Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > Texas > Dallas > Coed Discussions - Dallas
test
Coed Discussions - Dallas Both male and female members can mingle and interact here. Let's keep these discussions on-topic, thought-provoking, and more importantly...entertaining!

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 650
MoneyManMatt 490
Jon Bon 408
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
George Spelvin 318
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Starscream66 304
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
sharkman29 263
Top Posters
DallasRain71391
biomed168244
Yssup Rider62981
gman4455126
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling49554
WTF48272
pyramider46430
bambino45243
The_Waco_Kid40263
CryptKicker37409
Mokoa36512
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Dr-epg34986

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-30-2020, 07:04 PM   #31
futbolhead
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 24, 2010
Location: dfw
Posts: 192
Encounters: 14
Default

70% is the number that Angela Merkel, a scientist, used back in January/February when outlining the sobering likelihood of German citizens who would eventually become infected. It is also being reported by the US scientists. If that number is close to accurate and we maintain the 4.96% death rate of those who become infected, then my numbers are accurate. Do I think 11,000,000+ US citizens die? Not really, but it’s possible if we don’t get our shit together. Trying to con our citizens doesn’t help and that’s what the R’s have been focused on from jump.
The reality is that the herd immunity doesn’t hold up because there is little data that the antibodies help much past a few months. And if we’re waiting on a vaccine, keep waiting, we haven’t created vaccines for h1n1, Ebola, swine flu or aids though a lot of resources have been thrown at them too. It would be nice but it isn’t something to count on. The most likely solution is improving behaviors and treatments.
Full disclosure? I received my own test results back this morning and I’m positive for this shit. Lol, so I have a couple of lonely weeks in front of me until I can knock out a couple of negative tests. I’m healthy and stay in good shape so I’m only minimally concerned. But, it makes you wonder when 2 people in their 30’s, 3 in their 40’s and 2 in their 50’s died from it over the last 24hrs in Dallas county.
futbolhead is offline   Quote
Old 06-30-2020, 07:21 PM   #32
DFWClubgoer
Babtized in dirty water 💦
 
DFWClubgoer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 29, 2010
Location: Euless
Posts: 727
Encounters: 91
Default

Statistics, and people say numbers don’t lie! Just depends on the order you put them in the equation.
DFWClubgoer is offline   Quote
Old 07-01-2020, 04:50 AM   #33
adav8s28
Valued Poster
 
adav8s28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 4, 2011
Location: sacremento
Posts: 3,885
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by futbolhead View Post
I see what you did. You made up an extremely high asymptomatic number and entered it in as though it’s relevant. Almost as though asymptomatic cases aren’t included in the case numbers.
I didn't make up the asymptomatic number. It came from the CDC. Your Mortality rate calculation is not accurate, because you don't include the number of asymptomatics in your calculation. For the number of people infected, you are only counting those with symptoms. The number of asymptomatics was determined by counting antibodies for CV19 from serology tests. People who are asymptomatic are not going to the doctor or getting tested at drive thru generally, so their count has to be estimated.

There is not a doctor on the planet who thinks there can be or will be 11 million deaths from CV19 in the USA. The mortality rate is much lower than 4%.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/co...9Dp?li=BBnb7Kz
adav8s28 is offline   Quote
Old 07-01-2020, 05:03 AM   #34
adav8s28
Valued Poster
 
adav8s28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 4, 2011
Location: sacremento
Posts: 3,885
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aoi View Post
I mean, the chances of survival are over 99 percent,
A mortality rate that is calculated by including the number of asymptomatics is right at 1%. So, your survival rate statement of 99% is pretty accurate. The thing is with a Mortality rate of 1% for CV19 means that in the USA with a population around 330 million people, 3 million people would die if 300 million people got infected. Until a vaccine that works can be developed if social distance concepts are not practiced, 300 million people could become infected.
adav8s28 is offline   Quote
Old 07-01-2020, 07:03 PM   #35
pathfinder420
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 7, 2013
Location: Mid Cities
Posts: 596
Encounters: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by adav8s28 View Post
A mortality rate that is calculated by including the number of asymptomatics is right at 1%. So, your survival rate statement of 99% is pretty accurate. The thing is with a Mortality rate of 1% for CV19 means that in the USA with a population around 330 million people, 3 million people would die if 300 million people got infected. Until a vaccine that works can be developed if social distance concepts are not practiced, 300 million people could become infected.

For perspective, 3M is about the population of Dallas County.
pathfinder420 is online now   Quote
Old 07-02-2020, 02:15 PM   #36
texassapper
Valued Poster
 
texassapper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 19, 2017
Location: Dallas
Posts: 5,705
Encounters: 39
Default

JFC. This is why the liberals wanted to control the schools, so nobody could figure out how to do the math.

Let's just use the info from Johns Hopkins and LA county.

?????? unconfirmed CCPCOVID infections (completely estimated)
105665 confirmed CCPCOVID infections
3405 confirmed CCPCOVID deaths.


we know that the 105,665 confirmed infections represent a small fraction of the true UNTESTED infections. A swedish study confirmed that our tested infection rate is about 6.6% of the total number of infections. Thus in LA County the true infected number is likely ~ 1.6 million people (about 10% of the total population)

That means the true fatality rate is ~ 3405/1.6 Million = .21%

That's twice as fatal as Flu and would result in ~700,000 fatalities across the entire US.

The CDC updated their fatality rate to be below .3%

And let's just talk about the age split.... The CDC also indicates that 80% of all CCPCOVID deaths are from people age 60 and up. Which means that only about 140K <65 are going to die from CCPCOVID.

Sure CCPCOVID kills more people than the flu... But it's not worth the stupidity of closing everything down.
texassapper is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved