Trump lies not going unnoticed

[VitaMan]

I don't think so Salty.

If you had made the correct expression you would have been enlightened.

I am not even sure Trump made this expression prior to being elected. Can you post one ?

[RX792P]

... And yet - WON a Landslide Election - as Trump claims.
WON all the swing states, that's NO lie...

Landslide?
Not among actual voters
Trump did not even gather a majority of the popular vote
Trump/Vance 49.81%
Harris/Walz 48.34%
Others 1.85%
Arguably in the popular election, slightly more voted against Trump than for Trump.

Electoral college...not sure if less than 60% counts as a 'landslide'.
Trump/Vance 58%
Harris/Walz 42%
Others 0%

[Salty Again]

Originally Posted by RX792P

Landslide?
Not among actual voters
Trump did not even gather a majority of the popular vote
Trump/Vance 49.81%
Harris/Walz 48.34%
Others 1.85%
Arguably in the popular election, slightly more voted against Trump than for Trump.

Electoral college...not sure if less than 60% counts as a 'landslide'.
Trump/Vance 58%
Harris/Walz 42%
Others 0%

... Hee Hee! ... Keep tellin' yerself THAT, mate.
Maybe it makes the LOSING a bit easier to swallow! ...

... Trump's so-called "lies" aint the problem.
It's voters LEAVING the Democrat party in droves!
Trump has stated that those voters are joining
the Republican party - and He aint lying! ...

#### Salty

[69in2it69]

Salty, better be careful mate, Trump surely has taken a poor view at comedians lately!


How to the Fox polls look?


https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.c...11-release.pdf


71% view the economy as only fair or poor...yet the bumbling fool just claimed he'd already solved inflation. The dementia is strong in him.

[Salty Again]

Originally Posted by Salty Again

... Hee Hee! ... Keep tellin' yerself THAT, mate.
Maybe it makes the LOSING a bit easier to swallow! ...

... Trump's so-called "lies" aint the problem.
It's voters LEAVING the Democrat party in droves!
Trump has stated that those voters are joining
the Republican party - and He aint lying! ...

#### Salty

... Hmmm... Not seeing what any of yer comments
have to do with THIS, 69in.

And I don't believe I said anything about Fox News there.
... Just sayin'

#### Salty

[Precious_b]

Originally Posted by Salty Again

... I've been makin' that same facial expression that
President Trump makes since well-BEFORE the election.

... Some six months before - when I told YOU and all
the other liberal lads here that Trump would WIN!

Hmmm... And Trump also told everyone that He would WIN!
... So He wasn't lyin'! ...

#### Salty

Originally Posted by 69in2it69

Salty, better be careful mate, Trump surely has taken a poor view at comedians lately!


How to the Fox polls look?


https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.c...11-release.pdf


71% view the economy as only fair or poor...yet the bumbling fool just claimed he'd already solved inflation. The dementia is strong in him.

Yeah. NaCl-y better be careful.
Some kangaroo kicker made donny cry and says he's gonna tattletell on him when he meets the aussie prez.

[RX792P]

Again?????
A lie or just 'MAGA math'?
Either case, a repeated falsehood and mathematical impossibility.

Trump 9/18/2025:

You understand and we will be reducing drug costs over the next year by not 50 or 60% but by 1000%… Because if you think of a $10 pill -- it will be raised up from 10 to 20 because it's the world versus us, the world is the bigger place.. so it will go from 10 to 20… for them which is bearable. And it will go from 10 to 20 for us.

https://x.com/Acyn/status/1968759275...lled-on-air%2F

Because as a retiree I no longer do 'public math', I asked AI about this 1000% reduction

A reduction of a price by 1000% is mathematically impossible and indicates a fundamental misunderstanding of how percentages work. The maximum possible reduction for a price is 100%, which would make the item free.

The result of a 1000% reduction
If you were to apply the formula for a 1000% reduction, the result would be a negative price, which is not economically logical for a standard transaction.
Using the formula:
New Price = Original Price * (1 - Percentage Reduction)
New Price = Original Price * (1 - 10)
New Price = Original Price * (-9)
For a $100 item, the calculation would be:
\$100 * (-9) = -\$900
This would mean the seller would pay the customer $900 to take the item. While this could happen in rare cases, such as with negative commodity prices for crude oil, it is a mathematical absurdity in a typical retail setting.

https://www.google.com/search?q=what...hrome&ie=UTF-8

[RX792P]

Again?????
A lie or just 'MAGA math'?
Either case, a repeated falsehood and mathematical impossibility.

Trump 9/18/2025:

You understand and we will be reducing drug costs over the next year by not 50 or 60% but by 1000%… Because if you think of a $10 pill -- it will be raised up from 10 to 20 because it's the world versus us, the world is the bigger place.. so it will go from 10 to 20… for them which is bearable. And it will go from 10 to 20 for us.

https://x.com/Acyn/status/1968759275...lled-on-air%2F

Because as a retiree I no longer do 'public math', I asked AI about this 1000% reduction

A reduction of a price by 1000% is mathematically impossible and indicates a fundamental misunderstanding of how percentages work. The maximum possible reduction for a price is 100%, which would make the item free.

The result of a 1000% reduction
If you were to apply the formula for a 1000% reduction, the result would be a negative price, which is not economically logical for a standard transaction.
Using the formula:
New Price = Original Price * (1 - Percentage Reduction)
New Price = Original Price * (1 - 10)
New Price = Original Price * (-9)
For a $100 item, the calculation would be:
\$100 * (-9) = -\$900
This would mean the seller would pay the customer $900 to take the item. While this could happen in rare cases, such as with negative commodity prices for crude oil, it is a mathematical absurdity in a typical retail setting.

https://www.google.com/search?q=what...hrome&ie=UTF-8

[RX792P]

A Florida federal judge on Friday tossed out a 15 billion defamation lawsuit filed by President Donald Trump against The New York Times.

[Salty Again]

Originally Posted by RX792P

A Florida federal judge on Friday tossed out a 15 billion defamation lawsuit filed by President Donald Trump against The New York Times.

... And it will be re-filed and thus submitted again. ...

... Though I have no idea how your post addresses
the thread topic.

#### Salty

[RX792P]

Originally Posted by Salty Again

... And it will be re-filed and thus submitted again. ...

... Though I have no idea how your post addresses
the thread topic.

#### Salty

Maybe it doesn't...so try responding to Trump's lies...uh poor math comprehension...on drug prices (or gas prices or...)

[RX792P]

IRONY...Trump is thy name.

On Friday, Trump took questions from reporters in the Oval Office

So, I think it’s very sad, but I think reporting has to be at least accurate, at least accurate to an extent.

Apparently, not applicable to the President's statements...

[RX792P]

Who's paying the the new White House ballroom?

"I'm paying for it. I'm paying for it,"

Mr. Trump said Tuesday

Is that so????
Donald, you wouldn't be prevaricating again, would you?

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-w...m-donor-names/

Multiple companies have pledged to donate $5 million or more for what was projected to be a $200 million addition to the executive mansion, according to sources familiar with the matter.

Meredith O'Rourke, a top political fundraiser for Mr. Trump, is leading the effort, paired with the Trust for the National Mall, an organization that supports the National Park Service. The trust's nonprofit status means donations come with a federal tax write-off.

Donors are eligible for "recognition associated with the White House Ballroom." What form that recognition takes is still being discussed, but several sources said the expectation is that names will be etched in the ballroom's brick or stone.

Newsmax goes further and puts the current donations at $200 million

With $200 million already pledged for a new White House ballroom, the Trump administration is considering etching donors' names into the building

[Why_Yes_I_Do]

Originally Posted by VitaMan

...Channel 4 Marking Donald Trump's Visit To UK With "Longest Uninterrupted Reel Of Untruths Ever Broadcast On Television"...

Sos yer say'n that the following synopsis: "Channel 4 News, the main news program of the UK's Channel 4, is widely perceived to have a left-leaning bias." is in accurate?!?

[Precious_b]

Originally Posted by RX792P

A Florida federal judge on Friday tossed out a 15 billion defamation lawsuit filed by President Donald Trump against The New York Times.

OH, please supply a link to this. First i've heard of it.

Originally Posted by Salty Again

... And it will be re-filed and thus submitted again. ...

... Though I have no idea how your post addresses
the thread topic.

#### Salty

And maybe a Jean Carroll response with the court will happen

And it slots perfectly with the thread title. Frivolous suit means he ain't putting an honest case for the jury. Just wants the moohlah. He should have done it as prez so he could weild the power of the govt Justice department behind it. But no $$$ for him.

Just a greedy fuck.