Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 650
MoneyManMatt 490
Jon Bon 408
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
George Spelvin 315
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Starscream66 301
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
sharkman29 263
Top Posters
DallasRain71340
biomed167774
Yssup Rider62904
gman4455035
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling49505
WTF48272
pyramider46429
bambino45243
The_Waco_Kid39966
CryptKicker37395
Mokoa36499
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Dr-epg34350

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-07-2025, 10:55 PM   #16
Yssup Rider
Valued Poster
 
Yssup Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 62,904
Encounters: 68
Default

It’s another MAGA ploy to steal another election.

We hve never heard this song before.
Yssup Rider is offline   Quote
Old 04-08-2025, 06:44 AM   #17
Iceman
Valued Poster
 
Iceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 368
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by txdot-guy View Post
Do you or anyone have any proof that the democrats ginned up 5000 to 10000 false or forged votes. Of course you don’t. No one ever does.

There are 65,000 ballots that are being contested. The voters who cast their ballots didn’t do anything wrong or anything that they had not done before in earlier elections.

If my vote got thrown out because of a technicality I would be extremely upset. Just another way that the voter ID movement is screwing the voting public.
If a "technicality" is required, then it needs to be completed for the ballot to be counted. How many criminals have been set free because of a technicality?
Iceman is offline   Quote
Old 04-08-2025, 07:00 AM   #18
Salty Again
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 26, 2021
Location: down under Pittsburgh
Posts: 11,969
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iceman View Post
If a "technicality" is required, then it needs to be completed for the ballot to be counted. How many criminals have been set free because of a technicality?
... Exactly! ... What could be more fair than that? ...

#### Salty
Salty Again is offline   Quote
Old 04-08-2025, 08:30 AM   #19
txdot-guy
Lifetime Premium Access
 
txdot-guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 3,771
Default

The process continues.


https://www.carolinajournal.com/stat...ction-dispute/

State Supreme Court presses pause on Griffin-Riggs election dispute

The North Carolina Supreme Court issued a stay order Monday in the election dispute involving a seat on the state’s highest court. The decision essentially presses pause in the dispute pitting Republican candidate Jefferson Griffin against the State Board of Elections and Democratic candidate Allison Riggs.

Riggs and the elections filed separate requests Sunday for a temporary stay. In separate court filings, Riggs and the elections board also seek an order called a writ of supersedeas.
txdot-guy is online now   Quote
Old 04-08-2025, 08:43 AM   #20
txdot-guy
Lifetime Premium Access
 
txdot-guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 3,771
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iceman View Post
If a "technicality" is required, then it needs to be completed for the ballot to be counted. How many criminals have been set free because of a technicality?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Salty Again View Post
... Exactly! ... What could be more fair than that? ...

#### Salty
You should read about the technicality before agreeing with the argument.

The complaint is not that the ballot is invalid but that a duly registered voter is invalid. Because a piece of information is left off of their voter registration.

What makes this argument even more absurd is that they aren’t going to invalidate this registered voter’s entire ballot but only the one for the race in question. Leaving the votes for other races and candidates as valid.

If they want these voter registrations to be fixed then they should invalidate the registration and have that voter fix their registration for future elections.

Using this as an excuse to throw out a single vote for a single candidate is not a reasonable response and appears to be suspect in its entirety.
txdot-guy is online now   Quote
Old 04-08-2025, 09:19 AM   #21
Yssup Rider
Valued Poster
 
Yssup Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 62,904
Encounters: 68
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by txdot-guy View Post
You should read about the technicality before agreeing with the argument.

The complaint is not that the ballot is invalid but that a duly registered voter is invalid. Because a piece of information is left off of their voter registration.

What makes this argument even more absurd is that they aren’t going to invalidate this registered voter’s entire ballot but only the one for the race in question. Leaving the votes for other races and candidates as valid.

If they want these voter registrations to be fixed then they should invalidate the registration and have that voter fix their registration for future elections.

Using this as an excuse to throw out a single vote for a single candidate is not a reasonable response and appears to be suspect in its entirety.
Amen!

Not voter fraud, but election fraud. Another attempt by the MAGAS to steal another election.
Yssup Rider is offline   Quote
Old 04-08-2025, 07:24 PM   #22
Lantern2814
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2018
Location: Somewhere off Mogo
Posts: 628
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider View Post
Amen!

Not voter fraud, but election fraud. Another attempt by the MAGAS to steal another election.
More lies. We know you lefties HATE it when ballots are actually verified. How DARE Republicans want elections to be fair and legal. Voter ID is coming too.
Lantern2814 is offline   Quote
Old 04-08-2025, 08:04 PM   #23
The_Waco_Kid
AKA ULTRA MAGA Trump Gurl
 
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: The MAGA Zone
Posts: 39,966
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lantern2814 View Post
More lies. We know you lefties HATE it when ballots are actually verified. How DARE Republicans want elections to be fair and legal. Voter ID is coming too.

Amen


the left is never about democracy. they are about control and manipulation. and they hate anything to do with law and order.
The_Waco_Kid is offline   Quote
Old 04-08-2025, 10:24 PM   #24
Schwarzer Ritter
Valued Poster
 
Schwarzer Ritter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 5, 2025
Location: Springfield
Posts: 468
Encounters: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by txdot-guy View Post
You should read about the technicality before agreeing with the argument.

The complaint is not that the ballot is invalid but that a duly registered voter is invalid. Because a piece of information is left off of their voter registration.

What makes this argument even more absurd is that they aren’t going to invalidate this registered voter’s entire ballot but only the one for the race in question. Leaving the votes for other races and candidates as valid.

If they want these voter registrations to be fixed then they should invalidate the registration and have that voter fix their registration for future elections.

Using this as an excuse to throw out a single vote for a single candidate is not a reasonable response and appears to be suspect in its entirety.

This race has not been decided yet. If the margins are large enough I'm sure that others will challenge the results.
Schwarzer Ritter is offline   Quote
Old 04-09-2025, 11:50 AM   #25
Yssup Rider
Valued Poster
 
Yssup Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 62,904
Encounters: 68
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lantern2814 View Post
More lies. We know you lefties HATE it when ballots are actually verified. How DARE Republicans want elections to be fair and legal. Voter ID is coming too.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAA!

Trump is still bitching about ballots from 2016!

Haven't heard too much whining about 2024 though. Aside from the downballot races that Leon couldn't buy.

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH!
Yssup Rider is offline   Quote
Old 04-09-2025, 03:55 PM   #26
Schwarzer Ritter
Valued Poster
 
Schwarzer Ritter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 5, 2025
Location: Springfield
Posts: 468
Encounters: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider View Post
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAA!

Trump is still bitching about ballots from 2016!

Haven't heard too much whining about 2024 though. Aside from the downballot races that Leon couldn't buy.

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH!
2016....are you sure?
Schwarzer Ritter is offline   Quote
Old 04-13-2025, 07:35 AM   #27
txdot-guy
Lifetime Premium Access
 
txdot-guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 3,771
Default

See below for an excerpt from the article. You should read the full article. There is a lot more detailed information on the case within.

https://www.carolinajournal.com/top-...hers-in-doubt/

Top NC court upholds 60K votes challenged by Griffin, leaves others in doubt

The North Carolina Supreme Court split 4-2 Friday afternoon in a decision designed to resolve the dispute over last fall’s high court election. A unanimous court agreed that more than 60,000 ballots cast by voters with incomplete voter registration records should count. But the fate of 5,700 other challenged ballots remains uncertain.
…..

“Under this court’s longstanding precedent, mistakes made by negligent election officials in registering citizens who are otherwise eligible to vote ‘will not deprive the [citizens] of [their] right to vote or render [their] vote[s] void after [they have] been cast,’” the court order explained.

“To the extent that the registrations of voters in the first category are incomplete, the Board is primarily, if not totally, responsible,” the Supreme Court majority agreed.

The elections board learned about the problems with voter registration in 2023 but “did nothing … to ensure that any past violations were remedied,” the order explained.

“The board’s inattention and failure to dutifully conform its conduct to the law’s requirements is deeply troubling,” the Supreme Court majority wrote. “Nevertheless, our precedent on this issue is clear. Because the responsibility for the technical defects in the voters’ registration rests with the Board and not the voters, the wholesale voiding of ballots cast by individuals who subsequently proved their identity to the Board by complying with the voter identification law would undermine the principle that ‘this is a government of the people, in which the will of the people — the majority — legally expressed, must govern.’”

….
txdot-guy is online now   Quote
Old 04-13-2025, 10:57 AM   #28
Salty Again
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 26, 2021
Location: down under Pittsburgh
Posts: 11,969
Default

:... Good for them! .. . This is what we wanted to happen.
The ballot challenge was heard - and they made the decision
that most of the ballots had small issue or so - that doesn't
seem to matter (do they really need to add their driver's
license info to the ballot? - WHY??).

Seems like a reasonable decision from a mostly
Republican Court.

Now, we'll see about the 5,000 or so OTHER ballots
and whether or not THEY pass muster.

#### Salty
Salty Again is offline   Quote
Old 04-14-2025, 08:35 AM   #29
Yssup Rider
Valued Poster
 
Yssup Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 62,904
Encounters: 68
Default

Winning?
Yssup Rider is offline   Quote
Old 05-07-2025, 11:51 PM   #30
txdot-guy
Lifetime Premium Access
 
txdot-guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 3,771
Default

Republican concedes long-unsettled North Carolina court election to Democratic incumbent

The North Carolina Supreme Court election was the last 2024 race nationally that was undecided.

The Republican challenger for a North Carolina Supreme Court seat conceded last November’s election on Wednesday to Democratic incumbent Allison Riggs, two days after a federal judge ruled that potentially thousands of disputed ballots challenged by Jefferson Griffin must remain in the final tally.

In a statement provided by his campaign to The Associated Press, Griffin said he would not appeal Monday’s decision by U.S. District Judge Richard Myers, who also ordered that the State Board of Elections certify results that show Riggs is the winner by 734 votes from over 5.5 million ballots cast in the race.

Read the entire article here:
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/0...ncede-00332704
txdot-guy is online now   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved