Trump - The nepotism begins

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

He is for unlimited surveillance and indefinite detention.

I'm sure he's not worried about you. You are still posting.

But I'd be careful calling him an "idiot"!

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

....the dipshit he appointed. I live in Pompeo's district. He's a statist idiot.

Did you vote a straight Libertarian ticket?

[CuteOldGuy]

No, I did not. But I did vote Libertarian for Congress. And Pompeo already knows I think he's an idiot. I told him that in person. More gently, of course, but he got my point.

[Old-T]

If I were you I would be quite concerned about his first three nominees. They all are all of a similar cloath. If they have their way you will be reminded a lot of Joe McCarthy.

[CuteOldGuy]

I'm mainly concerned with who he will appoint to the Court. I doubt he will name anyone to his Cabinet that will make me wish I voted for Hillary. That would not be possible. I may not like them, but I knew I wouldn't like everything when I voted for him.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

He is for unlimited surveillance and indefinite detention. I can see why you support him. Besides, I have spoken to him on several occasions. He's an idiot, and a danger to freedom. You should do your own research and quit relying on others for your opinions.

Show me a link where he supports "unlimited surveillance and indefinite detention".

When you spoke to Mike Pompeo, did you call him an idiot and a statist? You're such a charmer. I've met Michael Hayden. He is way more impressive and informed than you or anyone else on this forum.

Btw, I research topics much more thoroughly than you do. I do it for my own edification. Too bad your mind is always closed. You invariably dismiss the fruits of anyone else's research as government or MSM propaganda.

[CuteOldGuy]

Look it up. You don't trust my research anyway. And no, I did not use the word idiot. I was respectful, as I am in all my RL interactions. But the point was made, on those two very issues.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Look it up. You don't trust my research anyway...

There you go again with your predictable cop-out - look it up yourself.

I have no doubt Pompeo supports surveillance and detention of terrorists, as do all good Americans. It's sheer hyperbole on your part to say he supports unlimited surveillance or indefinite detention. You copped out because you know you can't find a single instance where he said that.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by Old-T

If I were you I would be quite concerned about his first three nominees. They all are all of a similar cloath. If they have their way you will be reminded a lot of Joe McCarthy.

Did you vote for Trump?

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Look it up. You don't trust my research anyway. And no, I did not use the word idiot. I was respectful, as I am in all my RL interactions. But the point was made, on those two very issues.

I'm sure he rushed right into therapy to change his character!

Right?

Didn't you call me an idiot in here at least a couple of times?

And this was your call ... "Mr. Genius"

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?...post1058742969

CuteOldGuy

"Trump will likely go down, and take the Republican Party with him. So, at least something good may come from this. Maybe a party with some anti-establishment balls will take its place. Trump didn't lose this election. The Establishment Republican Party lost it. The Party did not want any of their pre-selected candidates. Jeb Bush would have never been close. Cruz would cry when Hillary played dirty. Rubio is a kid. Christie could handle her, but just isn't much different. Nobody but Trump had a chance to win. And now he doesn't. So, he is doing the next best thing. He is destroying the Establishment, Paul Ryan, Lindsey Graham, John McCain, Jeb Bush Republican Party. Thank you, Donald.

And remember, as FDR said, "Presidents aren't elected, they are selected." "

[CuteOldGuy]

Yes. I voted for Trump. Over the course of the campaign, my opinion changed. First, Gary Johnson was a different candidate than last time. I don't know what the hell he was thinking. Then Trump started telling the unfiltered and unvarnished truth about Hillary. I really respected that. I have mentioned this on here a few times if you would pay attention. After reviewing the situation as it unfolded, I decided that Trump was the most acceptable alternative to Hillary. My primary driving force was Never Hillary. Nearly every Establishment Republican opposed Trump. He was doing something right. I'm still surprised as hell that he won. That does kind of bother me. But I'm going to give him a chance. He won't be as bad as Hillary certainly would have been.

Trump was the only apparent anti-establishment candidate with a chance, however small, to win. I like his stand on borders, SCOTUS nominees, and normalizing relations with Russia. Other areas, I'm not so fond of. Pompeo being one of them. But he's no worse than anyone Hillary would have appointed, so that's a wash.


And you are not always an idiot. But sometimes you are. I just think you should know.

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by TryWeakly

No words needed.

THE FOLLOWING IS COURTESY OF TRYWEAKLY, LLIARMAN AND ESPECIALLY BLEEDING WHITE GIRL SLOBBRIN

I’m sure everybody else is ready for a new outbreak of Bumpghazi!

It’s been almost two weeks.

This ghost town was showing a little life, despite having its ranks severely diminished because LLiarman and SLOBBRIN’s Bumpghazi.


Thanks for reminding us all why you’re here.

[gnadfly]

No, it is courtesy of you, Assup. Dipshit Emeritus. Obamacare addict.

[Yssup Rider]

Not on Obamacare, turdfly.

How much do White Girls Bleed?

Are you Deplorable or Despicable?

This shit is about to break loose again.