Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Maximum4 · 08-13-2014, 08:19 PM

[QUOTE=The Drummer;1055677811]

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnnyCap

I don't doubt you believe that and I don't disagree but the blanket statements judging strictly at $ aren't universally applicable.

You're quite a smart man, JC. You beat me to the punch.

Throwing money at something or, in this instance, someone isn't necessarily a holistic approach to be applied as a cure-all or as a means to add value.

Which blanket statements were these?

JohnnyCap · 08-13-2014, 10:21 PM

"I have rarely been satisfied or happy when I've given a provider less than Benjamin." & "Low balling a provider for under a Benjamin is pretty despicable."

Maximum4 · 08-14-2014, 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnnyCap

"I have rarely been satisfied or happy when I've given a provider less than Benjamin."

Using the word "rarely" disqualifies the sentence as a blanket statement.

Maximum4 · 08-14-2014, 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnnyCap

"Low balling a provider for under a Benjamin is pretty despicable."

I suppose this IS opinion, but it's not a blanket statement.

Anyways, it's despicable to me because a Benjamin is already so low, it's my opinion to ask them to drop even further is self-centric beyond decency.

I would think the provider already has self value issues because she's selling her body. To low-ball her because one can take advantage of her desperation for income is IMHO despicable.

pyramider · 08-14-2014, 07:28 PM

Hell, fucktards would be complaining if the ladies were not charging anything and Jim Bob got a sandwich ... Now about those taint photos ...

Plastic Man · 08-14-2014, 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maximum4

I would think the provider already has self value issues because she's selling her body. To low-ball her because one can take advantage of her desperation for income is IMHO despicable.

whatever helps jimmie ...justify his criminal ...behavior and ...sleep better at night

...some great philosophizin on this here site

Guest072323 · 08-14-2014, 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnnyCap

"I have rarely been satisfied or happy when I've given a provider less than Benjamin." & "Low balling a provider for under a Benjamin is pretty despicable."

I'll disagree.
I have four girls that are happy to blow and or fuck me for Fifty bucks or less on a regular basis.
I always know what I'm going to get... and it is always a spectacular session.
And it's not that I'm easy to please.

I have at least a half dozen more that accept a c-note (or less) from me and call me with "specials" all the time.

I'll splurge every once in a while... and when I do... I let those girls know what I'm willing to pay for a second visit....

I'm sure that part of my success has to do with being a rockstar.... but most of it is just me being me.
Ever bring a five dollar bottle of wine with you for your date???
It's more than the bottle of wine... it's the thought that counts....

Fuckin thinking.....

Doove · 08-14-2014, 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paulwantsya

I'll disagree.
I have four girls that are happy to blow and or fuck me for Fifty bucks or less on a regular basis.
I always know what I'm going to get... and it is always a spectacular session.
And it's not that I'm easy to please.

I have at least a half dozen more that accept a c-note (or less) from me and call me with "specials" all the time.

I'll splurge every once in a while... and when I do... I let those girls know what I'm willing to pay for a second visit....

I'm sure that part of my success has to do with being a rockstar.... but most of it is just me being me.
Ever bring a five dollar bottle of wine with you for your date???
It's more than the bottle of wine... it's the thought that counts....

Fuckin thinking.....

Crunchman's got nothin' on you, big guy!

JohnnyCap · 08-14-2014, 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maximum4

I suppose this IS opinion, but it's not a blanket statement.

Anyways, it's despicable to me because a Benjamin is already so low, it's my opinion to ask them to drop even further is self-centric beyond decency.

I would think the provider already has self value issues because she's selling her body. To low-ball her because one can take advantage of her desperation for income is IMHO despicable.

So products and services under $100 cannot be haggled upon, and taking advantage of need is despicable.

I'm pretty damn sure they take advantage of mine. As do most professionals, and capitalists. It is in the damn word, capitalize.

We so need a plague.

Plastic Man · 08-14-2014, 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnnyCap

We so need a plague.

its coming

Guest072323 · 08-14-2014, 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doove

Crunchman's got nothin' on you, big guy!

Just like you.....
Like I keep saying... I thought you'd be a better foil....
I stand corrected....
Can't be right all the time I guess....

Doove · 08-15-2014, 04:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paulwantsya

Just like you.....

Yeah, just like me.

Quote:

Like I keep saying... I thought you'd be a better foil....
I stand corrected....
Can't be right all the time I guess....

Says Mr. I-know-you-are-but-what-am-I.

The Drummer · 08-15-2014, 05:15 AM

[QUOTE=Maximum4;1055679432]

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Drummer

Which blanket statements were these?

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnnyCap

"I have rarely been satisfied or happy when I've given a provider less than Benjamin." & "Low balling a provider for under a Benjamin is pretty despicable."

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maximum4

Using the word "rarely" disqualifies the sentence as a blanket statement.

Not taking sides, just speaking pragmatically that money alone doesn’t define a superior encounter. That’s only my opinion, of course.

Rarely or regularly being satisfied of the outcome is variable. The operative term here is money. Does more or less money have a non-wavering, positive or negative effect on the experience? That’s what was perceived as the “blanket statement”.

For example, I’ve met many women who have pushed the envelope – money wise – on me. As our relationship progressed they began to jack up the price. And guess what? Our time together became progressively worse, and through no fault of my own.

Pay more, get less. And I’m not talking strictly about “activities”. Overall attitudes, running the breadth of all things, also worsened. I concede, these are my experiences and not necessarily the experiences of others.

News Flash: Some women will take advantage of good-hearted guys no matter what!!!

Just my 2 cents, for what it's worth.

Maximum4 · 08-15-2014, 06:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnnyCap

So products and services under $100 cannot be haggled upon, and taking advantage of need is despicable.

Products and services? I suppose if you look at it this way, you can haggle them down to a dollar and avoid what's really going on. But, unfortunately, providers are people and IMHO the hobbyist USUALLY has the advantage. The cash. The upper position.

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnnyCap

I'm pretty damn sure they take advantage of mine. As do most professionals, and capitalists. It is in the damn word, capitalize.

On the upper of the price range, a provider can take advantage of a hobbyist, but WE can always walk away in MOST cases.

On the lower end of the price range, the hobbyist is not getting taken advantage of. I mean...c'mon.... If a hobbyist thinks he's "getting taken" because he's not getting pussy for $60 bucks when they ask for $100, I think that hobbyist needs to really examine where he's at. Getting into that zone in the hobby implies financial issues, lack of balance, and deeper sexual dysfunction than most.

onehunglo157 · 08-15-2014, 07:36 AM

I am ready now what area is your incall??