A very articulate analysis

[WyldemanATX]

This pretty much tells it like it is.



THE REAL PROBLEM WITH OUR GOVERNMENTAL SYSTEM - - - -


The folks who are gettingfree shit,
Don't like the folks who are paying for the free shit,
Because the folks who are paying for the free shit,
Can no longer afford to pay for both the free shit and their ownshit.

And,
The folks who are paying for the free shit,
Want the free shit to stop.
And the folks who are gettingthe free shit,
Want even MOREfree shit on top of the free shit they're gettingalready!

Now..... The people who are forcing people to PAY for the free shit,
Have told the people who are RECEIVING the free shit,
That the people who are PAYING for the free shit,
Are being mean, prejudiced and racist.

So .... the people who are GETTING the free shit,
Have been convinced they need to HATE the people who are PAYING for the
free shit because they are selfish. And they are promised more free shit if they will vote for



the people who force the people who pay for the free shit to give them even more free shit.








And - - - - - that's the Straight Shit!

I did not write this. I am LMAO and crying at how true it is.

[Booth]

Didn't read it due to the OP's lack of integrity.

[WyldemanATX]

You did not read it, but felt compelled to tell everyone with a post in the thread you did not read.

Wouldn't it be easier to just not open it and not post in it? I think it would be more believable that you did not read it had you done that.

[E2]

Originally Posted by Booth

Didn't read it due to the OP's lack of integrity.

Unnecessary !

[Booth]

Originally Posted by Wyldeman30

You did not read it, but felt compelled to tell everyone with a post in the thread you did not read.

That is correct, sir.

Wouldn't it be easier to just not open it and not post in it? I think it would be more believable that you did not read it had you done that.

That's one of the many differences between the two of us. I'm not looking for the easier way. Honestly, I don't even recall what this thread is about other than it being another cut and paste job.

[Booth]

Originally Posted by E2

Unnecessary !

Please direct me to any post in the Sandbox that you do consider necessary.

[InU]

1. You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity, bylegislating the wealth out of prosperity.




2. What one person receives without working for,another person must work for without receiving.




3. The government cannot give to anybody anything thatthe government does not first take from somebody else.




4. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it.




5. When half of the people get the idea that they do nothave to work because the other half is going to take care of them; and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work, because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that is the beginning of the end of any nation.







Put me in charge of food stamps. I'd get rid of Lone Star cards; no cash for
Ding Dongs or Ho Ho's, just money for 50-pound bags of rice and beans,
blocks of cheese and all the powdered milk you can haul away. If you want
steak and frozen pizza, then get a job.

Put me in charge of Medicaid. The first thing I'd do is to get women
Norplant birth control implants or tubal ligations. Then, we'll test
recipients for drugs, alcohol, and nicotine and document all tattoos and
piercings. If you want to reproduce or use drugs, alcohol, smoke or get
tats and piercings, then get a job.

Put me in charge of government housing. Ever live in a military barracks?
You will maintain our property in a clean and good state of repair. Your
"home" will be subject to inspections anytime and possessions will be
inventoried. If you want a plasma TV or Xbox 360, then get a job and your
own place.

In addition, you will either present a check stub from a job each week or
you will report to a "government" job. It may be cleaning the roadways of
trash, painting and repairing public housing, whatever we find for you. We
will sell your 22 inch rims and low profile tires and your blasting stereo
and speakers and put that money toward the “common good..”

Before you write that I've violated someone's rights, realize that all of
the above is voluntary. If you want our money, accept our rules.. Before
you say that this would be "demeaning" and ruin their "self esteem,"
consider that it wasn't that long ago that taking someone else's money for
doing absolutely nothing was demeaning and lowered self esteem.

If we are expected to pay for other people's mistakes we should at least
attempt to make them learn from their bad choices. The current system
rewards them for continuing to make bad choices.

AND While you are on Gov’t subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! Yes that is
correct. For you to vote would be a conflict of interest. You will
voluntarily remove yourself from voting while you are receiving a Gov’t
welfare check. If you want to vote, then get a job.

[Shayla]

Hahahaha! Great post!

[Billy_Saul]

Originally Posted by InU

AND While you are on Gov’t subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! Yes that is
correct. For you to vote would be a conflict of interest. You will
voluntarily remove yourself from voting while you are receiving a Gov’t
welfare check. If you want to vote, then get a job.

This would effectively relegate the Democratic party to the dustbins of history.

[Laz]

A thread with rational thought. How refreshing.

[WyldemanATX]

I thought the bar tab analogy would have got more attention than this one.

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by Billy_Saul

This would effectively relegate the Democratic party to the dustbins of history.

What a sweet little hunk of heaven you must be, BS!