How does a provider handle a bad hobbiest?

[swwaustin]

Originally Posted by oldtiger

Hey! Don't use ME as the example!

TOO LATE! Now everyone knows about Old Tiger's one nipple is bigger than the other problem.

[oldtiger]

Originally Posted by swwaustin

TOO LATE! Now everyone knows about Old Tiger's one nipple is bigger than the other problem.

It was an industrial accident!

[Naughty_Jezabelle]

Originally Posted by swwaustin

LOL, yeah that might not go over very well. Still, if a provider was paying me $$ an hour for my time, I would think she could write anything she wanted.

I must agree. Bibi, we aren't paying them. They are giving us money for our valued company.

You can seach businesses and see all there reviews from customers, but you don't see to many businesses talking about the customers that see them. Sure not all the men we see are easy to please, and some can be quite demanding, but we are here for THEM. They are hiring us... meaning we should cater to them as much as possible.

It doesn't matter what the look like, their dipstick size or nipple .... conditions? lol

Im sorry this has happened to you and your friend and you handle it the way that you feel comfortable with and maintains your classy behavior. Good luck hunnie and happy hobbying.

[Lana Foxx]

[/quote]LOL, yeah that might not go over very well. Still, if a provider was paying me $$ an hour for my time, I would think she could write anything she wanted.[/quote]

Sweetie, I hope you're kidding here! A provider's best friend is a good review, so one that chooses to have a "no review" policy is doing so at her detriment. For one, it doesn't save you if you're running a scam and it prevents potential clients from hearing about the best moments from the mouth of the man who made it happen.

Some of us can't have 'em because of complicated situations and it SUCKS. Plus, keep in mind whatever is on the internet STAYS there. Even now, do we truly truly KNOW the future ramifications of having this material out there? What if your SO came across your stories or your grown children in 15 years?

LMAO....I don't want to even think about it....let's get nakey!

[Lana Foxx]

Oh, but what i was going to say was why not do what the VC ladies did to the GI's back in Vienam. Some well placed razor blades really make bbfs un-appealing.

I've had similar situations, baby. Don't let it ruin YOUR peace of mind. Get the tests, take the precautions and learn the lessons. In the meantime, don't fail to make sure these a-holes get theirs. Do not let fear of breaking the rules of any board put other providers in jeopardy. These clients should be black-balled. No pun intended.

[Darth]

My .02 cents...I wish providers felt more comfortable reviewing their own reviews--Yes, it can turn into a He-Said, She said confrontation, which sucks--but--for reviews that are substantially accurate, a quick "Ditto" or "Yes" from the provider I think will help validate the review--If it ISN'T Substantively accurate, a "No-PM me" will also provide good info...Dangerous Hobbyists absolutely should be outed on the board--to all other providers, at least--Whether in the ladies chat, or PM to all providers you know--maybe a "Don;t see this guy" thread in the Powder room...If you want to ruin their reputation amongst all other hobbyists, (and I would say the scary, dangerous types TOTALLY have this coming) by all means, out them across the board...BUT..the nice guy with a beer belly and the pencil dick probably doesn;t deserve this kind of response---If he posts an inaccurate, unfavorable review, the "No-PM me" is probably the only response required--and don;t respond to the he-said she said comments except in PM's to the guys that seem to be latching on to his inaccurate review...

[swwaustin]

Originally Posted by Celder1

My .02 cents...I wish providers felt more comfortable reviewing their own reviews--Yes, it can turn into a He-Said, She said confrontation, which sucks--but--for reviews that are substantially accurate, a quick "Ditto" or "Yes" from the provider I think will help validate the review--If it ISN'T Substantively accurate, a "No-PM me" will also provide good info....

It's my understanding that providers can't post a reply on a review, if that is a rule, I wouldn't mind seeing that changed. Celder brings up a good point, it would provide verification that the encounter actually occured, and it would provide ladies an opportunity to explain their side if it is a negative review.

I realize that the content of the message is BCD, and ....presumably off limits to the lady, but still it would provide valuable information.

BiBiJoy, didn't mean to derail your thread, but your post has lead to some interesting ideas.

[Lana Foxx]

I love small dicks...actually guys with average to smaller cocks have better tongue skills..it's a scientific fact so we love our clients with little ones. I totally agree with Celder. However, we are not allowed to comment in the review section. I have often seen reviews on other providers where I wanted to give a shout out to em or say thanks for a review done on me, but it's not allowed. Just the way it works I guess...

These ladies are just mad and rightfully so. It shakes you to your foundations. Makes you feel vulnerable and weak. This situation is a veritable mind screw. These ladies are pro's though and I know they will do the right thing. If I can help, let me know!

[Bibi Joy]

LOL Yes that makes total sense but I think for the safety of the provider some kind of comment about the hobbiest should be allowed to be viewed by all...I mean you as a hobbiest is paying for our time but me as a provider is giving you something that will make your toes curl.

Hell I say thats better than any peice of paper with or without the presidents on there!!!

[oldyoungkid]

as a card carrying member of the "nice guy with a beer belly and pencil dick" union, I just wanted to add my two cents and say, I hope both of you ladies are OK and will hopefully not let those horrible events deter you from allowing decent individuals like myself from meeting you. Hate to wonder what it would be like for us without ALL of YOU ladies providing us the time/care/love that you do.

Some sort of format that would allow the ladies some input on a review certainly would be intriguing. Possibly a section named "Disputed or Contested" just in case they start dominating the review section. You could go directly to the "Disputed or Contested" area or go to the regular review area.

Admin bosses would probably have to do some serious intel/census on that though, I imagine.

Again, hope both of you are OK.

And say no to bad niples!

[Bibi Joy]

Absolutely this is a service we provide to our hobbiest wether they have a pencil dick or an anaconda either way a provider as myself can handle it.....ALLLL good providers have the skills and tools to make your toes curl!! lol

My point is these reviews will and can make and break a provider.....And damn if I have seen one little comment break many providers to where they put the close sign up turn off the lights and head for the hills!

Some hobbiest use this review tactic at there advantage and if your a bad one out there you can easily use it in the wrong way. Its mean and its wrong but it happens over and over alot of what these bad hobbiest say in there review never even happened. And there on another computer sits a provider broken hearted and broke because noone wants to see her anymore.

There are two sides to every story and just as its been pointed out we as GOOD providers should have a say in the reviews that are blasted all over the internet!!

[Pistolero]

Originally Posted by swwaustin

It's my understanding that providers can't post a reply on a review, if that is a rule, I wouldn't mind seeing that changed. Celder brings up a good point, it would provide verification that the encounter actually occured, and it would provide ladies an opportunity to explain their side if it is a negative review.

.

swwaustin, at one time on ASPD the ladies were able to reply to reviews.



But, the higher powers watched those train wrecks a while and made the change. It was a disaster. It became much nicer on the board when the change was made.

[Transplanted2tex]

Originally Posted by Pistolero

swwaustin, at one time on ASPD the ladies were able to reply to reviews.



But, the higher powers watched those train wrecks a while and made the change. It was a disaster. It became much nicer on the board when the change was made.

I concur with the above statement. The review section isn't the proper forum for he-said-she-said. Also, allowing provider responses would discourage honest reviews of a critical nature. Providers can contact mods in the event of false and defamatory reviews. Also, review boards are mostly self-regulating, and the credibility of a poster is open to public scrutiny. So far, it seems that unfairly negative or outright false reviews (Pepper's comes to mind) are immediately discredited by board members. Similarly, it doesn't take long for someone to cry "quack" when a seemingly self-promoting review is posted.

[swwaustin]

Originally Posted by Pistolero

swwaustin, at one time on ASPD the ladies were able to reply to reviews.



But, the higher powers watched those train wrecks a while and made the change. It was a disaster. It became much nicer on the board when the change was made.

Yeah, I could see plenty of opportunity for trouble. I forget that in many cases there are reasons things are done the way that they are, as in this instance it was tried and failed. Still, I would like to see some way that providers could at least verify or contest that encounters took place.

[KlassyKelliAnn]

I dont mean to hijack this thread further from its intended point.....but....

I hear many ladies saying that we need to treat our clients like Gods because they pay us the big $ to do so. In some cases this is easy to do and I agree and at other times, the client himself makes it downright difficult to even consider him a human being because of one reason or another (poor hygiene and disrespect come to mind). Now, while I agree with excellent customer service and also that reviews are important.....one must remember too that WE ladies reserve the right to give and/or deny "vouches" which can make hobbying fairly easy or fairly difficult. I have not heard anyone mention anything on vouching and where this thread seemed to be heading, I thought it interesting as it was lacking that this wasnt brought up.

Anyway, giving the thread back.......

Respectfully,
Kelli Ann Preston