Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

LexusLover · 07-09-2017, 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lustylad

FTFY, jackass.

He apparently thinks it's acceptable for NK to nuke the U.S.

That would destroy all of HillariousNoMore's emails and the fraudulent voter registration apps. And he wouldn't have to complete those punch lists on those crappy houses he builds.

And finally he spuriously claim that all the "collusion" evidence was burned up in the blast, which was PROOF that Trump was actually colluding with the NK's to get rid of the evidence against him!!!

Of course there would be no "Eccie" so we'd never know!

lustylad · 07-09-2017, 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WTF

So Trump is cherry picking what he believes from the intel community?

Who's cherry picking? So you're admitting you made up the story about Trump not believing the intel on NK... This is why you have no cred.

You're a flip-flopping fake news faggot!

Rey Lengua · 07-09-2017, 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lustylad

Who's cherry picking? So you're admitting you made up the story about Trump not believing the intel on NK... This is why you have no cred.

You're a flip-flopping fake news faggot!

He prolly flies his rainbow flag everyday and NEVER flies the U.S. flag now that shrilLIARy LOST ! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

LexusLover · 07-09-2017, 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rey Lengua

.... flies .....

Speaking of "flying" has the air activity picked up ...

..... around SA to the South/Southeast and Northeast?

bamscram · 07-09-2017, 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lustylad

Who's cherry picking? So you're admitting you made up the story about Trump not believing the intel on NK... This is why you have no cred.

You're a flip-flopping fake news faggot!

Did you miss his little speech where he jerked the rug from the intel community on WDS in Iraq lusty cunt? He said they lied .

LexusLover · 07-09-2017, 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bamscram

Did you miss his little speech where he jerked the rug from the intel community on WDS in Iraq lusty cunt? He said they lied .

Was that while he was campaigning?

I thought so.

And that "intel community" was during Clinton's administration.

That's 20 fucking years ago! You're not "kinda dumb"!

You're completely DUMB!

bamscram · 07-09-2017, 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Was that while he was campaigning?

I thought so.

And that "intel community" was during Clinton's administration.

That's 20 fucking years ago! You're not "kinda dumb"!

You're completely DUMB!

It was in Poland simple lexus.

http://dailycaller.com/2017/07/06/tr...iraq-had-wmds/

Old-T · 07-09-2017, 03:13 PM

A three page thread and almost nothing worth reading.

According to some here, Trump gets a free pass on anything he said as a candidate? That is dumb.

Trump is getting better about understanding that the IC actually might know more than a corporate CEO. But sadly he still selectively believes/uses intel reports--just as Obama and Bush-2 did. But of the three, he might be the best at actually accepting what is there (and what is not actually known).

Going to war with NK is the wrong thing. It is a losing proposition no matter what the outcome. And one might want to look back at the last time we did that. It is too close to China, and they cannot tolerate either US massed presence, nor the perception that we can operate with impunity in their backyard.

The cleanest options are (1) to convince China to handle the twerp (why they have tolerated a nut job who CAN deliver nukes within China's borders I will not really comprehend), or (2) a surgical assassination. Sometimes--as in this case--the NK population cannot do anything to control their mad dog, and in reality they are not to blame for the Kim family. No reason to make the population suffer for one genetically inbred sick bastard.

Of course the consequence of such a removal would be "interesting". Some country (SK???, China???) would have to step up and do what West Germany did after the fall of the wall. How that would play out in China's back yard is a big unknown.

LexusLover · 07-09-2017, 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bamscram

It was in Poland ...

So you think the Iraqi WMD's were in Poland during the Clinton Administration? And you call me "simple"?

LexusLover · 07-09-2017, 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old-T

The cleanest options are (1) to convince China to handle the twerp (why they have tolerated a nut job who CAN deliver nukes within China's borders I will not really comprehend), or (2) a surgical assassination. Sometimes--as in this case--the NK population cannot do anything to control their mad dog, and in reality they are not to blame for the Kim family. No reason to make the population suffer for one genetically inbred sick bastard.

I suspect that Plan C (or 3 using your pecking order) would be a neutralizing "shock and awe" strike against threats to South Korea, a crippling and disabling strike to prevent any launches of missiles with potential payloads, and a leveling of the facility in which the little turd is cowering. We have the assets and we've had the time to lock down locations and preload the surprises. The recent "fly by" was a probe and "ping" if you will.

There will be collateral damage (although I can't stand the term) in the form of NK civilian population and infrastructure damage, as well as a potential of the same, but not as extensive in SK if at all. The lesson from the past is slogging it out is not the correct approach.

Unfortunately the previous administrations didn't push the issue to the breaking point and end NK's efforts for ever. Their failure to create credibility in NK has led us to this point.

bamscram · 07-09-2017, 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LexusLover

So you think the Iraqi WMD's were in Poland during the Clinton Administration? And you call me "simple"?

Have one of your grandchildren read the link, and explain it yo you simple lexus.

Old-T · 07-09-2017, 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LexusLover

I suspect that Plan C (or 3 using your pecking order) would be a neutralizing "shock and awe" strike against threats to South Korea, a crippling and disabling strike to prevent any launches of missiles with potential payloads, and a leveling of the facility in which the little turd is cowering. We have the assets and we've had the time to lock down locations and preload the surprises. The recent "fly by" was a probe and "ping" if you will.

There will be collateral damage (although I can't stand the term) in the form of NK civilian population and infrastructure damage, as well as a potential of the same, but not as extensive in SK.

Unfortunately the previous administrations didn't push the issue to the breaking point and end NK's efforts for ever. Their failure to create credibility in NK has led us to this point.

It is easy to know where 10s or thousands of aim points are, but to be able to do anything about them in a very short amount of time is a totally different problem. The sortie rate for bombs large enough to effectively target those sites is not big enough.

The NK problem was not "pushed to issue" by Obama, but to be honest, it had been largely ignored for decades under both parties. The financial commitment to weapons/delivery platforms would be huge, and all the administrations since Carter--ALL of them--did not deem it a high priority place to spend DoD $$$s. Some talked a good game, but none bought the volume of relatively low-tech toys needed for a Korean fight. They either invested in stealth (Carter), nukes, SOF, etc.

LexusLover · 07-09-2017, 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old-T

It is easy to know where 10s or thousands of aim points are, but to be able to do anything about them in a very short amount of time is a totally different problem. The sortie rate for bombs large enough to effectively target those sites is not big enough.

Hide and watch.

LexusLover · 07-09-2017, 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bamscram

Have one of your grandchildren read the link, ....

... a link you posted for the proposition that the Clinton Administration didn't have "intelligence" confirmation that WMD's were in Iraq and Iraqis had a WMD development program?

Why would I want to look at it? Because you posted it?

That reason enough to ignore it!!!! That's pretty fucking simple!

You don't even need your grandkids ... Predator Bill lays it out!

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stori...s/clinton.html

"Earlier today, I ordered America's armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors." December 16, 1998.

lustylad · 07-09-2017, 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old-T

It is easy to know where 10s or thousands of aim points are, but to be able to do anything about them in a very short amount of time is a totally different problem. The sortie rate for bombs large enough to effectively target those sites is not big enough.

Actually, our satellite intel is still spotty but we're rushing to fix the problem... read this:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/06/w...-missiles.html