What's this bullshit about "Won't use stolen intelligence?"

[gnadfly]

There's some chatter about Trump saying his campaign may use "stolen intelligence" while several Democratic candidates are swearing not to use "stolen intelligence."

Bullshit. They'll all use "intelligence" stolen or not. The media will use it whether it's "stolen" or "real intelligence" or "fake intelligence." After the media or another campaign uses it it then its "stolen intelligence" status is moot and they'll all use it.

This is all political hypocrisy that some in the media are trying to pass off as legitimate virtue signalling.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/every-...no-stolen-data

[Lantern2814]

Technically speaking, isn't all intelligence "stolen"? I mean, someone is getting information (be it about a person, country, or whatever) and passing it along to whoever they work for without the knowledge (or permission) of the party they're spying on. Just more Dim nonsense.

[lustylad]

How many dimotard candidates are pledging they won't take debate questions in advance?

I'm soooooo disappointed that hildebeest didn't pick up the phone and call the FBI on Donna Brazile!

[lustylad]

If Wikileaks published trumpy's stolen tax returns tomorrow, does anyone believe the dim-retards would all bite their lips and say "no comment"?

BAAHAHAHAHA!!

[oeb11]

LL-Good Point!

[bambino]

Originally Posted by lustylad

If Wikileaks published trumpy's stolen tax returns tomorrow, does anyone believe the dim-retards would all bite their lips and say "no comment"?

BAAHAHAHAHA!!

Rachel Madcow already did it. Didn’t work out so well.

BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[rexdutchman]

Just more media scare and deceive , It should be Un-intelligence

[TheDaliLama]

Stolen evidence is fine as long has you weren’t the one who stole it.

[Austin Ellen]

They are the biggest hypocrite's ever,ever,ever. Jeeze, the Dems want to pretend they are above it all. You know those little fuckers would use any and all stolen intelligence if they got their hands on it. And then lie about it. Like Trump said - America's hands are not that clean.

Originally Posted by gnadfly

There's some chatter about Trump saying his campaign may use "stolen intelligence" while several Democratic candidates are swearing not to use "stolen intelligence."

Bullshit. They'll all use "intelligence" stolen or not. The media will use it whether it's "stolen" or "real intelligence" or "fake intelligence." After the media or another campaign uses it it then its "stolen intelligence" status is moot and they'll all use it.

This is all political hypocrisy that some in the media are trying to pass off as legitimate virtue signalling.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/every-...no-stolen-data

[gnadfly]

The New York Times supposedly has the last 10 years of Donald Trumps tax returns and have summarized them and published them. No outrage from the media other than they didn't get them yet.

This is an example of "stolen intelligence". President Kong should have the FBI raid the NYT offices and thoroughly search their premises and computer for the stolen federal documents-seizing everything suspicious.

[dilbert firestorm]

who is likely to have access to trumps's tax transcripts?


I think Trump is behind this as calculated effort to blow up the media.

[the_real_Barleycorn]

Who's to blame if offer some kind of bribe...and he takes it?

[rexdutchman]

Yeah butt the media pulled their own pin ,,,

[gnadfly]

So it was described as Trumps "tax returns." Then it was described as Trumps "tax documents". Now it's being described as Trumps "Tax Transcripts."

WTF is a "Tax transcript?"

President Kong should have the FBI raid the offices of the NYT to find out what they are talking about.

[gnadfly]

I see the MSM websites are pulling the "NYT's Trump Tax Return" story.