Charlie Kirk shot for debatign ideas

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by 1blackman1

The killer said why he killed him. He was tired of Kirk spewing hatred.

if you say so



https://abcnews.go.com/US/students-u...y?id=125663166



Exactly what Robinson was allegedly referring to by "hate" was not clear. Investigators noted that Robinson's mom told them that her son allegedly began having a relationship with his roommate, who is transitioning, and had begun leaning to the left more politically, becoming "more pro-gay and trans-rights oriented," but the document does not indicate the relevance of those stances nor whether Kirk's remarks about those issues were a motivating factor.

Originally Posted by Iceman

I'm curious as to how you think he was stoking hatred. Can you show any examples?

no. he believes you can't criticize anyone. except Trump. you criticize a woman you are misogynistic. you criticize a black woman like that cunt Crockett you are misogynistic and racist. you criticize trans crazies you are homophobic.



this is the way of the "tolerant" left. disagree and be condemned as "hateful, racist, homophobic and xenophobic".



the real hate mongers are always the ones pointing fingers at everyone who doesn't believe what they believe.

[Jacuzzme]

Originally Posted by Iceman

I'm curious as to how you think he was stoking hatred. Can you show any examples?

In thousands of hours of media presence, they’ll clip a few out of context quotes to misrepresent his views. Anyone who actually watches one of his events in totality and comes away with the impression he was “stoking hatred” has got a screw loose.

[RX792P]

Of all people, Tucker Carlson

“You hope that a year from now, the turmoil we're seeing in the aftermath of his murder won't be leveraged to bring hate speech laws to this country,”

“And trust me, if it is, if that does happen, there is never a more justified moment for civil disobedience than that, ever. And there never will be,” the pundit added. “Because if they can tell you what to say, they're telling you what to think...There is nothing they can't do to you because they don't consider you human.”

“This is the Attorney General of the United States, the chief law enforcement officer of the United States, telling you that there is this other category... called hate speech,” Carlson said. “And of course, the implication is that's a crime. There's no sentence that Charlie Kirk would have objected to more than that.”

[Ducbutter]

Originally Posted by Precious_b

REALLY?! Those little maggies doing donnys bidding are working overtime.



Doth Protest too Much. I love that a one word response with a smiley (which I most always add to show humours intention) really got you panties in a wad.

And insult? Since you don't care you don't have to reply because there is no insult that I can see. Y'all righties have expressed that "maggie" is a derogatory term. It is FAR from that. It's slang for your slogan. And y'all love to yell and make a ruckus about it. Just like a bunch of Magpies. Except Magpies are melodious with warbles and songs. And ima sure the educated maggie knows that a term of endearment for Magpie is Maggie.

Get over yourselves and develop a spine. Your skins and egos are as thin as the melange one you adulate.



Never listened to this guy. And this so called arena was not a pit of harmonious ideas. They were a fountain of toxic believes. If you want see a true place for open dialogue, Margret Hoover (?) reboot of William F Buckleys program is a much more adult venue.



I don't know who his "christ" was but it sure wasn't the one of Judeo Christian concept. IMO his combining of religion and politics was pretty volatile.



Ah! I see what you're doing there
Now get those blinders off. The maggies are a much better fit for the profile the FBI presents for the subject of this thread.



I can agree to that. Except there was something about him when it hit the news. The slogan on the canopy said "Prove me wrong." That definitely didn't make me want to be curious about him. The line is just an invitation to only argue a slim point of view. Definitely says narrowminded.



Not justification to do so.



Fact that being anti-gay, abortion, twisted christian values, etc does not equate to stating facts. Except the fact the guy was not really an upstanding person. But who among us is?



Premeditated.

Go home. You're drunk.

[royamcr]

Originally Posted by ICU 812

As this thread's title says, Charlie Kirk was shot for his ideas.

As Rush Limbaugh did before him, Charlie Kirk showed that Democrats, and progressive liberals in general, cannot compete in the arena of ideas. Kirk refuted their agendas in every topic and exposed their mendacious intellectual dishonesty and moral bankruptcy publicly every time he sat under that awning. . . .and they killed him rather than talk with him.

So much for the often expressed desire to " . . .have a conversation about . . ." whatever.

Racism is not an opinion.
Misogyny is not an opinion.
Homophobia is not an opinion.
Transphobia is not an opinion.
Xenophobia is not an opinion.

These are hatred.

[Precious_b]

Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

In thousands of hours of media presence, they’ll clip a few out of context quotes to misrepresent his views. Anyone who actually watches one of his events in totality and comes away with the impression he was “stoking hatred” has got a screw loose.

Oh, you mean like tucky cherry picking those January 6 moments?

Originally Posted by Ducbutter

Go home. You're drunk.

And the reasonings for your postings, sir?