Quote:
Originally Posted by MT Pockets
Trying to stay on point, I am saying this... as a honest comparison... If Comey wanted to stay non-partisan he would not have added personal opinions and not said anything about the Weiner deal. And by his convictions to tell us about it he should have told us about the Russian?Trump deal as well.
|
You are NOT making an honest comparison.
From the NYT story (see my last post for link):
"To Mr. Comey’s allies, the two investigations were totally different. One was closed when he spoke about it. The other was continuing, highly classified and in its earliest stages. Much of the debate over Mr. Comey’s actions over the last seven months can be distilled into whether people make that same distinction."
As far as the "Weiner deal" is concerned:
When Comey testified before Congress last July, he specifically said if anything were to cause the FBI to reopen the Hillary Clinton investigation, he would notify them. He would have broken his very public promise if he had failed to notify Congress when the FBI discovered Anthony Weiner's laptop in late October.
What I find amusing is how the libtards keep blaming Comey for hildebeest's defeat, but you never hear them blame Carlos Danger! What's up with that?
