Kim Jong-un Says He Will Sink A US Carrier.......

[WTF]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

You don't give a shit about U.S. cities? You do watch MSNBC!

http://www.snopes.com/quotes/goering.asp

Hermann Goering had your dumbass in mind when he said how easy it is to get a nation to war...

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by WTF

Hermann Goering had your dumbass in mind when he said how easy it is to get a nation to war...

Neville Chamberlain had YOUR dumbass in mind when he demonstrated how easy it is for feckless appeasement toward thugs like Goering to get a nation into war.

Why do you quote thugs approvingly?

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Why do you quote thugs approvingly?

He looks up to them as roll models!

It didn't work back then, but he doesn't realize it!

"Consumption"!

[WTF]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Neville Chamberlain had YOUR dumbass in mind when he demonstrated how easy it is for feckless appeasement toward thugs like Goering to get a nation into war.

Why do you quote thugs approvingly?
]

Because this "thug" happens to hit the nail on the head.

NK....now you wanna go to war with NK...last month it was Syria.

Goering had your dumbass in mind too , i reckon.

Jesus...it is 2003 all over again!

Cut taxes on the wealthy and go to fucking war! Same playbook...oh and you fucker no longer care about the deficit. 2003 all over, yep.


.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by WTF

NK....now you wanna go to war with NK...last month it was Syria.

Jesus...it is 2003 all over again!

You are a simple-minded simpleton, so it doesn't surprise me that you draw a shallow and simplistic parallel to 2003.

I don't want to "go to war" in Syria, you dumbfuck. There already IS a war in Syria. I want the US to do what it takes to STOP a disastrous and destabilizing war that has been raging there for 6 years - all on odumbo's watch, stoked by his phony red lines and inaction.

And you can't pretend we won't find WMDs in Syria or North Korea. We've seen the sarin gas attacks. We've detected and recorded NK's underground nuclear tests. The threats are real and observable and verified.

Of course, you never met a threat you were willing to face up to. If you had been advising JKF during the Cuban missile crisis, we would all be calling each other comrade now!

Tell the truth, fagboy... you've been colluding with the Russians for decades!

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Tell the truth, fagboy... you've been colluding with the Russians for decades!

Well, thanks to his candidate for President, they own at least 1/2 the uranium in this country, and more than likely have the right of first refusal to the other half!

He reminds me of the "I'd rather be Red than dead!" crowd in the 60's.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by lustylad

You are a simple-minded simpleton, so it doesn't surprise me that you draw a shallow and simplistic parallel to 2003.

I don't want to "go to war" in Syria, you dumbfuck. There already IS a war in Syria. I want the US to do what it takes to STOP a disastrous and destabilizing war that has been raging there for 6 years - all on odumbo's watch, stoked by his phony red lines and inaction.

!

It has been prolonged by us giving munitions to the rebels.

The red line in the sand is overblown bs that emotional pussies rally around. He should never have said it...much like Trump saying Mexico was going to pay for a wall and he was withdrawing from NAFTA asap.

Originally Posted by lustylad

And you can't pretend we won't find WMDs in Syria or North Korea. We've seen the sarin gas attacks. We've detected and recorded NK's underground nuclear tests. The threats are real and observable and verified.

!

You'll find Nukes in NK you moron.

The reason every fucking nation wants them now more than ever is to keep other nations from dictating regime change. Like what happened in Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya....and is happening to the former Russian satellite states.

Originally Posted by lustylad

Of course, you never met a threat you were willing to face up to. If you had been advising JKF during the Cuban missile crisis, we would all be calling each other comrade now!

!

JFK gave up our missile bases in Turkey.

What is Trump willing to give up?

He is not invading NK.

What options does he have?

Will he make a deal much like Clinton did?

[WTF]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Well, thanks to his candidate for President, they own at least 1/2 the uranium in this country, and more than likely have the right of first refusal to the other half!

He reminds me of the "I'd rather be Red than dead!" crowd in the 60's.

You remind me of the chickenHawks of 2003...oh wait, you are a chickenHawk from 2003.

2017 version...






.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by WTF

The red line in the sand is overblown bs that emotional pussies rally around. He should never have said it.

I'll give you partial credit for being half right.

Originally Posted by WTF

What is Trump willing to give up?

That's your first question? Not what the fatboy in Pyongyang must do, but what are WE willing to give up? Whose side are you on? Oh wait, we already know that.

Originally Posted by WTF

Will he make a deal much like Clinton did?

You mean the 1994 "Agreed Framework"? That worked out so well! It brought us "peace in our time"... or as Slick Willy would say "peace in my two terms"!

[WTF]

Originally Posted by lustylad

I'll give you partial credit for being half right.

I'll give you 100% credit for being one of the dumbasses Goering was talking about.


.

[Munchmasterman]

Funny when a dumb ass can't even repeat the lie correctly.
It was 20% of capacity. And since the Russians don't have an export licence the uranium isn't going anywhere.
And since you couldn't get the percentage right, no reason to get the facts correct over who had veto power over the deal,
right dumbass?
I'll give you a hint. The person who could stop the deal didn't have Clinton for a last name.

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Well, thanks to his candidate for President, they own at least 1/2 the uranium in this country, and more than likely have the right of first refusal to the other half!

He reminds me of the "I'd rather be Red than dead!" crowd in the 60's.

Not doing too well today,
huh?

http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/...ry-clinton-ga/

You sure are a lazy motherfucker. That why they keep you out of sight at night.

Are you going to correct your misstatement? Or leave it wrong and cry to the mods?[COLOR="blue"[/COLOR]

[DSK]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

Funny when a dumb ass can't even repeat the lie correctly.
It was 20% of capacity. And since the Russians don't have an export licence the uranium isn't going anywhere.

Please explain how the lack of an export license stops the Russians from sending it anywhere they want??

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by DSK

Please explain how the lack of an export license stops the Russians from sending it anywhere they want??

He probably wasn't around during the grain embargo on the Soviets!

[andymarksman]

Originally Posted by DSK

Please explain how the lack of an export license stops the Russians from sending it anywhere they want??

U.S. laws strictly forbid the export of Uranium without a license issued by the NRC under any circumstance, which the Russian company (ARMZ) that controls its Canadian stake does not have and has not applied for.


http://law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/2160c

http://law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/2160d

BTW, the Russians for two decades had been shipping highly enriched Uranium from their decommissioned nuclear warheads to power roughly 50 per cent of all commercial nuclear power plants in the U.S., so please don't spew this "I am holier than thou" bullshit, it won't hold a fuck here.


http://eandt.theiet.org/content/arti...l-comes-to-end

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by andymarksman

U.S. laws strictly forbid the export of Uranium without a license issued by the NRC under any circumstance, which the Russian company (ARMZ) that controls its Canadian stake does not have and has not applied for.

I guess you weren't around for the grain embargo on the Soviets, either!

Were the shipments of "uranium" from "warheads" for "payment" towards the costs of cleaning up their mess from the Chernobyl explosion? Which begs an additional question from your "expertise" ... does the warhead "material" meet the specs for usage in nuclear power plants?