Epstein, an albatross around Trump's neck

[tommy156]

Originally Posted by oldman2525

lads and lasses? GOD, study your allies son, those terms arent used in widsor, which is in the south england. lads and lasses
are mainly scotland and the upper northern regions of england

This is an awfully funny thing to get worked up about.


Anything to distract from the fact that Dear Leader's name is littered all throughout the Epstein files.

[HDGristle]

It really does look like Trump's signature on that birthday book page is legit

[Iceman]

Originally Posted by txdot-guy

Kash Patel was recently grilled by congress and told the congressmen that no one else was implicated in the Epstein FBI files.

If that’s the case then why was Ghislaine Maxwell convicted for child sex trafficking?

And then why won’t they release the files?


https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisond...-patel-claims/
Epstein Files Don’t Implicate Others In Trafficking Scheme, FBI Chief Patel Claims

The FBI’s files on Jeffrey Epstein do not implicate any of his high-profile friends in the late financier’s sex trafficking scheme, FBI Director Kash Patel—under particular scrutiny after the agency’s investigation into the murder of Charlie Kirk—claimed Tuesday, sparking criticism from Democrats as the Trump administration continues to face scrutiny over its handling of the Epstein files.

Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., questioned Patel during a hearing Tuesday about his knowledge of the Epstein files, asking if the documents showed who else Epstein—who was indicted on sex trafficking charges before dying in prison in 2019—trafficked young women to.

Patel said he reviewed a “good amount” of the agency’s total Epstein files, though not all of them, and there is “no credible information” Epstein “trafficked to other individuals.”

“If there were I would bring the case yesterday,” Patel claimed, though he went on to say the information the FBI has is “limited” and the fact the FBI files don’t implicate any Epstein associates doesn’t mean “others were not involved.”

Patel defended the FBI’s decision not to release its full files on Epstein during his testimony Tuesday, claiming the agency was hamstrung by court rulings and alleging the agency is acting “transparently” by complying with a House subpoena for the full Epstein files.

Click the link to read the full article.

Is it possible that she only procured for Epstein?

Not saying this is true but a possibility.

[txdot-guy]

Originally Posted by Iceman

Is it possible that she only procured for Epstein?

Not saying this is true but a possibility.

It’s a possibility I suppose but Kash Patel is a perjurer in my opinion. He testified before congress that he had not had any discussions about the Epstein files with the president. I don’t buy that for an instant.

It’s still a good idea to release all the information they have collected in my opinion.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by Iceman

Is it possible that she only procured for Epstein?

Not saying this is true but a possibility.

it's quite possible. problem is the left can't accept the possibility that the truth is .. Maxwell was nothing more than a high end madam and Epstein a john and all these sluts were noting more than paid whores.

because that's what they were. paid whores.

people need to stop crying about paid whores being paid whores. everyone on this site is guilty of the same thing as Epstein. paying for pussy.

[onawbtngr546]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

it's quite possible. problem is the left can't accept the possibility that the truth is .. Maxwell was nothing more than a high end madam and Epstein a john and all these sluts were noting more than paid whores.

because that's what they were. paid whores.

people need to stop crying about paid whores being paid whores. everyone on this site is guilty of the same thing as Epstein. paying for pussy.

(Staff edit - Forbidden Subject)

[victoryformation]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

it's quite possible. problem is the left can't accept the possibility that the truth is .. Maxwell was nothing more than a high end madam and Epstein a john and all these sluts were noting more than paid whores.

because that's what they were. paid whores.

people need to stop crying about paid whores being paid whores. everyone on this site is guilty of the same thing as Epstein. paying for pussy.

There Ya Go!
There is a very real possibility that the vast majority of these "victims" ... were not victims at all!
They were well-paid masseuses (who couldn't believe their good fortune) ... who allowed well-heeled gents to grab their ass or
cop a feel!
That was probably the extent of Jeffrey Epstein's "sexual predations"!
They were well-paid, nubile masseuses ... who specialized in happy endings!
(If they were so victimized and preyed upon by Epstein and his cabal ... why did they invite their friends along?)
Another thing: Maybe the reason Bondi/Patal/Blanche are not releasing the remaining 3% of the files is because ... there probably are woman when interviewed freely admitted that they were whores!

[victoryformation]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

it's quite possible. problem is the left can't accept the possibility that the truth is .. Maxwell was nothing more than a high end madam and Epstein a john and all these sluts were noting more than paid whores.

because that's what they were. paid whores.

people need to stop crying about paid whores being paid whores. everyone on this site is guilty of the same thing as Epstein. paying for pussy.

A lot of the women are being extremely disingenuous when they portrait themselves as hapless victims!
A lot of them couldn't believe their good fortune when they were picked up at the trailer park by Epstein's limo ... and chauffeured to Epstein's mansion in South Beach!
(Their jaw probably dropped as the limo pulled into the driveway of Epstein's estate!)
They probably got super excited when the butler opened the door!
That's what's in the unreleased 3% of the files!
(They were recruiting their friends at the trailer park ... on how to make a quick $300 by massaging some rich guy who lives in a mansion in South Beach!)
That's what Bondi doesn't want to come out!

[eyecu2]

Originally Posted by HDGristle

It really does look like Trump's signature on that birthday book page is legit

Of course it is. He knows it, we know it, and even Karoline Levitt knows it. A few MAGA congressmen want to faine that it's not his, but - IT is.

Meanwhile all of the the USA is flamed about late night hosts, FCC licenses, Militarization of cities and the next distraction from the Epstein files. .....we are all still here- waiting for them to be provided.

[Green_Mountain]

Yes very logical.

And kudos to Biden and Kamala for not releasing this damning evidence against Trump before the election.

They took the high road including lawfare, tried to bankrupt, imprison, slander, assassinate twice. Biden and Kamala are kind and noble people.

[Salty Again]

Originally Posted by Green_Mountain

Yes very logical.

And kudos to Biden and Kamala for not releasing this damning evidence against Trump before the election.

They took the high road including lawfare, tried to bankrupt, imprison, slander, assassinate twice. Biden and Kamala are kind and noble people.

... Too right, mate...

ALL that hidden evidence - a treasure-trove that shows
"Trump/Epstein Collusion" - and The Biden Administration
and their FBI and DOJ all decided for the Good of
the country - to NOT disclose any of it.

... The Democrat Government's leaders surely wanted
to "play fair" and didn't want to release the evidence
that would have given Joe and Kamala a unfair advantage
in the upcoming election.

That just wouldn't have been right...
Democrats are honest... ...

##### Salty

[Devo]

20 pages for a nothing burger.

[victoryformation]

I want to know why hapless, preyed-upon "victim" Virginia Giuffre who had a golden opportunity to expose the inner workings of Epstein and his lecherous cabal of sexual predators and advocate for victims of diabolical, sexual predation (she could have written books; appeared on talk shows; gone on lecture tours; appeared before congress) ... chose to take the pipe instead?
(Something doesn't add up!)
There's a lot more to this Epstein story ... that's not being told!

[Salty Again]

Originally Posted by victoryformation

I want to know why hapless, preyed-upon "victim" Virginia Giuffre who had a golden opportunity to expose the inner workings of Epstein and his lecherous cabal of sexual predators and advocate for victims of diabolical, sexual predation (she could have written books; appeared on talk shows; gone on lecture tours; appeared before congress) ... chose to take the pipe instead?
(Something doesn't add up!)
There's a lot more to this Epstein story ... that's not being told!

... And her chance to do that was early-on, mate.

A few of those lovvys were all lined up to tell the tattle
just years ago - and somehow either claimed to be wrong
or exaggerating their past claims.

... I do have a theory about some o' this.
I'll mention it later in the weekend.

#### Salty

[Dr-epg]

#10 - Topics regarding children, and certain images depicting children are not material for an adult-themed board. You must be at least 18 years of age to register and participate here, and along those lines, our subject matter is to surround individuals of the proper age range. Any mention or reference to underage sex is strictly forbidden and may result in loss of your posting privileges.

Thread is closed