Clintons Headed For Prison??

[elghund]

Originally Posted by rooster

For once, I am willing to JUST WAIT. This won't take long. And then this thread will die from the boredom of the outcome.

.

It already did……

elg…..

[royamcr]

Remember which party voted to cut funding.

Embassy Security (2011–2012): Prior to the 2012 attack, House Republicans, including Reps. Darrell Issa and Jason Chaffetz, voted for embassy security funding that was $459 million lower than the Obama administration's request.

Sure this happened under Clinton's time as Sec State, but she doesn't control the purse. Half a billion sure would have gone a long way to secure the embassies and prevent what happened.

Originally Posted by Salty Again

Well, Crikey, mate... I don't feel yer statement is all THAT idiotic.
We've all seen over the years how Hillary is... Though you DID
mention Benghazi - what difference does it make NOW?? ...

... 'Course IF you don't fancy the thread topic, you need not post.

... And lemme clear something up - this sitting with The Clintons
is NOT a Hearing... Just depositions - UNDER OATH...

They've NOT been accused of any crime.. ... ... Yet. ...

##### Salty

[elghund]

Originally Posted by royamcr

Remember which party voted to cut funding.

Embassy Security (2011–2012): Prior to the 2012 attack, House Republicans, including Reps. Darrell Issa and Jason Chaffetz, voted for embassy security funding that was $459 million lower than the Obama administration's request.

Sure this happened under Clinton's time as Sec State, but she doesn't control the purse. Half a billion sure would have gone a long way to secure the embassies and prevent what happened.

Facts always get in the way of any good MAGAtard theories.



elg…..

[Yssup Rider]

There are no good MAGA theories. They are fantasies in the minds of those who worship a lunatic.

[RX792P]

Will Comer agree to public hearing?
If not...why not...does he feel the Committee needs to 'massage' the info before releasing it to the public?
I would agree with Hillary that's the most transparent.

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton challenged Republicans on the House Oversight Committee to take her testimony and that of former President Bill Clinton about sex offender Jeffrey Epstein in public, and not in a closed session as those lawmakers plan.

“So let’s stop the games. If you want this fight, @RepJamesComer, let’s have it — in public,” Clinton wrote, naming the panel’s chairman.

“You love to talk about transparency. There’s nothing more transparent than a public hearing, cameras on.”

[elghund]

Originally Posted by RX792P

Will Comer agree to public hearing?
If not...why not...does he feel the Committee needs to 'massage' the info before releasing it to the public?
I would agree with Hillary that's the most transparent.

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton challenged Republicans on the House Oversight Committee to take her testimony and that of former President Bill Clinton about sex offender Jeffrey Epstein in public, and not in a closed session as those lawmakers plan.

“So let’s stop the games. If you want this fight, @RepJamesComer, let’s have it — in public,” Clinton wrote, naming the panel’s chairman.

“You love to talk about transparency. There’s nothing more transparent than a public hearing, cameras on.”

Republicans are terrified about open, transparent, public hearings. They cant control the spin in advance.

elg…..

[Salty Again]

Originally Posted by Salty Again

Well, Crikey, mate... I don't feel yer statement is all THAT idiotic.
We've all seen over the years how Hillary is... Though you DID
mention Benghazi - what difference does it make NOW?? ...

... 'Course IF you don't fancy the thread topic, you need not post.

... And lemme clear something up - this sitting with The Clintons
is NOT a Hearing... Just depositions - UNDER OATH...

They've NOT been accused of any crime.. ... ... Yet. ...

##### Salty

... THIS


#### Salty

[Salty Again]

... Ain't it just AMAZING that Bill and Hillary DO NOW want to
come in for a chat with The Congressional Oversight Committee.

They've been stalling for months - and NOW, now that DEMOCRATS
on the Oversight Committee surely sided with the Republicans
and were about to vote the Clintons - in Contempt. ...

... See? ... The Clintons USED to have a lot o' stroke with things.
But THAT was before - NOW things are different... Not just
for Bill and Hillary, but MOST of the Democrat party.

... Blimey! ... Democrats pushing for CONTEMPT charges against
Bill and Hillary Clinton! ... ... ... Who would
have even thought THAT was possible... ...

... Maybe the Clintons ARE headed for Prison.... ...

#### Salty

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by Salty Again

... Maybe the Clintons ARE headed for Prison.... ...

#### Salty

Wanna bet?

Come on, bruv. Stand behind the bullshit theories... if that's what they are? Who knows? Maybe they're not? I dunno.

Just wait...

🦘 🦘 🦘