Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacuzzme
Story is falling apart like a 74 Pinto. Clearly DC politicians shouldn’t be using the Signal app, apparently a common practice that needs to be stopped.
|
indeed it is ....
Quote:
Originally Posted by HDGristle
|
follow the breadcrumbs .. it leads to a nothing burger
once again The Atlantic played you fellers bigly
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattve...story-n2654510
Did You Notice What Vanished From The Atlantic's Narrative About the Hegseth Signal Story?
The Atlantic felt their story was dying. The Trump administration said no classified war plans were discussed in the Signal chat story that’s captured the hyper-regional confines of liberal America. It looks like a nothing burger vis-à-vis a severe breach in classified information, though still an unforced error on behalf of top officials. To recap, The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg was accidentally added to a group chat on the encrypted messenger app, which was pre-downloaded on the devices of those involved in the chat, which included CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, National Security Adviser Michael Waltz, and Vice President JD Vance.
https://x.com/Taylor47/status/1904874968581632040
The Atlantic has already abandoned their bullshit “war plans” narrative, and in releasing the full chat , they concede they LIED to perpetuate yet ANOTHER hoax on the American people. What scumbags!
The hook was that classified war plans were discussed, and Mr. Ratcliffe shot down a claim. There was nothing classified, Jeff, so release the texts. At first, he decided not to do it, simply claiming his detractors were wrong—a typical response when fake news is knowingly peddled.
So, The Atlantic
opted to publish the text they felt was classified, though it wasn’t, and two things were clear: these aren’t war plans, and
that narrative has conspicuously vanished.
https://x.com/MostlyPeacefull/status...story-n2654510
Notice the narrative shift. First it was “top secret”, then it was “classified”, now it’s “sensitive”
https://x.com/townhallcom/status/1904896703322268149
Are these “war plans?”
https://x.com/davereaboi/status/1904...story-n2654510
Ok so the Atlantic released what they call the “war plans”—they’re depending on people not knowing (or caring) what this is, but to refer to it that way is a stretch. There’s nothing specific here, other than times at which events will occur. A leak of this kind could alert the enemy, but doesn’t tell them anything about what’s coming, where or how to prepare for it.
Nothingburger.
Now, this isn’t a one-sided deal. Again, this was a brutal, unforced error, adding a known Trump-hater to this chat. This administration dodged a significant bullet and was lucky that no classified information was disclosed. Then again, in the chats, all the principals are aware of the “high side” lines of communications, secure platforms where deeper discussions could occur.
The chats are real, so it’s not a hoax, but the ‘they disclosed classified war plans’ narrative is fake news and hyper-sensationalized. The White House did well to notice how the words “war plans” got stealth edited in the new disclosures, pointing to a tacit acknowledgement that the publication got ahead of their skis on this one, which is a common trait at The Atlantic:
https://x.com/TomBevanRCP/status/190...story-n2654510
Many things can be true at once. 1) Jeffrey Goldberg is a clear Trump hater. 2) Goldberg has published sensationalized accounts in the past that have been disputed by people with first-hand knowledge. 3) He was added to this chat and has receipts, so it’s not a hoax.
Editor's Note: This leaked Signal chat is a non-scandal, and we need to focus on the real issues, not the Regime Media and Democrats' invented outrage.
