 2006, 2008 and kinda in 2012.
You do understand wtf a political pendulum is don't you...maybe not.
.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
04-15-2017, 06:33 PM
|
#11
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 20, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 14,460
|
"Progressives" don't like legal elections.
I'va still doesn't know how to post a link.
What happened to illegal Michigan/Detroit?
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
04-15-2017, 06:51 PM
|
#12
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,272
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gnadfly
"Progressives" don't like legal elections.
I'va still doesn't know how to post a link.
What happened to illegal Michigan/Detroit?
|
So the 2016 election was not legal?
.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
04-15-2017, 07:22 PM
|
#13
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 20, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 14,460
|
Detroit had some precincts with more legal voters that votes. Some Detroit precincts had less voters than legal votes. Therefore although Michigan's election was certified they did not have a complete recount.
Try to keep up WTF rather than posting smilicons. It makes you look more like a moronic buffoon.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
04-16-2017, 07:19 AM
|
#14
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jul 24, 2013
Location: Aqui !
Posts: 8,942
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover
The Liberals don't like "elections" ... it shows.
|
They don't like elections that they can't steal ! And think of all that time they wasted registering the illegals and all of those midnight trips to the cemeteries for " voter registration drives " .
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
04-16-2017, 07:36 AM
|
#15
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,272
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rey Lengua
They don't like elections that they can't steal ! And think of all that time they wasted registering the illegals and all of those midnight trips to the cemeteries for " voter registration drives " .
|
And the nomo's like you like to make it harder for the old and nlack folks to bote....so it all evens out , right Gay Rey?
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
Find Ladies |
Hot Women |
|