Site Admins need to read everything in a thread before acting

[GhostRiderYYZ]

I recently posted a thread for spa mongers to beware because 1 spa that recently got busted had a girl working the counter who turned out to be XIII in age.

The thread got some replies about this was observed before and posted about. My post may have been the one that posted the girl's numerical age which was reported in the stories I posted links to.

I got dinged for "post about having sex with a minor" was not the post (which is now deleted) I reported what the news stated.

No where in the post was the mention that *I* or anyone else from this site had sex with this person. The NEWS did that.

So to the mod that dinged me, re-read the stories linked

Like this one:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/...180915786.html

[Brooke Wilde]

I don't think we are allowed to even post links in regards to something like that, any form of a discussion is a no-no.

Just like we can't post links to news articles about someone being busted if that person is a member. That example is considered outing.

[GhostRiderYYZ]

Originally Posted by Brooke Wilde

I don't think we are allowed to even post links in regards to something like that, any form of a discussion is a no-no.

Just like we can't post links to news articles about someone being busted if that person is a member. That example is considered outing.

Posting about a spa that got busted happens a lot on here and the yahoo article points out a "concerned citizen" outed them (wonder who that one)

by posting about the place and most likely the REASON they got busted I pointed out that if you walk in and see someone who looks too young it would be best to turn around and leave.

[Unique_Carpenter]

Brooke is correct sortof.
Anything related to younger generation anything is a nuclear guideline violation.
I'm surprised you didn't get a band camp award. I assume the mod was cutting you a break.

[tatted up mescan]

Just the mention of a minor in any context gets pointed.

[Michael8219]

I minored in pointing in college

[Busty]

Let's read it

[tatted up mescan]

So that rule does not apply in this case, I don’t believe anyone mentioned minor s*x, did however mention an underage person inside an establishment but not as a provider.

[GhostRiderYYZ]

Originally Posted by Busty

Let's read it

That is why this thread was given its name. I *NEVER* said the person in question was engaging in sex acts. Just that it was reported an underage person was working there. I never mentioned any sexual acts. The article in the news is assuming (and we all know how that word can be dissected) the underaged person was performing sex acts. Because it fits their narrative.

I am chalking it up to "not a place to bring your daughter to work day"

[Unique_Carpenter]

Fyi,

No mention of minors is allowed under any context whatsoever.

[GhostRiderYYZ]

Originally Posted by Unique_Carpenter

Fyi,

No mention of minors is allowed under any context whatsoever.

Blame the ones that posted reviews about the place that mentioned some young looking girl.

its not like we don't know the cops are trolling these forums. They see a post about some spa having a young girl working there and next thing you know they are checking the place out.

Truth be told we should not be posting reviews of Brick and mortal spas. or at least forbid any mention of any activity.

[tatted up mescan]

It is what it is I reckon

[txdot-guy]

Is pregnancy a safe topic or does that violate rule #10? This is a serious question, I am actually curious.

[GhostRiderYYZ]

I had a weird thought about this: We might be seeing more things like that happen because if they cannot put the kid in daycare or get a relative to watch their kid.... well what option do they have?

[GhostRiderYYZ]

Asian women good at hiding their age.
There are 2 Asian porn stars out there that when they got into the porn business they were 18.

Amai Liu who was born Feb 14th 1990 & at the time is 4'11" weighing about 85 lbs. Even today at 35 years age she weight 100 lbs, and is 5 foot.

Kitty Jung born 10/24/1984 4'!1" under 100 lbs.

I would post links to their photos but because even today when they are 35 + they STILL look barely legal.

And I speak for a LOT of mongers in here when I say that had you walked into a SPAMP and she was the girl that walked up and let you into the back area you would have gone no questions asked.