Looks like it’s Creepy Joe!!!!!

[bambino]

Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

The question was whether or not Obama urged Buttigieg to drop out of the race. He did not. Once out, Obama then advised Pete to use the leverage he had. It was quite obvious that the political leanings of both Buttigieg and Bloomberg aligned with Biden rather than Sanders.

What would be surprising is if Warren drops out and does not support Sanders.

Can you prove Obama didn’t discuss dropping out with Buttplug? Do think either would admit that they did?

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by friendly fred

Fair enough but even if there was a coordinated effort and a QUID PRO QUO - these things happen all the time in politics and don't seem illegal to me.

Why should they deny the obvious? I think proof is possible that it was explained to them how much better their future would be if they got out of the race to help Biden and most of all it was likely sold to them that it would help beat Trump.

It might.

The reason they are denying it is because they don't want to piss off the Bernie bros by making it seem like he was cheated or connived out of the nomination again. That would suppress the dim-retard turnout in November and benefit trump.

[nevergaveitathought]

Originally Posted by lustylad

The reason they are denying it is because they don't want to piss off the Bernie bros by making it seem like he was cheated or connived out of the nomination again. That would suppress the dim-retard turnout in November and benefit trump.

exactamundo

[Chung Tran]

from my POV, there is false excitement about Biden winning all those South and Eastern States, but Trump beats Biden in those same States, so.. why the excitement?

[lustylad]

I'm not excited. I'm bored. Sleepy Joe puts everyone to sleep.

Zzzzzz....

Wake me up when Hunter knocks up another stripper....

[bambino]

Originally Posted by lustylad

I'm not excited. I'm bored. Sleepy Joe puts everyone to sleep.

Zzzzzz....

Wake me up when Hunter knocks up another stripper....

The reason why Biden won those states is because he didn’t campaign there. When people see and listen to him in person, it’s over.

[friendly fred]

Originally Posted by bambino

The reason why Biden won those states is because he didn’t campaign there. When people see and listen to him in person, it’s over.

Good point!

As for Vice President Biden:

Senility, which is now more commonly referred to as dementia, is characterized by a decrease in cognitive abilities or mental decline. This may include the person's inability to concentrate, to recall information, and to properly judge a situation.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by bambino

The reason why Biden won those states is because he didn’t campaign there. When people see and listen to him in person, it’s over.

like when he debates Trump?


BAHHAHAAAAA

[nevergaveitathought]

Originally Posted by friendly fred

Good point!

As for Vice President Biden:

Senility, which is now more commonly referred to as dementia, is characterized by a decrease in cognitive abilities or mental decline. This may include the person's inability to concentrate, to recall information, and to properly judge a situation.

biden is more at risk now than ever before

that is if there are more debates scheduled

in the past, with a full complement of dim candidates taking up debate time and space, biden didn't have to be on top of everything, he could fade out and rest and only rouse himself every now and again

now if there is a future debate with only he and bernie going at it..well you get the picture

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

biden is more at risk now than ever before

that is if there are more debates scheduled

in the past, with a full complement of dim candidates taking up debate time and space, biden didn't have to be on top of everything, he could fade out and rest and only rouse himself every now and again

now if there is a future debate with only he and bernie going at it..well you get the picture

interesting point. will they have a one on one debate (sorry Tulsi) with Bernie and Corn Pop? on the one hand they should, shouldn't they? on the other it risks making them both look like fools in front of voters, mostly Democrats as i expect most Republicans aren't interested in either one as a serious candidate.


more debates would be fair to undecided Democrats. no debates give Bernie an opportunity to claim he's being shut out in favor of Biden. and he wouldn't be wrong about that, would he?


right now it's a dead heat, Biden at 603 and Bernie at 538. anyone's game. that could change a lot of course. i expect Biden to be the more viable candidate to most Democrats. but he needs 1991 to avoid a contested convention. if Bernie can keep him from getting that it's a problem. but does Bernie really think those super-delegates are going to side with him?

[Unique_Carpenter]

Joe and Bernie sitting in a tree....

[WTF]

Originally Posted by friendly fred

Good point!

As for Vice President Biden:

Senility, which is now more commonly referred to as dementia, is characterized by a decrease in cognitive abilities or mental decline. This may include the person's inability to concentrate, to recall information, and to properly judge a situation.

That could be ascribed to all three candidates!

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by friendly fred

As for Vice President Biden:

Senility, which is now more commonly referred to as dementia, is characterized by a decrease in cognitive abilities or mental decline. This may include the person's inability to concentrate, to recall information, and to properly judge a situation.

Originally Posted by WTF

That could be ascribed to all three candidates!

Says the poster with the senile penile!

[oeb11]

ftw thinks he/she is a physician now - just like j666!

[HoeHummer]

And yous, oebsy!