Farm Bailout so far has doubled the Auto Bailout of 2009

[eccielover]

Originally Posted by WTF

The auto loans were paid back....the farm subsidies are just welfare.

You may think it smart like government subsidies to say electric car buyers.

But they are welfare...not sure why you Trumpettes are so hypocritical about these things.


.

It's funny watching you try and back peddle your ridiculous posts titles that you get suckered into posting without thinking through.

So now you apparently agree that the auto bailout and the farm "subsidies"(not now a bailout) are indeed not an apples to apples comparison.

And to call the auto bailouts as "paid" back is rather laughable as well. Weren't they to the tune of about $85 Billion when doled out?

[eccieuser9500]

Originally Posted by WTF

An the Republican Party should quit trying to protect dynastic wealth and promote policies that produce more income equality.

The Gini coefficient is at levels last seen before the Great Depression.

We have another one of those and it will be FDR II.

[winn dixie]

Originally Posted by WTF

An the Republican Party should quit trying to protect dynastic wealth and promote policies that produce more income equality.

The Gini coefficient is at levels last seen before the Great Depression.

We have another one of those and it will be FDR II.

Since you support wealth redistribution why dont you donate your finances to this cause!
Butt, you never put your money where your mouth is!!

typical lib, always someone elses money

[WTF]

Originally Posted by eccielover

It's funny watching you try and back peddle your ridiculous posts titles that you get suckered into posting without thinking through.

So now you apparently agree that the auto bailout and the farm "subsidies"(not now a bailout) are indeed not an apples to apples comparison.

And to call the auto bailouts as "paid" back is rather laughable as well. Weren't they to the tune of about $85 Billion when doled out?

The euro and bank bailout was paid back in full with a profit....though as the article points out at a huge nutcase cost as it brought us you fucking Tea Party fruitcakes who are so fucking stupid you are now defending farm welfare!

https://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/20/b...rom%20%251%24s

[WTF]

Originally Posted by winn dixie

Since you support wealth redistribution why dont you donate your finances to this cause!
Butt, you never put your money where your mouth is!!

typical lib, always someone elses money

Every God damn tax is wealth redistribution you ignorant reyrey sounding political wannabe.

I have Luke on speed dial.

[winn dixie]

Originally Posted by WTF

Every God damn tax is wealth redistribution you ignorant reyrey sounding political wannabe.

I have Luke on speed dial.

Every tax is wealth redistribution? You really are as clueless as your posts!

Heres your sign.. So you just admitted you like and want more taxes!! and promote policies that produce more income equality.
Your own words in commie red you fucking commie! Major gotcha moment

[eccieuser9500]

How the Cool Kids of the Left Turned on Elizabeth Warren

As the 2020 campaign has unfolded, Warren has, if anything, tacked toward Bernie, embracing “Medicare for All” and free college, and making a wealth tax the centerpiece of her platform. Still,in the pages of Jacobin, Warren has gone from seeming like a close second to Sanders to being a member of the neoliberal opposition, perhaps made even worse by her desire to claim the mantle of the party’s left.

By RUAIRÍ ARRIETA-KENNA

https://www.politico.com/news/magazi...st-left-072693

[Tiny]

Originally Posted by WTF

An the Republican Party should quit trying to protect dynastic wealth and promote policies that produce more income equality.

The Gini coefficient is at levels last seen before the Great Depression.

We have another one of those and it will be FDR II.

Is the goal to help people at the bottom of the ladder so they become more prosperous? Or to make everyone poorer, especially the wealthy? Warren's and Sanders' policies would accomplish the latter.

According to the OECD, the USA has the most progressive tax system among developed countries.

Is there good data for the Gini coefficient going back to before the Great Depression? I'm not sure. In any event, if you adjust for taxes and transfers, the Gini coefficient now would be significantly lower. You're probably looking at data that use before tax income, and don't account for progressive taxation, social security, welfare, Medicare and Medicaid, the earned income tax credit, etc.

https://www.cato.org/publications/po...redistribution

[eccieuser9500]

Originally Posted by Tiny

Is the goal to help people at the bottom of the ladder so they become more prosperous? Or to make everyone poorer, especially the wealthy? Warren's and Sanders' policies would accomplish the latter.

According to the OECD, the USA has the most progressive tax system among developed countries.

Is there good data for the Gini coefficient going back to before the Great Depression? I'm not sure. In any event, if you adjust for taxes and transfers, the Gini coefficient now would be significantly lower. You're probably looking at data that use before tax income, and don't account for progressive taxation, social security, welfare, Medicare and Medicaid, the earned income tax credit, etc.

https://www.cato.org/publications/po...redistribution

I have to dig here. How do you turn the wealthy "poor"? Do you mean "less wealthy"?

[oeb11]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

How the Cool Kids of the Left Turned on Elizabeth Warren

By RUAIRÍ ARRIETA-KENNA

https://www.politico.com/news/magazi...st-left-072693

‘If You Are Not a Liberal When You Are Young, You Have No Heart, and If You Are Not a Conservative When Old, You Have No Brain’

[eccieuser9500]

Originally Posted by oeb11

‘If You Are Not a Liberal When You Are Young, You Have No Heart, and If You Are Not a Conservative When Old, You Have No Brain’

Originally Posted by oeb11

AWWWW - Poor DPST's complaining about their own lack of "Diversity"
They face a POTUS they are Impeaching - what is to worry????
Not enough candidates of color - and of course - the DPSY's aren't RACIST about their platform. Sure looks like they don't like their white candidates.

Of course - Warren is 1/1024 "Indian" - although he tests are South American DNA - she can put on a sombrero and spout - Ai, ai , ai , ai!!!
Poor Racist DPST's - stuck with old , senile, angry white folks as the "White Meat Alternative " to Trump!


LOL

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

How the Cool Kids of the Left Turned on Elizabeth Warren

By RUAIRÍ ARRIETA-KENNA

https://www.politico.com/news/magazi...st-left-072693

when Kool kids grow up they become conservatives.


BAHHAHHAHAAAA

[Tiny]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

I have to dig here. How do you turn the wealthy "poor"? Do you mean "less wealthy"?

Yes. "Make everyone poorer" in this context means "make everyone worse off."

[Tiny]

Originally Posted by oeb11

‘If You Are Not a Liberal When You Are Young, You Have No Heart, and If You Are Not a Conservative When Old, You Have No Brain’

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

when Kool kids grow up they become conservatives.
BAHHAHHAHAAAA

I'm not sure about the Millenials. They're a different breed, and more of them will be voting than baby boomers before long.

[eccielover]

Originally Posted by WTF

The euro and bank bailout was paid back in full with a profit....though as the article points out at a huge nutcase cost as it brought us you fucking Tea Party fruitcakes who are so fucking stupid you are now defending farm welfare!

https://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/20/b...rom%20%251%24s

First off, where did I defend farm welfare anywhere.

I'm simply pointing out your ridiculous OP comparison of the Farm "bailout" so far being double the Auto Bailout.

And now you post something showing a profit on the original bank and auto bailout a full six years after it took place.

You really do get caught up in the rhetoric you read without thinking it through don't you.