Its inexplicable: Obama and Biden had the Epstein files for years

[Lantern2814]

And here we have it. The lefties here DON'T CARE about the reality that Trump did nothing wrong. And they don't care about the victims. Just trying to get Trump. And failing. By the way, since he did nothing wrong it's the left "looking like a pile of dogshit" to use your gutter language. Garland couldn't prosecute Trump because he had NO CASE against him. Per the brave woman who came out publicly and destroyed the left's whole case. And Epstein's case wasn't open at that point. Trump doesn't need cover. Seems quite a few DEMS do...

[Mort Watt]

He was best friends for years with the most notorious sex criminal of our time.

You are known by the company you keep.

Trump is a lyng scumbag pile-of-dogshit con man fascist.

You support him blindly. Nothing he has done or ever will do deters you.

He makes you look bad too.

I'm loving it.

(and this Troll thread!)

[Yssup Rider]

The MAGAdoodles should be fleeing this Titanic disaster. Instead, they’ve shifted their morality to normalize a heinous creep like Trump and fuck anybody who says otherwise.

And they call attention to this utter failure every day. Why post so many blatant troll threads?

It’s inexplicable.

[Hdtown]

The thing is, Obama and Biden name are not going to show up in the files only Diaper Don's, and he should go to prison and be impeached.

[Schwarzer Ritter]

Really? Trump divorces himself from Epstein 20 years earlier and you find that what? Criminal? Immoral? Objectionable? But the democrats were friendly with Epstein AFTER his conviction for things and that includes the Clintons and Plaskett so far.

You have no morals, no character, no conscience, and no platform to stand on. At least a bot has a standard.

[Mort Watt]

Originally Posted by Schwarzer Ritter

Really? Trump divorces himself from Epstein 20 years earlier and you find that what? Criminal? Immoral? Objectionable? But the democrats were friendly with Epstein AFTER his conviction for things and that includes the Clintons and Plaskett so far.

You have no morals, no character, no conscience, and no platform to stand on. At least a bot has a standard.

Awesome. NOW this thread shows its true intent.

You reap what you sow, Schwarz...you've created a "dialog" that is only intended to piss people off.

If you don't like what people post here, howsabout you stop creating these kinds of threads? You are only encouraging this to happen, but Hdtown doesn't deserve this type of response.

[Schwarzer Ritter]

Just calling balls and strikes.....but where is that explanation I'm waiting for?

[txdot-guy]

Its inexplicable: Obama and Biden had the Epstein files for years

I’m not sure of the history here. Bush and Obama and Biden were president during the time Epstein was investigated prosecuted and convicted. But then again so was Trump.

The crimes occurred during Bush’s presidency. The deal that Epstein got occurred in 2007. The prosecutor Acosta that gave him the deal is a long time republican who served under Trump as Secretary of Labor.

This only became a thing because Trump, when asked, told the press that he was going to release the Epstein documents and then changed his mind.

This is a mess of Trump’s own making and has nothing to do with Obama or Biden.

[69in2it69]

Originally Posted by Schwarzer Ritter

Just calling balls and strikes.....but where is that explanation I'm waiting for?

Given on the previous page, sport.


For the effective closing of her case, see here: https://www.politico.com/news/2025/1...ource=openai))


Now who was President when this happens and can now release the information? But won't....gee, wonder why.

[Schwarzer Ritter]

Originally Posted by txdot-guy

Its inexplicable: Obama and Biden had the Epstein files for years

I’m not sure of the history here. Bush and Obama and Biden were president during the time Epstein was investigated prosecuted and convicted. But then again so was Trump.

The crimes occurred during Bush’s presidency. The deal that Epstein got occurred in 2007. The prosecutor Acosta that gave him the deal is a long time republican who served under Trump as Secretary of Labor.

This only became a thing because Trump, when asked, told the press that he was going to release the Epstein documents and then changed his mind.

This is a mess of Trump’s own making and has nothing to do with Obama or Biden.

Acosta was a Florida government officer with a thin connection to Trump when the deal was made. What does that have to do with Trump? Like several sources admitting now, Biden, let me repeat, BIDEN did not release the files and the democrats did not demand their release...until Trump was in office. No, this is a democrat web of intrigue. Imagine that Kameltoe won, would we see any of this?

[Mort Watt]

Originally Posted by Schwarzer Ritter

Just calling balls and strikes....

Right! Good for you! You have a Troll thread to maintain and this kind of "ball and strike calling" will ensure that it remains true to its real intent:

Originally Posted by Schwarzer Ritter

You have no morals, no character, no conscience, and no platform to stand on. At least a bot has a standard.

[Mort Watt]

Originally Posted by Schwarzer Ritter

Acosta was a Florida government officer with a thin connection to Trump when the deal was made. What does that have to do with Trump?....

None whatsoever. I mean, other than his fealty ended up getting him into Trump's cabinet as Secretary of Labor. But I'm sure it was solely due to meritocracy. Nothing to see here! Well...except that he was forced to resign. But really, none of that is significant. Please, this isn't why we are here! Let's get back to the TROLLING!

[CG2014]

I think folks need to know what it means with so many thread using the word:

inexplicable adjective

in·​ex·​pli·​ca·​ble ˌi-nik-ˈspli-kə-bəl

: incapable of being explained, interpreted, or accounted for

: unable to be explained or understood

[Mort Watt]

Originally Posted by CG2014

I think folks need to know what it means with so many thread using the word:

inexplicable adjective

in·​ex·​pli·​ca·​ble ˌi-nik-ˈspli-kə-bəl

: incapable of being explained, interpreted, or accounted for

: unable to be explained or understood

It's why I ain't trying, for sure!

Well...that and I don't care. I'm just welcoming every opportunity to remind MAGA that they unflinchingly support a convict who has lived much of his life as a misogynist douchebag.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by Mort Watt

It's why I ain't trying, for sure!

Well...that and I don't care.

Lol... every time Mort say he doesn't care, he posts up a storm!

He has already commented 14 times in this thread, more than anyone else including the OP.

Seems like he cares a lot!