Attention New Ladies or Ladies that remember when they were new and someone offered to help them get verified.....

[Hiker78]

Originally Posted by JJ

I can't remember if I did it after she got a review, or if someone else verified her.

Her first review was a month ago JJ

[SofaKingFun]

Perhaps it was because of her reviews. These reviews can also be used in the Verification process...

So if we find out *when they met* and compare that date with the date she was verified, we can establish the validity of her, "24 hours later", claim.

If it happens that her verification occurred at a time consistent with that of her 2nd review and that time was significantly different than the time they met, it sort of blows her story out of the water, wouldn't you agree?

So, Once again. When exactly did they meet and when was she actually verified?

The time line is critical here and you do not have these answers.

Summer, JJ, and the other mods/Admins, are the only ones who can answer these questions.

.

.

[Guest070514-2]

I guess the thing that sticks out to me is in her post she stated he was with her for some time while in his account he was there for only mins..... That alone an show the difference in everything to me. If he spent time with her and verified her 24 hrs later she is telling the truth, if he didn't spend time with her how DID she get verified then if he was with her for mins and had red flags?

I'm just saying....

[dearhunter]

Best case scenario is that JJ was an idiot and made a comedic remark about "no sex for money" which the whore took to mean he wanted a freebie........and it went down hill from there.

Worst case scenario is that JJ tried to get a freebie from a pimped whore and got caught with his hands in the cookie jar...........and got what he deserved.

I blame the pimp.........ijs

[dearhunter]

Originally Posted by SofaKingFun

Perhaps it was because of her reviews. These reviews can also be used in the Verification process...

So if we find out *when they met* and compare that date with the date she was verified, we can establish the validity of her, "24 hours later", claim.

If it happens that her verification occurred at a time consistent with that of her 2nd review and that time was significantly different than the time they met, it sort of blows her story out of the water, wouldn't you agree?

So, Once again. When exactly did they meet and when was she actually verified?

The time line is critical here and you do not have these answers.

Summer, JJ, and the other mods/Admins, are the only ones who can answer these questions.

.

.

She had a website........she only needed one more vouch to meet the requirements.

She met the required second vouch the moment aznlochness posted his review of her on the 27th.

If as she claims she was given VP before her review was approved, she had to be talking to admin directly........in which case, JJ would not be involved in her VP process.

[Hiker78]

Sofa a lot of things could put this to rest. JJ can't remember/has no records and now went missing. Chica chaser said in the GFX thread that many things were going on behind the seens and that the wheels of justice turn slowly I wonder if they are turning right now?

[Hiker78]

Originally Posted by JJ

This is going to turn into a whole he said/she said hate thread. So, let me explain my side of the story before things get too crazy.

Summer appeared on the board back on November. She was new on the board, she didn't have reviews, and she was interested in becoming a verified provider. She caught my eye, because the pics she used when she first showed up looked extremely young and I wanted to make sure she was at least 18 years old.

I asked her if she knew any verified providers or well known hobbyists that would be willing to vouch for her. She gave me the name of a verified provider (VP) she knew and I contacted that VP. I asked the VP friend if she was willing to vouch for her friend. Her friend did not want to vouch for her. I should have left it alone, but her age still bothered me.

I asked Summer if she wanted to meet and she agreed. I was talking with her on the phone until I arrived and parked. There was a suspicious individual lounging in the parking lot. He got on the phone and started looking my way a minute after I got off the phone with Summer. This made me suspicious.

I arrived at the room and I was glad to meet a lady that didn't look as young as her pics. We had a nice conversation, but I was still suspicious. I didn't know if this lady was a scam artist, working with LE, or someone working for reporter. I asked if she wanted to do this and move things along. We had not discussed a donation at this point and I did not want to do so with someone that I didn't know or trust yet.

She seemed receptive to me, so I advanced forward and then asked for money. I simply grinned and told her that I did not trade money for sex, because that was illegal. After that, she clammed up and I understood that there was nothing that I could say to turn things around. So I simply said good bye and I left. Now many of you are thinking if I was going to leave the lady empty handed. Of course not. I just wasn't going to risk myself even more than I already had and become ensnared by LE or the Six O'Clock News.

The moment I walked out, the same suspicious guy started texting and giving me the evil eye.

I think that this was just a misunderstanding on both our parts, and I apologize to the young lady if she thought that I was going to take advantage of her.

He remembered it in November here but forgets later on in the thread. Also he remembers states a verified provider he contacted refused to vouch for her.

[Beagle]

I'm not going to debate the specifics. SKF's analysis is pretty fair based on the information we have out in the open so far. Hiker has valid doubts as well.

I'm just waiting for other provider(s) to step up and speak up on their experience with JJ. I've heard it, but the rest of you have not.

Granted, JJ will likely have a good explanation for his experience with the other provider(s), too, and should be given a chance to defend his position.

I just hope he'll take the first step, and apologize for any other misunderstandings he could have caused instead of forcing the other girl(s) to speak up before he explains himself.

PS. Any other providers with a story..... feel free to PM Whispers or myself. We can get your story out here, while protecting your privacy.

[Hiker78]

[dearhunter]

You bitches do know the whore is pimped.......right?

Doesn't that give JJ a mulligan?

[Hiker78]

Two wrongs do not make a right. I do not know if she's pimped and that's not what I am debating here, whether she is possibly pimped or not is never a reason for further attempts to exploit her. Especially by a moderator!

[dearhunter]

I thought you retards hated pimps more than modtards

[Hiker78]

I dislike anybody who uses power to exploit somebody.

[Hiker78]

36 hours and yet no sign of JJ or other S.A. Staff to clear this up.

[Whispers]

Let me add a couple of things..... Shed a little light

In her conversation to me, when she was still not verified the following day she raised the concern to someone, I don't know who, and provided information trying to get this looked into. Without a text, email or PM she logged in and found herself verified shortly afterwards.

She stated that it was almost 2 months later... looks like about 6 weeks to me... before she got her first review and that a question she asked regarding information about someone in infoshare did not get responded to where all other ladies asking were given the information.... something to do with an alert.... She did not understand the way things work and "supposed" that in some manner she was being blacklisted behind the scenes in private forums or something. I shared my reasoning with her regarding why it took that long. She was new, unreviewed and $300 an hour in a market with less expensive ladies.

She felt someone should have actually communicated with her in some manner regarding the "investigation", results and that she should have received an apology from JJ.... Instead she was given Verified Provider status and ignored..... See her comments and you may see some reference that makes sense in light of what I am sharing. I had to ask her for more explanation.

It does seem that she received verified provider status long before her first review and without the requirements met after a MOD walks away feeling she was underage, LE or media, pimped and the reference she provided would not verify her. Logic seems that it would take a lot to overcome all that.

Unless someone was afraid of a story coming out.....

Maybe it was someone else looking out for JJ.... we don't know...

Is there more? Yeah. I'm sure more than a few can tell there is more. Hopefully it will find it's way to the thread from the ladies instead of me.