loud child in restraunt

[timmystool]

Originally Posted by JRLawrence

Timmy,

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...ds/1983864001/

Let's look beyound this discussion of disruption of your day, and personal desires. Go back to the referenced web site and read the item again: then read your comments and note the items that do not correspond to the referenced web site.

The conclusion: you may read individual words, but you do not understand nor comprehend what you are reading. Reading comprehention is used to be an important part of grade school and high school testing: read a paragraph, put it aside and now tell us what was said.

You don't seem able to do that. Reading comprehention is obtained prior to logical thinking: you lack that too.

It is time to block your comments due to a lack of reading comprehention.

eh?
prolix much?
lots of words, not saying anything
only reason you narrate your life is cause no one cares and you know it

[Unique_Carpenter]

Timmy,
Your missing the point entirely.

[timmystool]

Originally Posted by Unique_Carpenter

Timmy,
Your missing the point entirely.

then by alll means fill me in with whatever point is trying to be made


more insults? sheesh, its the internet, everyone throws rocks
points are hard to come by

[TailHooked]

Originally Posted by Fsn57

I imagine it would be a tough call for the management. If one party is complaining, odds are other patrons are also annoyed, but are not complaining. One would have to be there to read the situation and understand the severity of the annoyance, the logistics of isolating the problem (moving may not be an option given space, location of open tables, etc.), affected patrons, etc. If it made national news, I'm guessing its more than your typical crying baby that we've all experienced. Since I wasn't there, I would reserve judgement and not condemn the manager for his actions.

I agree with you on this FSN57. It made the news because the child has special needs. I know it is tough to have a special needs child. It is even tougher to find someone to babysit. Now she said he acted like he always does. So if it got to the point of disturbing the other patrons, an action needed to be taken. Maybe the complainer always complains. Who knows for sure. Common courtesy is what really is the point. Just because Outbacks doesn't wreak of money, shouldn't the other diners be given the common courtesy of eating in peace UC? I would think yes. With some teaching, she would be able to be out in public all the time. Since Outback never responded as to what their policy is, maybe the manager was following it. Maybe he could have done a better job too. What fills a eating establishments register is happy customers, who repeat. Good food, good service and a good environment. Once you lose one, you start losing customers. I can see Timmy's point that management tried to keep the others happy, at the expense of one group. I don't believe there was any discrimination. If it was the complainer who was causing trouble, I am sure he would have been asked to leave just as fast.

[JRLawrence]

Originally Posted by timmystool

eh?
prolix much?
lots of words, not saying anything
only reason you narrate your life is cause no one cares and you know it

READ IT AGAIN, SLOWLY. THEN READ IT AGAIN, SLOWLY!

There are ways to say things, that need to be said, without being insulting.

Now, understand that most of the people who have answered are trying to politely help you understant the importance of helping others: both the family with the child with special needs, and the other people present.

There is not an easy answer. There is a need for trying for understanding instead of acting st... and ig....t.




Got it now?

[Guest083119]

There is no constitutional right to eat without yammering kids. It's not a safety hazard either like kids running around. It's an inconvenience and without a posted policy about a certain level of noise, I can assure you most places don't have policies.

People have special needs kids, hard of hearing parents, brothers with tourette's and those people deserve to go out as families. It's called compassion and understanding. A little inconvenience. It's NOT the same as going to an R rated movie with crying kids. The rule in a theater is SILENCE IS GOLDEN and it is applied evenly.

At Capital Grille, when people come in with young children, they have a special place to put them on the other side of the bar because that is not a child friendly place. That is a reasonable accommodation.

Now, I'm also willing to concede that this family should perhaps call ahead and explain the situation and ask for a table in the back by the kitchen and a helpful server. That is courtesy as well.

[Unique_Carpenter]

B Three is bringing up a key part of my point, the Mgr should have made accommodation somehow.

And, I'll add at the risk of getting a bit close to my RW, public places are required by Federal Law to accommodate disabled folks.

And, sorry B Three, but all the chains do have full blown policies on that issue.

[Billie Maddison]

It’s too bad we are a point in time when we always have to blame someone. Will we ever get to the time when people in the restaurant will ask if they can help? “I noticed your little one is restless, what can I do to help? I would be glad to read, play, make faces, anything to help so YOU ( not me) so YOU (not me) can enjoy your meal.

[Unique_Carpenter]

Billie,
Exactly

[mojoworkin]

Timmy seems all pissed off about something that didn't even happen to him. It appears he has some anger/rage issues. He should consider seeking therapy. I hope the guy doesn't have children. I also hope he doesn't dine out often. Ladies, beware of this nut job.

[BigDeal]

His former handle is Bigcockpussylicker (bcpl)
That should answer your question.
Why is this even a topic on a escort board?
Shouldnt this be discussed with your therapist?

[timmystool]

Originally Posted by Unique_Carpenter

B Three is bringing up a key part of my point, the Mgr should have made accommodation somehow.

And, I'll add at the risk of getting a bit close to my RW, public places are required by Federal Law to accommodate disabled folks. .

how do you accomadate a loud child?
lemme know, Im curious


then I'll file a ADA discrimination suit cause the restraunt didnt accomade a loud child


so the child is allowed to park in Handicapped Parking, right?

[timmystool]

Originally Posted by mojoworkin

Timmy seems all pissed off about something that didn't even happen to him. It appears he has some anger/rage issues. He should consider seeking therapy.

pissed off? on the internet? I dont even get pissed off in real life..


too much trouble to be bothered with that, I do like to see how people see things, unlike RW, I dont see how people actually DO things, just what they say
example, I know a lady, 50s, who likes to drive to get the cheapest gas, even if it's a few miles away
her tank is less than 20 gallons and I was confused this saved her oney
if she drove 2 miles to till her tank to save 2 cents off gas,, then that's maybe 40c
the IRS allows a deduction of 58/mile
so shes not saving anymore to drive 4 miles out of her way
I explained this to her and she looked at me and said, I see the savings in my wallet tho.


Ok!!?


I dont understand how or if she thinks


did i get mad at her?

why would i get mad?
that is a real world interaction, this is the internet!

[timmystool]

Originally Posted by Billie Maddison

It’s too bad we are a point in time when we always have to blame someone. Will we ever get to the time when people in the restaurant will ask if they can help? “I noticed your little one is restless, what can I do to help? I would be glad to read, play, make faces, anything to help so YOU ( not me) so YOU (not me) can enjoy your meal.

I thought about this and that woulda been great, if someone who is on the clock, would have stopped doing their job and tried to help get the kid quiet.
musta been the first time the mom/dad? learned their child was out of control
and later would have complained about the stranger intruding on them to get their child quiet


or however they would have spun it

[timmystool]

Originally Posted by B Three

There is no constitutional right to eat without yammering kids. It's not a safety hazard either like kids running around. It's an inconvenience and without a posted policy about a certain level of noise, I can assure you most places don't have policies.


Now, I'm also willing to concede that this family should perhaps call ahead and explain the situation and ask for a table in the back by the kitchen and a helpful server. That is courtesy as well.

so i can go to a restaurant with an air horn?

yes, the parent(s) should have taken responsibly, they have a bunch of customers to defend and a business to run, they arent special Ed staffed


calling ahead wouold have been ideal,
the restraunt is not to blame, the blame is solely on the parents