Its inexplicable: Obama and Biden had the Epstein files for years

[Schwarzer Ritter]

Considering what Obama/Biden did to try to stop Trump (lawfare, Russia, Russia, Russia, civil trials, criminal trials, removal from state ballots, impeachment, assassination and an ongoing campaign of character attacks if there was information acquired during the Obama years, why wasn't it used? I mean if you were facing an angry grizzly bear and you went with rubber bands, spit balls, lawn darts, and a fire extinguisher rather than a .444 Marlin rifle?

This behavior is inexplicable. I want the lefties to explain it.

We can't mention the crimes because of community standards. If you have a question shoot me a private message.

[Mort Watt]

Sure. I'll explain.

It IS inexplicable.

It is.

IT IS!

Because it's a bunch of bullshit.

Who gives a fuck about Obama and Biden? They are losers.

Well, Biden is anyway.

They aren't perverts though.

Epstein was. And Trump was his bestest friend for years.

(oh...and there ain't no crimes by them over this. Which is the real reason why you "can't mention"...community standards my ass)

Now...please explain the inexplicable to us, i.e why you support a lying con man who was best friends for years with the biggest sex criminal of our times. Maybe explain why you overlook his other crimes too.

[farmstud60]

The double standard of the Judicial system in Washington DC has been a growing problem ever since Watergate.


The Epstein case is a mess. All of the big names would get together, but only some knew the secret code to get to the back room of illicit activity. Once some of them found out they just stopped going, but didn't try to condemn the others.


So now you have a situation where probably 50% of the names mentioned never actually went in the back room but if the names are released they will be out of context and people will assume they were in the back room.

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by farmstud60

The double standard of the Judicial system in Washington DC has been a growing problem ever since Watergate.


The Epstein case is a mess. All of the big names would get together, but only some knew the secret code to get to the back room of illicit activity. Once some of them found out they just stopped going, but didn't try to condemn the others.


So now you have a situation where probably 50% of the names mentioned never actually went in the back room but if the names are released they will be out of context and people will assume they were in the back room.

If there was no double standard, Trump would be in prison for the rest of his miserable life.

Irony.

OP is flailing again trying to justify his unwavering support for this wretched despot and the cruel and stupid decisions he makes.

Keep swining MAGAs. You’ll be out before you connect.

[Tiny]

Originally Posted by farmstud60

The double standard of the Judicial system in Washington DC has been a growing problem ever since Watergate.


The Epstein case is a mess. All of the big names would get together, but only some knew the secret code to get to the back room of illicit activity. Once some of them found out they just stopped going, but didn't try to condemn the others.


So now you have a situation where probably 50% of the names mentioned never actually went in the back room but if the names are released they will be out of context and people will assume they were in the back room.

I believe that percentage is a hell of a lot higher than 50%. In fact, we only know the name of one famous person, an English royal, who fits in that category.

That's why, regardless of your political beliefs, you should believe the DOJ shouldn't release the info. Is it normal practice to crucify people who aren't going to be charged in a court of law with a wrongdoing? How would board members feel if their names were on a list of clients of a studio or provider? And LE published their identities with no intention of charging them, because it didn't have sufficient evidence to prosecute?

Bill Clinton's reputation stands a better chance of going up in smoke because of this than Trump's. And Clinton doesn't deserve that. It's irrelevant to his performance as president.

[txdot-guy]

Originally Posted by Tiny

I believe that percentage is a hell of a lot higher than 50%. In fact, we only know the name of one famous person, an English royal, who fits in that category.

That's why, regardless of your political beliefs, you should believe the DOJ shouldn't release the info. Is it normal practice to crucify people who aren't going to be charged in a court of law with a wrongdoing? How would board members feel if their names were on a list of clients of a studio or provider? And LE published their identities with no intention of charging them, because it didn't have sufficient evidence to prosecute?

Bill Clinton's reputation stands a better chance of going up in smoke because of this than Trump's. And Clinton doesn't deserve that. It's irrelevant to his performance as president.

I think the chances of finding any proof of wrongdoing is going to be very slim indeed.

However as a private citizen I would like to know who continued to be associated with Epstein after he was convicted in 2008, who was responsible for getting him his sweet heart deal, and who was taking his money as gifts or political contributions.

In this particular situation hanging around a dirty dog means that you have to deal with the splashback. Regardless of whether you rolled around in the mud with him.

[Schwarzer Ritter]

Originally Posted by Mort Watt

Sure. I'll explain.

It IS inexplicable.

It is.

IT IS!

Because it's a bunch of bullshit.

Who gives a fuck about Obama and Biden? They are losers.

Well, Biden is anyway.

They aren't perverts though.

Epstein was. And Trump was his bestest friend for years.

(oh...and there ain't no crimes by them over this. Which is the real reason why you "can't mention"...community standards my ass)

Now...please explain the inexplicable to us, i.e why you support a lying con man who was best friends for years with the biggest sex criminal of our times. Maybe explain why you overlook his other crimes too.

Didn't see any explanation there but I did see you repeating yourself.

[Schwarzer Ritter]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

If there was no double standard, Trump would be in prison for the rest of his miserable life.

Irony.

OP is flailing again trying to justify his unwavering support for this wretched despot and the cruel and stupid decisions he makes.

Keep swining MAGAs. You’ll be out before you connect.

Unable to answer? Flinging some feces? I could say I expected better but I really didnt...not from you.

[Precious_b]

Pre-trial diversion of parties involved which leads to ruining the case(s).

[Yssup Rider]

They're gonna try and muck up the waters and sleaze out of another possibly criminal activity.

Defend it.

[Schwarzer Ritter]

Still no explanation...

[Yssup Rider]

Why should / would anybody explain it to you? You did such a fine job of describing the issue. Seems like you already have it figgered out.

Silly troll thread.

[Lantern2814]

Yet not one person here has actually answered the question. Just more crying and mud throwing. And the question is legitimate. Why didn't Obama or Biden release those files? Why is it such a huge deal now? Why did every Dem vote AGAINST releasing the files when it was brought up when the vote to reopen the government happened? Trump did nothing wrong. Per the woman referenced in those emails. But the left just keeps flailing....