SCOTUS Refuses review of opinions striking down gay marriage bans

[Yssup Rider]

Yeah, they're coming for your chiffon poodle skirt, IBIdiot!

You're on the homo hit list.

They're going to you mind control to turn you. Better call the haz-mat crew.

[CuteOldGuy]

Point of order. The Constitution does not grant any rights. It protects rights. At least it used to. But I digress. The rights enumerated in the Declaration of Independence, and protected by the Constitution are natural rights, inherent to all human beings. You don't have rights because you're an American, you have rights because you exist. The Constution was our Founders' attempt to make sure our rights were protected from government, not by government.

Carry on.

[Old-T]

You know the teacher's sexual orientation how?

What you demonstrated is you have one idiotic teacher. Assuming that is the whole story.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

. You don't have rights because you're an American, you have rights because you exist.

Carry on.

Go to Mexico and or Saudi Arabia and wave the Constitution in their face!

[I B Hankering]

Gay columnist: let’s face it, we want to indoctrinate children
05/19/2011 at 3:32 PM By Catholic Citizens of Illinois

As the same-sex “marriage” battle heats up again in New York, one writer at a prominent gay news source is questioning why his lobby refuses to admit that the gay agenda involves “indoctrinating” schoolchildren to accept homosexuality.

Queerty contributor Daniel Villarreal [LGBT activist & Texas professor] criticized (WARNING site contains inappropriate images) the homosexual movement’s knee-jerk reaction against accusations of meddling in public schools. Villarreal pointed to a recent National Organization for Marriage (NOM) ad launched in New York that points out how homosexual indoctrination has been introduced in Massachusetts and California schools.

While gay activists usually deny that they want to indoctrinate children, said Villarreal, “let’s face it-that’s a lie.” “We want educators to teach future generations of children to accept queer sexuality. In fact, our very future depends on it,” he wrote.

(sarcasm on) Yeah, right, there's no LGBT agenda (sarcasm off).

[Yssup Rider]

Uh, so you advocate less education (the LGBTQIA, Tex., agenda) and more homophobia (the RWW agenda) and disregard for the fucking constitution.

Is that what you're saying, Tinkie Winkie?

Sure sounds like it.

Might as well face it, you're....

[Old-T]

Poor IB.

Accept does not mean "become". It means "accept", as in don't discriminate against them--just as most people believe we should refrain from discriminating against other people for no valid reason.

And while are on "agendas" I have never seen by gay neighbors go door to door being obnoxious and overbearing as I see (and have been subjected to) by various religious groups. THAT is an attempt to convert and goes well past "acceptance". Do you support Thumpers far more agressive agenda of conversion?

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Old-T

Poor IB.

Accept does not mean "become". It means "accept", as in don't discriminate against them--just as most people believe we should refrain from discriminating against other people for no valid reason.

And while are on "agendas" I have never seen by gay neighbors go door to door being obnoxious and overbearing as I see (and have been subjected to) by various religious groups. THAT is an attempt to convert and goes well past "acceptance". Do you support Thumpers far more agressive agenda of conversion?

Poor Old-THUMPER, he doesn't understand the definition of "indoctrinate" ...

INDOCTRINATE

2 : to imbue ["hardwire", Old-THUMPER, i.e., "become"] with a usually partisan or sectarian opinion, point of view, or principle

... or that "indoctrination" isn't done "door-to-door"; it's done from the lectern in government mandated schools where parents are coerced by law to send their kids, Old-THUMPER. Read -- and this time fuckin' comprehend -- WTF LGBT Activist, Professor Villarreal said, Old-THUMPER.

[Yssup Rider]

Poor IBIdiot.

Do you or do you NOT advocate less education (the LGBTQIA, Tex., agenda) and more homophobia (the RWW agenda) and disregard for the fucking constitution?

Call people your stupid people names (that only you understand btw) all day long. But the fact is that you haven't the courage of your convictions... or indictments!

And, oh yeah, a PROFESSOR obviously doesn't mean jackshit. Your blow buddy JDIdiot claims to be a professor. Whiny claims to be a professor.

You're a fucking idiot of the highest order. Maybe you'll get a PhD-C for your outstanding work in smearing shit over yourself and others.

Then we can call YOU professor, GED, with Associated Master's Degree!

[rioseco]

Originally Posted by Old-T

So long as what they come back for are parts of those American rights you referenced--i.e. those any other American expects--I will completely support them and will call anyone who opposes it based on their sexual agenda a bigot. As soon as they start asking for "extra" benefits I will be opposing them. Unlike you I refuse to say they should be second class citizens because "I know" that somewhere down the line they will ask for extra rights. Since you cannot point out where that has happened so far, and since there are plenty of areas where they do not have equal rights, I do consider your perspective today to be homophobic.

I answered both of your questions severa times and still you whine like the little commie cunt that you are. Just because you dont agree with my repsponse does not mean that I did not answer your questions.
Whatever you say cock breath !
Your support stems from the fact that you lie awake fantasizing about marrying your gay brother as well !

[rioseco]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Worthy? By who's standards? YOURS?

What is your ethnic background, if I may be so bold?

How do you even put these groups together? How about the NRA? Do you support the NRA's right to "any fucking thing?" How about the church? Obviously, your watch is missing a few gears.

Or you're just plain stupid.

Or worse yet, you're SLOBBRIN!

Ok bring on more attacks of conservatives right now, because like that other fucking homo retard Old- Tranny, I am going to truthfully answer your questions as well Ass-Up Homo-2

1) Not that it is any of your business but I am of European and Native American bloodlines.
2) I gave a list of groups as an example of special interest, you fucking moron.
3) I do not support any church/religious lobbyist if that is what you refer to.
4) No I am not with or for the NRA either.
and lastly you Ass-Up and Old-Tranny go play hide the pecker IN each other and work out your frustrations, you know you want it !

[rioseco]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Point of order. The Constitution does not grant any rights. It protects rights. At least it used to. But I digress. The rights enumerated in the Declaration of Independence, and protected by the Constitution are natural rights, inherent to all human beings. You don't have rights because you're an American, you have rights because you exist. The Constution was our Founders' attempt to make sure our rights were protected from government, not by government.

Carry on.

The constitution and bill of rights are not for all people.It is for Americans. There are 4 billion people on the planet and our constitution can not be enforced world wide to all peoples thoughout all nations. It can only be resourced on American soil. Thats why when you get arrested in Mexico or Russia or China you are so screwed. Our laws do not apply in these places.

[Old-T]

Originally Posted by rioseco

I answered both of your questions severa times and still you whine like the little commie cunt that you are. Just because you dont agree with my repsponse does not mean that I did not answer your questions.
Whatever you say cock breath !
Your support stems from the fact that you lie awake fantasizing about marrying your gay brother as well !

Let's examine the evidence:

1. Refuses to answer simple, straight forward questions that will embarrass him.
2. Claims he did answer questions when instead he answered what he hoped the question was.
3. When backed into a corner he lies and disavows his own words, or claims he was misquoted.
4. If that fails, claims anyone who opposes his view is a homosexual, and therefore subhuman.
5. If seriously homophobic to the point that "he doth protest too much" comes to mind.

Yes, there is little discernable difference between IBM and Rio.

[CuteOldGuy]

Originally Posted by rioseco

The constitution and bill of rights are not for all people.It is for Americans. There are 4 billion people on the planet and our constitution can not be enforced world wide to all peoples thoughout all nations. It can only be resourced on American soil. Thats why when you get arrested in Mexico or Russia or China you are so screwed. Our laws do not apply in these places.

That is true. The Constitution only protects Americans. My point is that our rights predate the Constitution, and are inherent to all. The fact that other countries, and now ours to a greater and greater degree, fail to recognize or protect those rights does not mean they do not exist.

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

That is true. The Constitution only protects Americans. My point is that our rights predate the Constitution, and are inherent to all. The fact that other countries, and now ours to a greater and greater degree, fail to recognize or protect those rights does not mean they do not exist.

I kinda agree with that, but I wonder who you thing gave us those inherent rights?