Tariff Man and his tariff plan cause market plunges

[jayzee43]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/federal...supreme-court/

Not unexpected. The administration made numerous statements in public and court about its ability to pay refunds before the ruling.

The courts aren't letting Tariffman weasel out of it now

I guarantee they're going to use this as an excuse for not issuing tariff rebate checks they were babbling about (which were never coming anyway, but now at least they have a half-baked excuse).

[HDGristle]

Originally Posted by jayzee43

I guarantee they're going to use this as an excuse for not issuing tariff rebate checks they were babbling about (which were never coming anyway, but now at least they have a half-baked excuse).

Actually, it's a procedural step to return that issue to the Court of International Trade.

It means we're closer the refunds becoming reality.

[jayzee43]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

Actually, it's a procedural step to return that issue to the Court of International Trade.

It means we're closer the refunds becoming reality.

Closer to becoming a reality for the small business owners, but not for anyone else. And those prices won't be coming back down. The damage has been done.

[HDGristle]

Large, small and medium. As well as a variety of individual citizens who got hit directly by the de minimus exemption ending.

[jayzee43]

If you own a business, you MIGHT see a tariff refund. Nobody else will, though, and those businesses won't be lowering their prices back to pre-tariff rates. The damage has been done. Thanks trump.

[HDGristle]

[HDGristle]

https://apnews.com/article/trump-tar...739ab13086ff9e

In a defeat for the Trump administration, a federal judge in New York ruled Wednesday that companies that paid tariffs struck down last month by Supreme Court are due refunds.

Judge Richard Eaton of the U.S. Court of International Trade wrote that “all importers of record’’ were “entitled to benefit’’ from theSupreme Court ruling that struck downsweeping double-digit import taxes President Donald Trump imposed last year under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).

The Supreme Court foundthose tariffsto be unconstitutional under the emergency powers law, including the sweeping “reciprocal” tariffs he levied on nearly every other country. The majority ruled that the president could not unilaterally set and change tariffs because taxation power clearly belongs to Congress.

In his ruling, Eaton wrote that he alone “will hear cases pertaining to the refund of IEEPA duties.’’ The ruling offers some clarity about the tariff refund process, something the Supreme Court did not even mention in its Feb. 20 decision. Trade lawyer Ryan Majerus, a partner at King & Spalding and a former U.S. trade official, said he expects the government to appeal or “seek a stay to buy more time for U.S. Customs to comply.″

Progress

[eyecu2]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

Actually, it's a procedural step to return that issue to the Court of International Trade.

It means we're closer the refunds becoming reality.

I doubt that it will ever be a reality to any purchasers, but probably to some retail importers. It would be VERY hard to roll that down to end users / consumers specifically and at any specific percentage.

[HDGristle]

Its not going to be designed for end-consumer unless end-consumer was the importer.

Your doubt is well-founded

[jayzee43]

But to hear MAGA spin it, everyone's getting a $2,000 tariff rebate check in the mail. Lol. These shitheads will fall for anything.

And then, when the checks don't come, they'll just shrug their shoulders and move onto their next dumbass lie. Imagine living your life like that. Constantly lying to yourself. It's insanity.

[HDGristle]

Https://www.cnbc.com/2026/03/05/trum...-decision.html

Another foreseeable lawsuit brewing over Tariffman's use of the 122 tariff authority.

I'm in favor of 122 authority, if it's used legally. Haven't see that there's a legitimate balance of payments deficit, though.