President Trump Tells AG Bondi To Release Grand Jury Testimony

[Iceman]

Those who dislike Trump have already stated their beliefs that Trump was involved, and even if the "records" don't show that he was, they will say they were doctored. They cannot be convinced otherwise.

If there is proof that he was involved, then I believe that he should be removed from office and prosecuted.

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by Iceman

Those who dislike Trump have already stated their beliefs that Trump was involved, and even if the "records" don't show that he was, they will say they were doctored. They cannot be convinced otherwise.

If there is proof that he was involved, then I believe that he should be removed from office and prosecuted.

Yet you have just stated that you think people won't believe any proof that's provided. So do you think limiting the release to the documents that Trump deems as "pertinent" will satisfy you? Or will the coverup continue?

Make up your mind, bro.

[IAmReallyIronman]

[1blackman1]

Originally Posted by Iceman

Those who dislike Trump have already stated their beliefs that Trump was involved, and even if the "records" don't show that he was, they will say they were doctored. They cannot be convinced otherwise.

If there is proof that he was involved, then I believe that he should be removed from office and prosecuted.

Similarly to How Trump supporters claimed without evidence and still do that Joe Biden was corrupt. Oh the irony.

[victoryformation]

Don't be a bit surprised if there's a Mossad connection here!
The FBI found a fake Austrian passport in his safe!
(Do you have any idea how connected you gotta be to acquire a fake passport?)

[chefnerd]

There is atually nothing to be revealed fron the Grand Jury testimony. It will only apply to the allegaitons for which Epetein and Ghiswall were convicted. It will NOT NOT NOT have anything to do with the actual files

[Precious_b]

Originally Posted by Iceman

Those who dislike Trump have already stated their beliefs that Trump was involved, and even if the "records" don't show that he was, they will say they were doctored. They cannot be convinced otherwise.

If there is proof that he was involved, then I believe that he should be removed from office and prosecuted.

And there are those that love the donny who are getting in lock step with the ones you mention.

Originally Posted by IAmReallyIronman

[Iceman]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Yet you have just stated that you think people won't believe any proof that's provided. So do you think limiting the release to the documents that Trump deems as "pertinent" will satisfy you? Or will the coverup continue?

Make up your mind, bro.

If all the documents were released and there was no evidence of Trump doing anything illegal, would you accept that or say they were doctored?

Some have already claimed that Trump's involvement was being removed from the files, so that seems pretty obvious to me that they will not believe that Trump was not involved no matter what is released.

As I said, if he is guilty remove him from office and prosecute him. I'm not looking for satisfaction, just the truth.

[victoryformation]

The passenger manifest on Epstein's "Lolita Express" 727 destined for Lolita Island ...will be most-telling!
(I don't think the lecherous old farts were going there for snorkeling lessons!)

[victoryformation]

If only the names of pussy-loving democrats appeared in the FBI files ... lackies Bondi and Patel would have released them forthwith!

[victoryformation]

The original "Lolita" Virginia Giuffre (who blew the case open)...was a locker room attendant at Mar-a-Lago!
She was subsequently recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell!

[VitaMan]

She is dead, by suicide.


Conspiracy theorists are never satisfied. If there is ever an Epstein list released, the next question is
what was their involvement with Epstein.

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by Iceman

If all the documents were released and there was no evidence of Trump doing anything illegal, would you accept that or say they were doctored?

Some have already claimed that Trump's involvement was being removed from the files, so that seems pretty obvious to me that they will not believe that Trump was not involved no matter what is released.

As I said, if he is guilty remove him from office and prosecute him. I'm not looking for satisfaction, just the truth.

If ALL of the documents are released and Trump was not implicated, I would accept it of course. That said, do you believe that Trump is above modifying or doctoring the files and grand jury testimony?

Weather maps and tournament scorecards aside, of course...

[victoryformation]

Trump and Bondi are covering for somebody!
Somebody big!
The Mossad could have gotten to them!
Former Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak is up to his eye balls in all of this!
He got 3 million from Epstein!
(For what?)
Was he extorting him?
Was he going to expose Epstein as a Mossad agent?
Did he with his connections to Mossad get Epstein the fake Austrian passport?
Was Barak a closet pedofile?
(I guarantee you his name is on various "Lolita Express" passenger manifests!)
If any of this came to light ... it would not look good for a former prime minister of America's closest ally!
Something to think about!

[Budman]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

If ALL of the documents are released and Trump was not implicated, I would accept it of course. That said, do you believe that Trump is above modifying or doctoring the files and grand jury testimony?

Weather maps and tournament scorecards aside, of course...

I don't believe you would. Not for a second. My question to you and all the libs salivating over this is don't you think if there was damning evidence against Trump the Bidens would have used it for their October surprise?