What about the Texas anti-John law now in effect

[BigDeal]

Hey Crypt
Your deletion and post in red says targeting is
NOW allowed.
Soooo I guess we are now Gucci to slap each other around like the old days huh?
Lol

[AsianLuver]

In the early 1900s, we started the War on Booze. In the 60s, we started the War on Drugs. Having lost both of those, now the puritans move to the War on Sex. Surely we will win this one right? After all, it is the oldest vice and profession.

Right now, there is a tremendous labor shortage so lets make everyone felons so no one is qualified to work anywhere.

[Boredinop]

It’s already having an effect. Lot of VERY well known ladies in Texas are now posting they are going UTR, only seeing regulars, etc. There is also a lot trying to get dumb f#!*s to pay for Onlyfans . If only the authorities would concentrate on true crime.....

[AsianLuver]

Authorities may not even want this stupid law. In a day where there isn't supposed to be any bias, isn't this just a whole bunch of gender bias? Take two people who are both willfully participating and criminalize only one. How is that "equal treatment"? The best we can hope for is that the courts will strike for that reason, but I doubt it. They always say there is no justice in court.

[AsianLuver]

Originally Posted by Boredinop

It’s already having an effect. Lot of VERY well known ladies in Texas are now posting they are going UTR, only seeing regulars, etc. There is also a lot trying to get dumb f#!*s to pay for Onlyfans . If only the authorities would concentrate on true crime.....

I am not sure why these ladies would be doing that. They are not at risk if the whole thing is being blamed on men.

[Boredinop]

They are going after the ladies as well then trying to get them to “cooperate”... giving up names etc.

[Unique_Carpenter]

Originally Posted by Unique_Carpenter

....We hit Dallas over the holiday weekend, and various fantasy folks we both know thereabouts all said no issues with taking spouse of the hour to dinners or movies if that's not a "first" date night with that person. However first dates have a much increased level of screening.

Quoting myself...
.

Originally Posted by Boredinop

It’s already having an effect. Lot of VERY well known ladies in Texas are now posting they are going UTR, only seeing regulars, etc....

Correct.
.

Originally Posted by Boredinop

They are going after the ladies as well then trying to get them to “cooperate”... giving up names etc.

Correct.
.

[AsianLuver]

Originally Posted by Unique_Carpenter

Quoting myself...
.

Correct.
.

Correct.
.

Well, the ladies aren't going to end up felons for cooperating. They are cooperating to get a pass from it. That is the idea. At the end, the ladies get out with a pass...and move on to the next gig. The men get hung with a felony rap. This is so radically unfair. I cant believe we are doing shit like this in this country.

Actually, thinking about this more, while it is completely unfair and unreasonable to felonize someone when there is no victim, there is a bigger agenda. What cant felons do? Cant vote. Cant own a gun. This law will begin marginalizing a segment of society they want silenced anyway. Gun toting rednecks who like their titty bars and hoes. Now, they have no say and no gun either.

I would expect the women the TX legislature to be in favor of something so blatantly gender biased, but I cant believe the men in the legislature were stupid enough to vote for it. I read it was unanimous. But I have had MO congressmen tell me they voted YES on similar sex-related legislation when they really disagreed with it. They said they would be lambasted for taking exception. They actually admitted that to me. I offered to buy them a copy of JFK's Profiles in Courage for an enlightening read.

[CryptKicker]

Originally Posted by BigDeal

Hey Crypt
Your deletion and post in red says targeting is
NOW allowed.
Soooo I guess we are now Gucci to slap each other around like the old days huh?
Lol

Well that was a lovely spell check oops from my phone! LOL

Of course it's NOT allowed.

[royamcr]

Originally Posted by Big Ed

Since they're not locking people up for weed in Texas much anymore and since we have very lax gun laws now there should be room freeing up in the jail soon. I read on Wikipedia that no man has ever been arrested for buying sex in Sweden. European laws are less harsh so there I guess the men just get fined. I imagine you'd have to look towards the Middle East to find more comparable laws.

It seems like the lieutenant governor Dan Patrick is the main force behind this amendment. Seems like he teamed up with some liberal Democrat feminist type women to make it happen. While no one voted against the law the amendment to make this a felony was passed on a committee with suspended rules and given the chaos in the final days of the Texas 2021 legislature I don't think too many people read this law before signing it.

It is one of those subjects that no politician wants to be seen promoting. It is easier to make a law to outlaw the activity vs be seen as being on the legalization side. Women voters see hookers as being a sex outlet for their men. They lose control of the pussy in the relationship if men can get it some other way.

[JRLawrence]

Originally Posted by BigDeal

Couple of thoughts here
Please dont use the term "gals" unless you are over the age 80.

Thank you...lol
....!

What? I am not 80 yet, not quite. But I do know that "gals" is a common term that is still used in Oklahoma, Texas, New Mexico, and Arizona. I never heard the term in the New York area and other places in the East. Thus, the comment kinda sounds like you could have been raised in one of the Yankee type of states.

[kcpitchreader]

Originally Posted by JRLawrence

What? I am not 80 yet, not quite. But I do know that "gals" is a common term that is still used in Oklahoma, Texas, New Mexico, and Arizona. I never heard the term in the New York area and other places in the East. Thus, the comment kinda sounds like you could have been raised in one of the Yankee type of states.

Perhaps, but gals went out of proper usage in the ‘70s…best not to use it in any setting so you don’t use it in the workplace, etc…it is considered derogatory…