Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 650
MoneyManMatt 490
Jon Bon 408
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
George Spelvin 317
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Starscream66 303
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
sharkman29 263
Top Posters
DallasRain71374
biomed168108
Yssup Rider62981
gman4455104
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling49568
WTF48272
pyramider46430
bambino45243
The_Waco_Kid40185
CryptKicker37405
Mokoa36512
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Dr-epg34792

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-30-2016, 06:10 PM   #31
andymarksman
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 11, 2014
Location: dallas
Posts: 1,630
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post

From the image, it appears this und3r@g3 warrior is wearing a M42 Blurred Edge smock; hence, the war was in at least its third year: 1942, maybe later, when the Waffen SS was dipping into Germany's und3r@g3 pool to fill its ranks -- a fact documented in the annals of history.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bRwgWIpAynA

I don't give a rat's ass about your so-called "und3r@g3 warrior" wearing a "M42 Blurred Edge smock." Waffen SS had been issuing camouflaged uniforms to its frontline troops throughout the duration of the Second World War, so your ignorant innuendo only exposes what a sorry phony you truly are for trying to masquerade as a respectful history buff, Little Hans.
andymarksman is offline   Quote
Old 09-30-2016, 06:47 PM   #32
canuckeight
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 9, 2011
Location: I've been everywhere man!
Posts: 1,193
Encounters: 45
Default

SO ANDY IS NAZI?
canuckeight is offline   Quote
Old 09-30-2016, 07:20 PM   #33
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andymarksman View Post
I don't give a rat's ass about your so-called "und3r@g3 warrior" wearing a "M42 Blurred Edge smock." Waffen SS had been issuing camouflaged uniforms to its frontline troops throughout the duration of the Second World War, so your ignorant innuendo only exposes what a sorry phony you truly are for trying to masquerade as a respectful history buff, Little Hans.
You'd be the phony, Andy the Little Nazi Boy. Your avatar is taken from a larger picture showing four individuals -- two men and two boys -- wearing M42 Blurred Edge smocks, Andy the Little Nazi Boy. The soldiers in your 1941 video appear to be wearing the earlier version M40 Type I Oak B smock, Andy the Little Nazi Boy. Even in 1941 the Waffen SS was recruiting from a younger pool than the Wermacht, Andy the Little Nazi Boy; so, the onus is still on you to prove he is eighteen or over, Andy the Little Nazi Boy.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 09-30-2016, 11:50 PM   #34
The Motley Fool
Premium Access
 
The Motley Fool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 24, 2011
Location: Somewhere out there
Posts: 257
Encounters: 12
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by canuckeight View Post
Drumpfpanzies...When you follow a loser like Drumpf, all you do is look STUPID... it's probably Angel Dark.

Now what happened to the one of you and the Drumpfpanzies... blowing Trump?
The Motley Fool is offline   Quote
Old 10-01-2016, 09:09 AM   #35
andymarksman
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 11, 2014
Location: dallas
Posts: 1,630
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
Question again, Andy the Little Nazi Boy, would the individual depicted in your avatar be carded at most titty bars in the U.S.? Yes, he would be carded. Can you produce an ID proving he's over eighteen, Andy the Little Nazi Boy?
Perhaps he would be carded, or not. Maybe "people like you or Trump" just want to be 100% sure. But since you are the "accuser" here, the burden is on you to prove your "case" beyond "reasonable doubt," yet you fail badly thus far, Little Hans.
andymarksman is offline   Quote
Old 10-01-2016, 09:13 AM   #36
andymarksman
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 11, 2014
Location: dallas
Posts: 1,630
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by canuckeight View Post
SO ANDY IS NAZI?
Guess you are too stupid to realize you have nothing left in your "sac" to hock for a pair of pucks....
andymarksman is offline   Quote
Old 10-01-2016, 09:23 AM   #37
JD Barleycorn
Valued Poster
 
JD Barleycorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 12, 2011
Location: Olathe
Posts: 16,815
Encounters: 54
Default

Pornographic? I guess you have to go to Justice Brandeis who said he can't define it but he knows it when he sees it. Hard core pornography...no. Appearing in Playboy undressed...yes. Having sex publicly on camera...yes. I think that last definitely qualifies as pornography just as much as a Kardashian sex tape.

My question is when did she get citizenship, did she go through the normal process, and did she get special for some nefarious reason...That would be a conspiracy.
JD Barleycorn is offline   Quote
Old 10-01-2016, 09:26 AM   #38
andymarksman
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 11, 2014
Location: dallas
Posts: 1,630
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
You'd be the phony, Andy the Little Nazi Boy. Your avatar is taken from a larger picture showing four individuals -- two men and two boys -- wearing M42 Blurred Edge smocks, Andy the Little Nazi Boy.
So why not three men, or even four men? Sorry to say you are so biased in your age estimation here, you have no credibility whatsoever without proving your accusation with sound "forensic evidences," Little Hans.
andymarksman is offline   Quote
Old 10-01-2016, 09:27 AM   #39
JD Barleycorn
Valued Poster
 
JD Barleycorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 12, 2011
Location: Olathe
Posts: 16,815
Encounters: 54
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by canuckeight View Post
SO ANDY IS NAZI?
Andy has had this bad habit of choosing avatars of German soldiers or like his last choice, a SS soldier (it was required for them to be party members) who was a Nazi.
JD Barleycorn is offline   Quote
Old 10-01-2016, 09:48 AM   #40
andymarksman
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 11, 2014
Location: dallas
Posts: 1,630
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
The soldiers in your 1941 video appear to be wearing the earlier version M40 Type I Oak B smock, Andy the Little Nazi Boy. Even in 1941 the Waffen SS was recruiting from a younger pool than the Wermacht, Andy the Little Nazi Boy; so, the onus is still on you to prove he is eighteen or over, Andy the Little Nazi Boy.
Again I don't give a rat's ass about who "appear to be wearing the earlier version M40 Type I Oak B smock," because you never are the kind of "forensic expert" who could otherwise convince people even if you have "relevant exhibits" to work with. And show me right here that the Waffen SS in 1941 was recruiting members under the age of 18, or you are just making shit up here, Little Hans.
andymarksman is offline   Quote
Old 10-01-2016, 09:55 AM   #41
andymarksman
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 11, 2014
Location: dallas
Posts: 1,630
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn View Post
Andy has had this bad habit of choosing avatars of German soldiers or like his last choice, a SS soldier (it was required for them to be party members) who was a Nazi.
Here comes another "forensic expert." Show me right here an ordinary SS soldier from France or Netherland is a Nazi member.
andymarksman is offline   Quote
Old 10-01-2016, 01:45 PM   #42
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andymarksman View Post
Perhaps he would be carded, or not. Maybe "people like you or Trump" just want to be 100% sure. But since you are the "accuser" here, the burden is on you to prove your "case" beyond "reasonable doubt," yet you fail badly thus far, Little Hans.
The fact that he would be carded puts the burden of proof on you to prove that he is of age, Andy the Little Nazi Boy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by andymarksman View Post
Again I don't give a rat's ass about who "appear to be wearing the earlier version M40 Type I Oak B smock," because you never are the kind of "forensic expert" who could otherwise convince people even if you have "relevant exhibits" to work with. And show me right here that the Waffen SS in 1941 was recruiting members under the age of 18, or you are just making shit up here, Little Hans.
You'd be the ignorant fuck ignoring facts, Andy the Little Nazi Boy, the Waffen SS recruited from the Hitlerjugend to bolster its 'racial purity' agenda and began recruiting and accepting und3r@g3 enlistees as early as 1940 (pp. 205-06), while the Wehrmacht was still conscripting 20 year olds.

Quote:
Germany's "Year Groups" were called up on the following dates:

1916 - 1/10/37 -- 21 year olds
1917 - 1/10/38 -- 21 year olds
1918 - 26/8/39 -- 21 year olds
1919 - 26/8/39 -- 20 year olds
1920 - 1/10/40 -- 20 year olds
1921 - 1/2/41 -- 20 year olds
1922 - 5/9/41 -- 19 year olds
1923 - 15/4/42 -- 19 year olds
1924 - 15/10/42 -- 18 year olds
1925 - ?/5/43 -- 18 year olds
1926 - ?/12/43 -- ?? year olds
1927 - ?/7/44 -- ?? year olds
1928 - End 1944 -- ?? year olds
1929 - End March 1945 -- ?? year olds.

Quote:
Originally Posted by andymarksman View Post
So why not three men, or even four men? Sorry to say you are so biased in your age estimation here, you have no credibility whatsoever without proving your accusation with sound "forensic evidences," Little Hans.
Ask the photographer, Andy the Little Nazi Boy, he took the picture of the und3r@g3 Waffen SS soldiers wearing their M42 Burred Edge camo smocks.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 10-03-2016, 08:43 AM   #43
andymarksman
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 11, 2014
Location: dallas
Posts: 1,630
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
You'd be the ignorant fuck ignoring facts, Andy the Little Nazi Boy, the Waffen SS recruited from the Hitlerjugend to bolster its 'racial purity' agenda and began recruiting and accepting und3r@g3 enlistees as early as 1940 (pp. 205-06), while the Wehrmacht was still conscripting 20 year olds.
The only pertinent "fact" from the reference you cited is this one:

Quote:
The RJF, in fact, informed HJ leaders that long-term volunteers could enlist in the W-SS at seventeen.
But the RJF (Die Reichjugendfuhrung, the Reich Youth Leadership) has no jurisdiction to dictate the daily operations of the Waffen-SS, which has been under the direct command of Heinrich Himmler. So what the RJF had "suggested" in 1940 "that long-term volunteers could enlist in the W-SS at seventeen" is not a pertinent fact to support your argument.

On the other hand, my argument is supported by the measures that Gottlob Berger, chief of the Waffen-SS recruiting department, had undertaken in the spring of 1941:

Quote:
At the end of April[1941], Himmler ordered Berger to obtain 20,000 new recruits for the Waffen-SS by the end of May. With Hitler's authorization, the recruitment quotas were lifted by the Wehrmacht, allowing Berger an essentially free hand for a limited time. He did not disappoint, misleading the new recruits as to the length of their service obligation, and signing up 22,361 new troops by 29 May, many of whom were only 18 years old. (wiki)
So it's obvious that your citing of a "suggestion" is trumped by my presentation of the relevant facts, ignorant Little Hans.
andymarksman is offline   Quote
Old 10-03-2016, 08:50 AM   #44
andymarksman
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 11, 2014
Location: dallas
Posts: 1,630
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
1921-1/2/41--20 year olds
1922-5/9/41--19 year olds
You still have come up with nothing so support your argument.
andymarksman is offline   Quote
Old 10-03-2016, 09:05 AM   #45
andymarksman
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 11, 2014
Location: dallas
Posts: 1,630
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
Ask the photographer, Andy the Little Nazi Boy, he took the picture of the und3r@g3 Waffen SS soldiers wearing their M42 Burred Edge camo smocks.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B1taRPYSbOo

Unlike the photographer, your words can't be taken at face value since the Luftwaffe paratroopers had been issued the camouflaged uniforms as well.
andymarksman is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved