https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world...cwX?li=BBnb7Kz
                                     
   
                                                                                                                
                             North Korea’s ‘monster’ missile sends menacing message to next U.S. president             
     
                                      TOKYO —Four months after Barack Obama took office as U.S.  president, North Korea catapulted itself to the top of the diplomatic  agenda with its second nuclear test. Now less than a month before the  latest U.S. election, North Korea has given whoever wins advance notice:  in 2021, it is certain to be back in the headlines, and likely to be a  headache. 
     

    © AP/AP  Powered by Microsoft News   The reason: a massive, new intercontinental ballistic paraded through  the streets of Pyongyang on Saturday that served as a chilling reminder  that North Korea’s nuclear deterrent is a very real threat to the U.S.  homeland. 
             
 “What I think the North Koreans are saying is that they are committed  to spending the money to build systems that can beat our missile  defenses,” said Jeffrey Lewis, director of the East Asia  Nonproliferation Program at the Center for Nonproliferation Studies in  Monterey, Calif. “Maybe a lot of them won’t get through, but some of  them will, and, you know, we won’t like that.” 
At Saturday’s military parade, North Korea unveiled a range of modern  military equipment that has never been seen before, from small arms to  masks designed for chemical warfare, and a new submarine-launched  ballistic missile. But the climax was the sight of a new ICBM, carried  on an 11-axle vehicle, one of the largest road-mobile liquid-fueled  ballistic missiles ever made. 
In a speech before the parade,  North Korea leader Kim Jong Un said that the country’s military forces  were meant as a deterrent and were not aimed “at anyone specific.” But  experts said the hardware on display told a different story. 
“Of  course, the target is clearly the United States,” said Lee Ho-ryung, a  researcher at the state-run Korea Institute for Defense Analyses in  Seoul. “There’s no need for North Korea develop a bigger and stronger  ICBM if it’s truly intended for self-defense only.” 
In the past,  North Korea has sometimes paraded missiles that looked more like  mock-ups than the genuine article, and it has occasionally taken months  or even years for the missiles to be tested after they were shown. 
On Monday, South Korea’s military expressed concern but said it was  still trying to determine if the new ICBM was the real thing. The  Institute for National Security Strategy, affiliated to Seoul’s spy  agency, said the fact the missile had not yet been tested showed it was  “intended more as a political showoff than for actual battle usage.” 
But  independent experts said the missile looked genuine, and probably  represented the “new strategic weapon” Kim had boasted about at the turn  of the year — the product of a renewed focus on developing missile  technology. 
The previously largest ICBM, the Hwasong-15, was  tested in November 2017, and has a predicted range of around 8,000  miles, meaning it could already reach the entire continental United  States. The new missile is longer and thicker, meaning it could  potentially carry more fuel and/or bigger engines. 
“Because they  don’t need to go any farther, this is really about putting more weight  in the payload,” said Melissa Hanham, deputy director of the Open  Nuclear Network. 
In other words, Hanham says, this is a missile  designed to carry either multiple nuclear warheads, or what experts call  “penetration aids,” decoys that confuse defense interceptor missiles  such as chaff or reflective balloons. 
The United States and  Russia have produced much larger solid-fueled ICBMs stored in silos, but  North Korea prefers the mobility and unpredictability of transportable  liquid-fueled rockets. 
     

    © -/AFP/Getty Images  This from North Korea's official Korean Central News Agency (KCNA)  shows the military parade during a ceremony to mark the 75th anniversary  of the Workers' Party of Korea in Pyongyang, Octy. 10, 2020.   This approach does have drawbacks, though: the liquid propellant is  volatile, and the missile would normally only be fueled just before  firing. The fueling process involves time, people and a convoy of fuel  trucks, giving the United States a window to destroy it on the ground. 
“The  huge liquid-fueled ICBM is certainly cumbersome and dangerous to  operate — and prone to preemption — but it is still better for North  Korea than a fixed, silo-based ICBM, whose location would be known to  the United States at all times,” said Ankit Panda, a senior fellow at  the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. 
Panda said his  preliminary analysis showed the missile could potentially carry three or  four of North Korea’s nuclear warheads. That presents a massive  security headache to the United States, and a huge financial burden to  its missile defense system based in Alaska. 
         
                               
     
Reports from samantha bee and kathy griffin indicate that joey and hoey are in contact with Kim and xi for test sites for the missile on american soil - Middle american cities  (other than liberal Denver) are being discussed for maximum benefit to the new Union of socialist states of amerika under Xi and Putin.  minneapolis - already devastated - may be a test site  - to be totally levelled and then rebuilt as a model after PolPot of Cambodia. Conservative nebraska towns - Omaha and lincoln - as likely - due to the effect on the education system in nebraska and destruction of food supply.  as Bernie states - 'Bread Lines are a good thing"!!!
So is living under mutation generating radiation.  Bernie needs more chronically ill people for his One payer - no care system.