Quote:
Originally Posted by HoHound
Trans people are less than 1% of the US population, but are the vast majority of recent mass shooters. Why is this contoversial?
Current Democrat position: We need to advocate more transgenderism and deny that they are mentally ill, jacked up on hormones/drugs, and dangerous to others. I hope that Democrats continue to double down on this position. |
Quote:
Originally Posted by texassapper
I'm not going to bother to explain the joke to you... everytime you write an outburst you make it funnier.
But on the topic of mass shootings, I will educate you on something in math we like to call a ratio.
 |
You shouldn't believe everything you see on Facebook or Instagram. The only true hormone ingesting transgenders on HoHound's image are McKinney, Moseley, and Hale. Carriker is gay and cross dressed from time to time. Aldrich was nonbinary, which means he wanted to be addressed with weird pronouns that aren't feminine or masculine. But he was also anti gay and shot up a gay night club. There's no evidence the rest were trans or gay or bi. There's apparently a photo of Ramos with eyeliner, but that's how Millenials peacock.
McKinney, Mosely, Hale and the Minnesota shooter (who may or may not have taken hormones) all killed people in different years, stretching over 8 years, from 2018 to 2025. This would appear to blow a hole in posters' claims that most recent mass shootings were perpetrated by transgenders. The number of mass shootings (defined as 4 or more people killed) is around 20 to 40 per year, and has been at or above 30 per year since 2021:
https://projects.apnews.com/features...ngs/index.html
But I can't find a single year where more than one hormoned up transgender killed 4 or more people. Maybe another poster could check that and see what he can find.
And why would you count nonbinaries anyway? They're just weird.
And exactly who are you gentlemen proposing to take the guns from anyway? Apparently not just trans people who have undergone hormone therapy or you wouldn't be posting photos of people who don't fit that criterion. Maybe all gay people? How about bi's? That would probably get at least a couple of posters here. The next time Democrats are in power, maybe they'll take the guns away from the rednecks that the Dali Lama mentioned. Or for that matter, maybe they'll take away everyone's guns. Is that what you want? I'm pretty sure you support the 2nd amendment. Or at least I thought you did.
I'd like to see Republicans get more of the LBGTQ vote. It's not going to happen if you fuck over the LBGTQ's. My cousin was a Trump supporter and lifelong Republican. Her son became her daughter, and then the Transphobia in the Republican Party set it. Now she votes a straight Democratic Party ticket.
And you know what, I bet Donald Trump isn't anti-Trans. We know he's not a homophobe or he wouldn't have appointed a gay, married man with children as his Secretary of the Treasury. Poor Trump though probably has to play the game, like he did with the COVID vaccine. He told a group of financial donors recently that he was really proud of Operation Warp Speed, but of course he couldn't say that publicly. Why? Some in the base just aren't rational, like with the trans shooter theories.
