Quote:
Originally Posted by Duke of G
No, you conspiracy-theorist simpleton.
|
I guess starting replies to threads with denigrating insults of members is now
your job since Bubba resigned?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duke of G
I moved it here, because a) it's not a review and b) it's not an alert. It's your self-proclaimed captain-save-a-john moment.
|
Not an alert?
I'll document again here her past track record of OUTING and threats to clients. If somehow you feel that outing is not Alert worthy, what does to you? A client getting killed or beaten by her pimp driver?
Donice has plenty of upselling reviews on this board under her various handles and by various members and combining them into one thread in the forum where said reviews have been posted appeared to be the best way to provide a quick and easy source of information for the members here.
This board segments data into relevant forums. The Alert Forum purpose has been discussed on this site within a year or so and potential harm was one of the issues deemed alert worthy. .
Adding further insults by trying to assign the title of Captain Save a John when one of the main purposes of this site and other review sites is to help the "Johns" save time and money basically insults anyone who posts reviews on here because they too are saving other clients. Or do you not get that?
What it is that truly bothers you about my collecting and combing the bits and pieces about a provider who changes names and numbers so often and putting them in one place where I was told by staff in the past?
Ever try to run a search for a phone number on ECCIE? It doesn't work very well at all and questions about that have been asked in the technical forum at least once and even here in the Dallas forums and there are various suggestions but at this time, ECCIE search of phone numbers is quircky at best and the ways people enter phone numbers in reviews and posts makes it even more difficult.:
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=428200
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=318029
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duke of G
But how is this post being in co-ed somehow MISSING your purpose? Is co-ed now some "secret boneyard of lost info that no one will ever see?" Do you think that folks won't read it?
|
Other than this back and forth, is there really any discussion needed about this type of collected information? What can providers ad to this thread if it is in discussions? They are not calling her up for appointments are they?
This is a DISCUSSION forum so not sure how a thread that presents collected information about a long running upseller and bait and switch and outing provider would need discussion.
Please explain if you would what sort of discussion this thread could entail?
Will Donice register a handle and come on here and present her side of this?
Will her white knights jump in and defend her again like they have in the past bother here on ECCIE and on ASPD?
Doubtful the white knights would defend her in public.
As a staff member you know that there is a huge percentage of members who avoid this forum for a reason and even more avoid it when doing research. Potential clients end to search Alerts and the review forums. NOT Coed.
That is much of the actual reason I felt the review forum was better suited and yes, I do believe that this forum is ignored by many members.
As for your additional insulting attitude that you claim I have about deserving an answer, sorry, but I do think of other sides of the equation, especially that of the staff and when it seems the "policies and procedures" in place one day have changed without any warning or notice the next, then isn't it part of the ECCIE staff's job to inform the members?
As to your denigrating attitude about theories and patterns, a pattern may take time to observe or discover but with the numerous way threads about this upseller have been handled in the past both on this site and previously on ASPD combined with staff that moved to ECCIE from ASPD, patterns can be observed
If board policies and procedures are changed on this board, then would it not the membership better by letting us know? A quick discussion thread started by the Staff letting members know?
The discussion and debate about NCNS not being allowed in Reviews any longer and not being attached to the provider's profile included some very relevant points that you insult me over and included how many clients tend to not search Coed when researching and might just miss the NCNS threads. Well, if they are missing the NCNS threads, pretty sure they will also miss this thread.
And possibly how about that when a thread is moved because of such a change, shooting a quick PM to the OP such as myself telling them why so as to avoid complications?
Now, if ECCIE board policy is that a provider with a past histoty of OUTING and threatening clients is not Alert worthy, I'm not sure what else truly might be?
Read this old ASPD/ERAPS thread where the OP talks about being outed to his work:
http://www.eraps.net/showthread.php/...ghlight=donice
Here is the specific post about her outing and more threats: (JerryD was a Mod on ASPD back in the day)
Quote:
JerryD,
Yes - this is my first post, and to make matters worse, this was my first time to "pay" for "attention". Thus it makes it all the worse. Just so you know I have even recieved SEVERAL threats from her or affliates to stop exposing her. She has even contacted my business and emailed every employee in the company using a company form on our website. Guys, please watch out and becareful. I completely expect her to "correct" her offerings for a while to try to remedy the surfacings of her behavior with me. Email me directly if you wish to call and I will give you my cell and I am VERY willing to speak with anyone one the phone about this as it seems to be getting worse - Threats, I mean and now contacting my employees...
|
In addition to that example of this provider
outing someone, a danger to be sure, this site will also ban a provider (verified or not) or an agency, that uses fake photos. And remove the fake photos from their showcase or ads. It has been probably 7-10 years since Donice has bothered to use real photos in any of her multiple Backpage, EROS, or other ad site.
To help in searches since this is now in Coed, here are more of her names and numbers from previous fake photo ads:
214-221-0064 Kimmy / Aiden / Alex
214-221-9125 Sam / Kasey / Tina Tay / Carson
972-247-4759 Kelly
214-265-5510 Joey
214-340-1212 Aiden
214-341-8233 Casey
214-342-6118 Kiley
214-343-3030 Anya
214-346-6558 Reese
214-373-0101 Britton / Reese
214-646-5772 Becca
214-696-2064 Jessie / Honey
214-866-0076 Kitana
469-364-5266 Shannon
972-234-2244 Gina
972-386-9488 Joey
972-744-9625 Becca / Candice
972-980-9075 Randi / Tosha / Aiden
Informative thread from Eraps from 2005:
http://www.eraps.net/showthread.php/...ghlight=donice
Here's a lovely upsell of hers where she got 340 for a massage and CBJ:
http://www.eraps.net/showthread.php/...ghlight=donice
And yes, I do understand that the staff is pretty busy and can easily miss certain threads especially if they are not flagged by someone but here is an
Alert thread on her when she was using yet another name:
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=67612
The OP mentions he will post a review and he did:
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=67615
IF you click the Backpage link in post #3 from 07-07-2010 for Carson, it will bring up a current ad today for one of the names and numbers originally posted above.
Early Christmas present - Almost annual Donice alert thread
My Bio Page - Texas - Dallas
