Quote:
	
	
		
			
				
					Originally Posted by  dilbert firestorm
					 
				 
				how does one renounce a citizenship when she was never a citizen to begin with? 
			
		 | 
	
	
 
turns out there are serious questions about her citizenship. a deeper dive into that VOX article tells an interesting and complicated story ..
the father claims he "resigned" before the woman was born, the UN didn't recognize it until afterward, meaning she was never a citizen. they had the opportunity to apply for a green card for her but didn't. as a diplomat, it figures this guy would know the situation. ignorance isn't gonna fly he had his own Consulate for advice or .. call a lawyer?? 
i think he knew perfectly well the daughter would be born while he was still a diplomat and he tried to early resign to get around that. the UN sees it differently and so does the US. it was under Obama after all that did not renew the passport after ten years and she took no action to contest it, and the timeline says she had burned it by then. 
so that's the case she is not a US citizen so she's fucked. screw her. Case Over. 
now the case if she is .. and why it still doesn't matter. 
let's say legally the father wins and his resignation is enough to establish the daughter as a citizen. then as Jackie pointed out, by voluntarily joining ISIS a known foreign militia then she voids her citizenship. and by not contesting a new passport she did get due process and willfully ignored it. 
citizenship revoked! 
 
              The fight over whether ISIS recruit Hoda Muthana is a US citizen, explained
         
   Muthana was born in the US. She got a US passport. But the Trump administration isn’t taking her back.
                 By                              
Dara Linddara@vox.com                                             Feb 22, 2019,  3:21pm EST
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/63097246/GettyImages_946569106.0.jpg)
                                               Hoda Muthana burned her US passport when she joined  ISIS, in a similar gesture of protest to the burning of the US flag  here. Now, the Trump administration is arguing she never should have  been issued a passport — and isn’t an American citizen at all.                       Ahmad Al-Rubaye/AFP/Getty Images                               Hoda Muthana was born in the US. In 2014, as a  20-year-old student at the University of Alabama-Birmingham, she told  her parents she was going on a field trip to Atlanta; instead, she  withdrew from school, used the reimbursed tuition to buy a plane ticket,  flew to Turkey, made her way to Syria, and joined ISIS.
 Now she wants to come home. But the US doesn’t want to take her back — and it claims it doesn’t have to. 
 While in Syria, Muthana used her social media accounts to call for the murder of Americans. 
 “Go on drive-bys and spill all of their blood, or rent a  big truck and drive all over them. Veterans, Patriot, Memorial etc Day  parades..go on drive by’s + spill all of their blood or rent a big truck  n drive all over them. Kill them,” Muthana tweeted from her  now-suspended Twitter account, according to 
a 2015 profile of her by BuzzFeed News. 
 But that was then. Now, with ISIS in shreds, she 
says she’s prepared to face trial in the United States for her actions.
 Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, however, 
has declared  that Muthana was never actually a US citizen — and that, therefore,  there’s no legal obligation for the US to take her back, even if it’s to  put her on trial. (On Wednesday, after Pompeo’s statement, President  Donald Trump tweeted that he had 
“instructed” Pompeo not to let Muthana back into the US.)
 Muthana’s father, Ahmed Ali Muthana, is 
suing to allow her to come home,  claiming that both she and her 18-month-old son are in fact US citizens  and that they are being deprived of their constitutional rights.
The question of whether Muthana actually is a citizen or  not turns out to be fairly complicated, and the US government’s position  has changed over time. 
 At issue is whether she was “subject to the jurisdiction  of the United States” at birth, a status that her father claims she  holds and that the federal government, starting in 2016, has claimed she  does not.
 
Whether Hoda Muthana is a citizen or not depends on whether her father was still a diplomat when she was born
 Hoda Muthana told 
NBC News  that her citizenship has never been questioned before, and that “[w]hen  I tried filing for a passport it was very easy. It came in 10 days.” 
 But that’s not true. 
 Muthana was issued a passport as a US citizen, that’s  true. But the government challenged her citizenship before giving her a  passport. And in 2016, after she’d burned her passport upon joining 
ISIS  — “Bonfire soon, no need for these anymore, alhamdulliah [thanks be to  God],” she tweeted, with a photo of her and several other women’s  Western passports — the Obama administration officially declared the  passport and her citizenship had never been valid to begin with.
 The 14th Amendment to the US Constitution provides 
birthright citizenship  to everyone born on US soil and “subject to the jurisdiction of” the  United States. While there’s an argument (somewhat on the fringe) that  “jurisdiction” doesn’t apply to unauthorized immigrants living in the  US, everyone agrees that it doesn’t apply to babies born to foreign  diplomats. 
 Diplomatic immunity exempts the diplomat — and,  generally, his or her family — from US jurisdiction, the argument goes,  so children born in the US to foreign diplomats are citizens of their  parents’ home countries, not US citizens.
Hoda Muthana’s father, Ahmed Ali Muthana, came to the US  from Yemen in 1990 to serve as a diplomat representing his home country  at the United Nations, whose headquarters are located in New York City. 
 However, he lost that job — and thus his diplomatic  immunity — as the result of the Yemeni civil war in the mid-1990s. The  question is exactly whenhe lost his diplomatic privileges — and whether that happened before Hoda was born, on October 28, 1994, or after.
 The US government has told Ahmed Ali Muthana (according  to his lawsuit) that its records show he held diplomatic status until  February 6, 1995 — that is, until after Hoda’s birth — and therefore  that Hoda was born while he was still a diplomat and thus is not a US  citizen, but a Yemeni one. 
 Ahmed Ali Muthana, on the other hand, claims in a lawsuit  that he surrendered his diplomatic identity card on June 2, 1994 —  months before his daughter was born. 
Legal experts I spoke to said that that wouldn’t  necessarily mean he officially lost his diplomatic status on that date,  though. Steve Vladeck, a law professor at the University of Texas at  Austin, said that under US law, ex-diplomats who are still in the  country enjoy some “residual immunity” while they pack their bags and  prepare to head back home.
 But the Muthanas weren’t just wrapping up their affairs  before returning to Yemen; they were settling in the country for good.  Hoda Muthana’s mother had already applied for a green card in early  1994, based on herfather’s US citizenship. And both of Hoda’s parents got green cards after she was born.
 Hoda could have gotten one as a dependent of her parents,  but since the family thought she was a US citizen by birth, they didn’t  apply for one.
 The discrepancy first came up in 2004 (per the lawsuit),  when Ahmed Ali Muthana applied for a passport for Hoda. When the  government said its records showed he was a diplomat when Hoda was born,  Muthana obtained a letter from the US Mission to the UN declaring that  their records showed he was officially “noticed” as a diplomat through  September 1, 1994. 
  Hoda’s passport was subsequently granted, and renewed 10 years later — right before she left the country to join ISIS.
  
The Obama administration revoked Muthana’s passport, but the Trump administration’s declarations raise more questions
 In January 2016, the US government sent the Muthana household a letter addressed to Hoda 
officially revoking her US passport.  The letter claimed that the passport had been issued in error, because  there was “no evidence” that she was actually a US citizen by birth. The  government asserted that, contrary to the testimony provided in 2004,  the US Mission to the UN’s records showed that Muthana’s father didn’t  lose diplomatic status until months after Hoda was born.
 In  theory, Hoda had the right to a hearing to challenge the passport  revocation, but she didn’t ask for one; after all, she was encamped with  ISIS by that point.
 Revoking someone’s passport isn’t the same as revoking  their citizenship. But the implication of the Obama administration’s  revocation of her passport was that she had never been a citizen at all.  (The administration only explicitly said that she “did not acquire US  citizenship at birth,” but because the Muthanas thought she had been  born a citizen, she didn’t get naturalized when her parents did.) 
The Trump administration has simply been forced to  address the question publicly because Muthana now seeks to return to the  US and face trial here. And they’ve done so in their typically blunt  way, issuing a press statement that Muthana was never a citizen and  therefore that it didn’t have to take her back.
 Some legal experts — including Vladeck — believe that the  government was obligated to follow a specific process before  determining Muthana was not a citizen, and it’s not clear whether either  the Obama or Trump administrations followed that process. 
 But it’s also not clear whether that process necessarily  applies to the revocation of a passport on the grounds that the passport  was issued in error.
 If Muthana is a citizen — even though her passport was  revoked — it’s “generally understood” that she’d be allowed to return to  the US, Vladeck said. But if she’s not a citizen, there’s very little  hope for her to return; attorney Gabriel Malor told Vox that if she  tried to apply for some other form of immigration status at this point,  she’d be barred because of her history with a terrorist group.
 Crucially, because Muthana’s 18-month-old son was born  outside the US and the father was a Tunisian ISIS fighter, the question  of whether Muthana is a US citizen determines her son’s citizenship,  too.
 Muthana’s father’s lawsuit is something of a desperate  move. The US government generally doesn’t allow passport decisions to be  subject to judicial review, so it’s not clear that a judge will ever  force the Trump administration to explain how it decided Muthana was not  a citizen — much less overrule them. In the meantime, Muthana is stuck  in Syria.