Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

dearhunter · 03-02-2015, 10:05 AM

thanck you for the clarification.......carry on

Wakeup · 03-02-2015, 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WTF

If CD knew the danger of hanging around YM who is pulling LOTO outing tail then CD is responsible for her part in the unjustified collateral damage that may happened to her.

Now who's making all the assumptions?

Look, I'm sure James Brady knew that people didn't like Reagan when he decided to become his press secretary. That doesn't mean that he was responsible for getting shot when Hinkley tried to assassinate Reagan.

If nine year old Christina-Taylor Green's dad knew that people hated Congresswoman Giffords before he decided to take his daughter to her speech, that doesn't make him responsible for her death at Loughner's hands.

Dislike Caroline all you want, call her names all you want, but please stop trying to say that she is responsible for getting herself outed simply because Marie keeps saying that they hang out together...you're completely wrong on this...

TransAm · 03-02-2015, 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wakeup

Now who's making all the assumptions?

Look, I'm sure James Brady knew that people didn't like Reagan when he decided to become his press secretary. That doesn't mean that he was responsible for getting shot when Hinkley tried to assassinate Reagan.

If nine year old Christina-Taylor Green's dad knew that people hated Congresswoman Giffords before he decided to take his daughter to her speech, that doesn't make him responsible for her death at Loughner's hands.

Dislike Caroline all you want, call her names all you want, but please stop trying to say that she is responsible for getting herself outed simply because Marie keeps saying that they hang out together...you're completely wrong on this...

Well argued. Agreed.

WTF · 03-02-2015, 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dearhunter

I see you writing that. But, it does not fit with your comment about association. You quoted a comment by CD "I just don't get it", and used that to justify the posting of her real world information. You either did it intentionally or you did it unintentionally, by taking the quote out of context to further your point........the context being that she did not get why LOTO would choose to go nuclear and post real world info about her.

I did not use it to justify it. I just explained why it might happen.

CD implied (at least in my eyes) she did not get why LOTO would do it. I did not justify it. I explained why he did it or might do it.

If you fucked Val and wu shot JaD out of revenge. If JaD asked why he got shot and I told him it was because he was friends with that wife fucking dearhunter...that ain't a justification, that's an explanation.

Quote:

Originally Posted by dearhunter

There is no justification for outing real world information...........ever.

Agreed

Quote:

Originally Posted by dearhunter

If one were to follow your logic to its natural conclusion, CD would be "justified" in dropping a real world bomb on you........ijs

No she would not be justified... but if you followed wtf I said, if in fact CD did drop some RW info on my ass and you said she did so because I called her out on her narcissistic bullshit and she did not care for it , you'd not be justifying what she did but explaining why she did it. As wrong as wtf she did may be.

WTF · 03-02-2015, 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YummyMarie

Correction...women who disagree with him are likely to create a menace of him for life.

Not true , I fuck with both men and women who fuck with me. If you do not believe that and are trying to make this some sexist/femnist thing, you need to visit the political forum.

I never have a problem with folks who think, debate fair and do not make false accusations toward me.

I am debating wu and dh on what was said or meant. I have no problem with that.

Some of you others want to debate with your feelings. I have no time for that bullshit. I care about facts, not your feelings. I've been rather cunty about that fact.

TransAm · 03-02-2015, 10:36 AM

This thread has been a real public service for those of us who don't camp out here everyday.

WTF · 03-02-2015, 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wakeup

Now who's making all the assumptions?

Look, I'm sure James Brady knew that people didn't like Reagan when he decided to become his press secretary. That doesn't mean that he was responsible for getting shot when Hinkley tried to assassinate Reagan.

If nine year old Christina-Taylor Green's dad knew that people hated Congresswoman Giffords before he decided to take his daughter to her speech, that doesn't make him responsible for her death at Loughner's hands.

Dislike Caroline all you want, call her names all you want, but please stop trying to say that she is responsible for getting herself outed simply because Marie keeps saying that they hang out together...you're completely wrong on this...

Below is my entire quote...which taken in context seems to negate your post.

But I will address your other cases in relation to this case.

Had Brady known that someone was gunning for Reagan that day and decided to go anyway, yes he would be responsible for being shot to a degree.

Had Christina-Taylor Green's dad knew that people hated Congresswoman Giffords before he decided to take his daughter to her speech and were gunning for her that day ...he damn sure would be responsible to a degree.

So I stick to my contention that CD knows the danger, seems is willing to take it and is a fucking loon for coming on here and asking why an outer outs.

Quote:

Originally Posted by WTF

That is a whole bunch of assumptions. Each case is unique.

Let us stick to this one.

If CD knew the danger of hanging around YM who is pulling LOTO outing tail then CD is responsible for her part in the unjustified collateral damage that may happened to her.

Her trying to blame others for not liking her and implying they are responsible for telling LOTO to out her is LD's narcissistic wack-a-do kicking in again. .

LuckOfTheOrient · 03-02-2015, 10:39 AM

If I outed or threatened to out someone I believe per the rules my privileges to this site would of been revoked by now.
I believe five days is long enough for any needed investigation.

Camille Fox · 03-02-2015, 10:41 AM

WTF is better at BB and STD threADs, js...

Wakeup · 03-02-2015, 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WTF

Had Brady known that someone was gunning for Reagan that day and decided to go anyway, yes he would be responsible for being shot to a degree.

Had Christina-Taylor Green's dad knew that people hated Congresswoman Giffords before he decided to take his daughter to her speech and were gunning for her that day ...he damn sure would be responsible to a degree.

Dude...I gave you an out...and you doubled down on stupid...

There's not a person on this board who is going to agree with you on this, now that you've made it very clear how you stand...the rest of us will blame the shooter, you can stand in the corner and shout at the top of your lungs that the victim is to blame...

Have fun...

dearhunter · 03-02-2015, 10:57 AM

WTF, you are the one who said that CD needs to accept "responsibility for her actions". You further state that the act of being friends with YM could cause her harm.....that she then becomes responsible for.

The implication being that she is responsible for LOTO outing her real world information, simply by her association with YM.

Using that logic everyone here who was outed by AlyssaXOXO is responsible for whatever real world information is posted on them here.......because, they all chose to irritate her.

You are building this house on quicksand.

WTF · 03-02-2015, 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wakeup

Dude...I gave you an out...and you doubled down on stupid...

There's not a person on this board who is going to agree with you on this, now that you've made it very clear how you stand...the rest of us will blame the shooter, you can stand in the corner and shout at the top of your lungs that the victim is to blame...

Have fun...

Now you're not being nice and are calling me stupid or maybe that was you being nice! ...

I'm not sure how stupid it is to not understand the meaning of in relation to this case and responsible for being shot to a degree.

I'm not saying that it is completely her fault if LOTO outs her, I'm saying that she can not blame say you or me for her being friends with YM. That is wtf I said. You have tried to twist this into me trying to blame CD for getting herself in a pickle, which I do to some degree! Is it her fault if LOTO outs her? No and I have not tried to make it all so but you can't hang out in a war zone and not take any responsibility for getting shot.

dearhunter · 03-02-2015, 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LuckOfTheOrient

If I outed or threatened to out someone I believe per the rules my privileges to this site would of been revoked by now.
I believe five days is long enough for any needed investigation.

Dude, even the fucktard attempting to explain away your actions has to accept the premis that you did it.

You know you did it........I know you did it. You and I both know what those numbers are in reference to.

You have chosen your bed.......now, sleep in it.

You're not in Washington any more.........ijs

JustMeCLTXGG · 03-02-2015, 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wakeup

Look, I'm sure James Brady knew that people didn't like Reagan when he decided to become his press secretary. That doesn't mean that he was responsible for getting shot when Hinkley tried to assassinate Reagan

Quote:

Originally Posted by WTF

Had Brady known that someone was gunning for Reagan that day and decided to go anyway, yes he would be responsible for being shot to a degree.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wakeup

...the rest of us will blame the shooter, you can stand in the corner and shout at the top of your lungs that the victim is to blame.

disregarding the rest of the hypocritcal BS going on in this thread, this has to be the poorest example posted.

are you really trying to say if someone hangs around the President of the United States of America they should not be on alert? If that was the case why the hell does he need a bullet proof limo (basically a tank on regular rims/tires) and all the secret service following them around everywhere?

no, I'm not blaming the victims but damn, yeah they should have some real world expectations about what could happen hanging around such a figure. and that's regardless if the exact moment such a thing is going to happen is known or not. as in his Bin Laden example. pretty sure all those turds in his complex were aware they were in the worst place in the world and had expectations...hence the no LOS's and tall ass walls.

and this is in no way my opinion of this thread...just that poor example. as many here are fond of finishing with...ijs

dearhunter · 03-02-2015, 11:13 AM

I agree, Just.......I thought that was a poor example as well.

Anyone who hangs with a president is given the standard spill about the dangers involved. That does not imply responsibility.

I don't remember a ECCIE notice upon declaring ones friendship with a hooktard of the real world dangers involved.........maybe the hooktards get a different welcome notice.