Who’s getting indicted this week?

[bambino]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

What did Grok say about the statute of limitations on the Comey charge?

Nothing, and neither did the Judge who dismissed the case. She dismissed it stating the prosecutor was unlawfully appointed. She said nothing about the merits of the case. So they’ll appeal with a different prosecutor.

[HDGristle]

Comey attorney Patrick Fitzgerald said in a statement that his reading of the ruling suggests the case can't be refiled because the five-year statute of limitations has expired since the indictment was brought.

Fitzgerald said the ruling "indicates that because the indictment is void, the statute of limitations has run and there can be no further indictment."

The Justice Department has said in court papers that it believes the case could still move forward because of U.S. Code 3288. The federal statute says in part, “Whenever an indictment or information charging a felony is dismissed for any reason after the period prescribed by the applicable statute of limitations has expired, a new indictment may be returned in the appropriate jurisdiction within six calendar months of the date of the dismissal of the indictment or information.”

Comey's attorneys have countered that the six-month grace period doesn't apply in this case because Halligan didn't have the power to bring an indictment to begin with, so all of her official actions are void — a prospect the judge expressly agreed with.

Can't count on the Grok.

Above could be important. And they wouldn't appeal with a different prosecutor. You mean refile the charges. The appeal is an entirely different monster

[bambino]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

Can't countvon the Grok.

Above could be important. And they wouldn't appeal with a different prosecutor. You mean refile the charges. The appeal is an e timely different monster

The charges will be refiled and both will be re indicted. They can introduce a co prosecutor. Don’t get your hopes up Mr Gristle. How many more times will your hopes be dashed. The judge ruled without prejudice. She knew it would be appealed and left that door wide open.

[HDGristle]

Tell them to get on it. Chop chop

[bambino]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

Tell them to get on it. Chop chop

Ever the sage, Ed Whelan kindly calls my attention to Section 3288 of the federal criminal code (Title 18, U.S. Code). In pertinent part, it states:

Whenever an indictment or information charging a felony is dismissed for any reason after the period prescribed by the applicable statute of limitations has expired, a new indictment may be returned in the appropriate jurisdiction within six calendar months of the date of the dismissal of the indictment or information.

This indicates that if Judge Michael Nachmanoff were to dismiss the indictment based on one of Comey’s soon-to-be-filed pretrial motions, the government could theoretically refile the charges (assuming there is a way to refile them that fixes whatever flaw resulted in the dismissal).

They are. Two weeks!!!!!!

[bambino]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

She's an actual lawyer, but prosecutorial criminal law isn't her experience nor focus in the field. Clearly.

No need to get misogynistic over it or start talking about her sucking cock on OnlyFans

Tommy’s immaturity and vulgarity knows no bounds. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Credit is due.

[jayzee43]

Originally Posted by bambino

Nothing, and neither did the Judge who dismissed the case. She dismissed it stating the prosecutor was unlawfully appointed. She said nothing about the merits of the case. So they’ll appeal with a different prosecutor.

Will this "different prosecutor" actually have any experience, you know, prosecuting people?

I would hope MAGA at least learned that much from this debacle.

[jayzee43]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

She's an actual lawyer, but prosecutorial criminal law isn't her experience nor focus in the field. Clearly.

No need to get misogynistic over it or start talking about her sucking cock on OnlyFans

There's no need to call Michelle Obama a man, or the Governor of Minnesota "Tampon Tim" either. And so, here we are.

I took the gloves off 5 years ago with MAGA. I'm all too happy to meet them down on their level. They don't deserve, nor will they get, any of my respect.

I drew the line on J6. MAGA is fucking dead to me.

I still stand by my statement, however... Lindsey Halligan is much more qualified to go the OnlyFans route than she is pretending to be a prosecutor. Misogyny aside, can anyone disagree?

[bambino]

Oh noooo!!!! Tommy took his gloves off!!!! Watch out!!!! Comey and James will have their day in court. Take a deep breath.

[bambino]

Originally Posted by jayzee43

Will this "different prosecutor" actually have any experience, you know, prosecuting people?

I would hope MAGA at least learned that much from this debacle.

https://t.me/realKarliBonne/313368

You won’t understand this. But try

[jayzee43]

Comey and James will remain free as long as trump's incompetence is leading the way. They have absolutely nothing to fear.

By the way, for someone who uses words like "Demtard" and "Libtard" as often as you do, you have no place to lecture anyone on "maturity".

[bambino]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

Can't count on the Grok.

Above could be important. And they wouldn't appeal with a different prosecutor. You mean refile the charges. The appeal is an entirely different monster

You’re wrong, as usual.


Judge Throws Out Comey and Letitia James Indictments Over Illegal Prosecutor Pick — But it ain’t over, so don’t be a Panician

🔻 What Happened

The judge ruled that interim U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan had been unlawfully appointed in violation of federal vacancy statutes that normally require Senate confirmation for U.S. Attorneys. Because Halligan was the only prosecutor who signed both indictments, Judge Currie voided them entirely.

Very important to remember… The dismissals were without prejudice and DID NOT reach the merits or evidence in either case.

🔻 Why There Is Still Room for Optimism?

1. Attorney General Pam Bondi stated the DOJ will appeal both rulings to the Fourth Circuit “within days,” arguing the appointment of Halligan was lawful under emergency provisions or presidential authority. — This was the entire reason it was thrown out, because “Halligan was illegally appointed”

2. Because the dismissals were procedural only and without prejudice, a properly appointed U.S. Attorney can re-indict Comey and James on the EXACT same charges as soon as the appointment issue is fixed.

3. The mortgage-fraud counts against Letitia James remain well within the normal 5–10 year limitations periods, making refiling straightforward.

4. Re: Comey, Although the original five-year clock on most of Comey’s false statements technically expired September 30, 2025, federal law (18 U.S.C. § 3288) gives prosecutors a new SIX-MONTH window to re-indict after a dismissal for technical defects — a window that only started running on November 24. If the appeal succeeds or a new prosecutor acts quickly, Comey can still be re-charged. Also remember, Conspiracy Against Rights restarts the clock everytime they extend the lie… and here he is, doing just that.

5. Neither ruling criticized the strength of the cases; the underlying grand-jury indictments, witness testimony, and documents remain intact and unexamined by any judge.

In short … the indictments are currently dead because of who signed them, not because of what they say. Fix the signature (via appeal or new appointment), and both James Comey and Letitia James will be back to square one. The DOJ has publicly committed to doing exactly that.

https://rumble.com/v727dh8-judge-thr...cases-oit.html

[bambino]

Originally Posted by jayzee43

Comey and James will remain free as long as trump's incompetence is leading the way. They have absolutely nothing to fear.

By the way, for someone who uses words like "Demtard" and "Libtard" as often as you do, you have no place to lecture anyone on "maturity".

I took the gloves off long before you!!!!!


BAHAHAHA

[jayzee43]

So, let's not pretend you hold any moral high ground here. Remember, I'm the one stooping to your level. Don't get it twisted.

[bambino]

Originally Posted by jayzee43

So, let's not pretend you hold any moral high ground here. Remember, I'm the one stooping to your level. Don't get it twisted.

I didn’t lecture you, Mr Gistle did. I just stated the obvious.