Main Menu |
Most Favorited Images |
Recently Uploaded Images |
Most Liked Images |
Top Reviewers |
cockalatte |
650 |
MoneyManMatt |
490 |
Jon Bon |
408 |
Still Looking |
399 |
samcruz |
399 |
Harley Diablo |
377 |
honest_abe |
362 |
DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
George Spelvin |
302 |
Starscream66 |
299 |
Chung Tran |
288 |
lupegarland |
287 |
nicemusic |
285 |
You&Me |
281 |
sharkman29 |
262 |
|
Top Posters |
DallasRain | 71283 | biomed1 | 67094 | Yssup Rider | 62575 | gman44 | 54741 | LexusLover | 51038 | offshoredrilling | 49339 | WTF | 48272 | pyramider | 46416 | bambino | 44935 | The_Waco_Kid | 39447 | CryptKicker | 37379 | Mokoa | 36499 | Chung Tran | 36100 | Still Looking | 35944 | Dr-epg | 33524 |
|
|
10-28-2013, 11:55 PM
|
#46
|
BANNED
Join Date: Mar 14, 2011
Location: Welcome Sections
Posts: 35,944
|
[QUOTE=JohnnyYanks;1054372449]Who doesn't love a good story? I know I do.
Of course, I do tend to be very selective about the fiction writers I read so I hope your new work will be non-fiction. And I am curious if your San Antonio "sources" will be kept hidden, like the Austin Invisible Three?[/QUOTE]
Huh...
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
10-29-2013, 12:22 AM
|
#47
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 5, 2010
Location: All Over
Posts: 1,057
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PDid
I'm kind of freaking out here a little. In a span of less than 72 hours, this OP has gone from mildly amusing, to extremely irritating, to obnoxious and boring. Are you sure you're not my ex-wife?
|
Nah bro, don't freak out. It seems to me that the OP has shown over the years that he is a HUGE narcissistic troll that thrives on posting threads meant to irritate or at least be controversial. He calls in his troll minions to back him and drive up the views and post counts (which he seems to thrive on). It wouldn't surprise me one bit if he instructed his minions to look at his posts as often as they can just to drive up the views and skew the actual views.
So don't freak out just ignore him, he probably wont go away, but we can always hope... Maybe if he is so hell bent on making sure that the unpaid and unappreciated mods are doing there jobs, he should sit down with the owners and offer his services as "head moderator".
I would also suggest that IF he actually does get complaints from members, why doesn't he just take it to the admins, but that has been suggested before and he states that he would rather do it in public or something similar. It seems to me that he is just another post whore looking for attention. More power to him, it works and he gets what he wants, attention, views and posts. Hell even I'm guilty of it now... LOL
|
|
Quote
 | 2 users liked this post
|
10-29-2013, 12:36 AM
|
#48
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Apr 25, 2009
Location: sa tx usa
Posts: 15,325
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whispers
...
Well..... I am considered one of the most controversial posters on the board, in your face with material that drives traffic........ bringing out more than one scandal over the years involving people most thought they could trust........
and my point count has never crossed 12.... soooooo....... I think I have a pretty fair understanding of the rules.....
|
Never asked if you caused controversy, turned allegiances of members, counted coup or questioned your understanding of the rules.
Asked if you could tell or send a link of the Standard Operating Procedures of Moderators in ALL AREAS of this site.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whispers
...
BUT the guidelines that control the board in it's entirety have to be maintained and although they may dislike it and have never experienced it...... well..... they will find that they either support it or will need to mod in some other place....
.....
|
Great! Where is it?
I'll keep from doing the bullet post since people can go back to the one i've quoted here.
Not interested in the hearsay people PM you.
And surprised that since you know some of the Powers that be very chumily (sp), you can't get a gold bound copy of the SOP.
As to the, for the better lack of words trying to interpret, self-serving Mods, you can shake out and expose the ugly. But that will leave a new ugly to take its place. I'll keep the evil I know until one that is proven to be more fun can take its place.
Bed time for this Bonzo.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
10-29-2013, 12:37 AM
|
#49
|
BANNED
Join Date: Oct 28, 2013
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 50
|
Minions? hahahaha don't think so...... We all dance to a different beat! And every response drives up the count, including this one to your post count raising post. And all the folks who click to see what is said next....... It's the way the site works. Come to think of it, your post is the reason we get all the damn pop ups
Oh and precious, you have no choice in what evil shall reign here!
That decision comes from much further up the food chain than yourself!
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
10-29-2013, 07:31 AM
|
#50
|
Hope I haven't bored you!
Join Date: Apr 30, 2009
Location:
Posts: 19,474
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Precious_b
I'll keep the evil I know until one that is proven to be more fun can take its place.
|
ehhh.... Sometimes you need to get rid of the old to make room for the new...
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
10-29-2013, 07:53 AM
|
#51
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Aug 14, 2011
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 2,280
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Still Looking
So "rule" #30 can be broken if no one complains? Well I guess that also explains all the Coed ADS.
|
Bent is a better way to look at it than broken. Same with the threAds. Realistically this is a marketing site for the ladies. Everything they post has the potential to get them business. It would be very boring here without their involvement.
I am still curious as to why people that don't live in this community have a corn cob up their ass about rule 30. Simply breaking a rule as a cause for this silliness does not make sense since we are all involved in a rule breaking activity.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
10-29-2013, 08:02 AM
|
#52
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Feb 25, 2013
Location: Maine to Spain
Posts: 586
|
Are points being given out to the rulebreakers?
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
10-29-2013, 08:21 AM
|
#53
|
BANNED
Join Date: Oct 28, 2013
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 50
|
Gee I thought it was a information exchange site, where they provided 2 different forums for ads, guess they need to change the name?
How about PAPC.net (provider ad placement center)?
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
10-29-2013, 08:25 AM
|
#54
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Mar 13, 2012
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 7,027
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sargent D
Gee I thought it was a information exchange site ...
|
When are you going to start exchanging some information, Sarge? Blather don't count.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
10-29-2013, 08:41 AM
|
#55
|
Hope I haven't bored you!
Join Date: Apr 30, 2009
Location:
Posts: 19,474
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laz
Many people here other than CK have played very loosely with rule 30. Clearly we as a community are ok with it since no one else has publicly complained and Mokoa's inaction leads me to believe that he has not received private complaints. It would be interesting to know why it is such a big deal to you since you have stated that you disagree with it. If you are just a stickler for following rules I would be surprised since this hobby is against the rules.
|
I am by no means a stickler for following rules....
I do believe however that those that step up to moderate have a responsibility to the owners as well as the communities to enforce the guidelines set down fairly .... whether they agree with them or not.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
10-29-2013, 08:53 AM
|
#56
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Mar 13, 2012
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 7,027
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Still Looking
... Huh...
|
You're not familiar with the Austin Invisible Three? They are the supporting characters in this lively narrative: http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?...hlight=19trees
Unfortunately, because they are invisible, they never received much acclaim. (Or maybe the author just hogged it all?)
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
10-29-2013, 09:03 AM
|
#57
|
BANNED
Join Date: Mar 14, 2011
Location: Welcome Sections
Posts: 35,944
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laz
Bent is a better way to look at it than broken. Same with the threAds. Realistically this is a marketing site for the ladies. Everything they post has the potential to get them business. It would be very boring here without their involvement.
I agree... I love the ladies involvement. So many have lots of great things to say. But the site has rules. its simple you follow the rules or there are consequences. When a forum doesn't enforce the rules like in other forums then people get pissed. And why wouldn't they? when you see a forum where the preponderance of the coed threads are ADS it gets a little frustrating. It's NOT my job or your job to put a stop to it. It's the MODS JOB! same goes for image violations and rule #30. Lets face it, when you mix guys (MODS) and ladies (PUSSY) at times they are motivated by different things. The site is littered with dead MODS proving this fact.
I am still curious as to why people that don't live in this community have a corn cob up their ass about rule 30. Simply breaking a rule as a cause for this silliness does not make sense since we are all involved in a rule breaking activity.
|
Once again I agree. I have broken the rules. I have the points and warnings to prove it. I do my very best to follow the rules. Do you really think it's fair to allow providers to come into coed with their big ass sig lines and start meaningless threADS? Is that fair to the other ladies who follow the rules. Feel free to give me links to threads started by ladies here that are hobby related and not ads that are interesting and hobby related. I'll then forward the threADS that are ADS. Me thinks you'll be amazed.
As for rule #30... its pretty simple and straight forward. Shut that bitch down as specified. How can anyone get pissed at a MOD for following the rules? It's the right thing to do.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
10-29-2013, 09:04 AM
|
#58
|
BANNED
Join Date: Mar 14, 2011
Location: Welcome Sections
Posts: 35,944
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by coolaid
Are points being given out to the rulebreakers?
|
Hell no.... it depends on the rule breaker.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
10-29-2013, 09:09 AM
|
#59
|
BANNED
Join Date: Mar 14, 2011
Location: Welcome Sections
Posts: 35,944
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyYanks
You're not familiar with the Austin Invisible Three? They are the supporting characters in this lively narrative: http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?...hlight=19trees
Unfortunately, because they are invisible, they never received much acclaim. (Or maybe the author just hogged it all?)
|
Still have no idea who or what your talking about. JY your pretty straight forward just say what you have to say.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
10-29-2013, 09:29 AM
|
#60
|
Dr. Wonderful
Join Date: Dec 30, 2009
Location: Globe Trotter
Posts: 27,229
|
SL, the ladies who post threADs are not breaking any rules. ThreADs have been determined (by the top brass) to be "look at me threads", which by extension are drama threads.
When a provider/agency posts a threAD (this one is an example http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=878712 ), the thread is open to any and all views in regards to whatever is stated by the OP in the threAD. It can become the playground for anyone who wants to fuck with the thread. SL touched on the edge of what is possible in post #23.
When GFX posts that shit in Houston, it gets turned sideways very quickly on purpose. Why? Because like the threAD, it is not against the rules.
The problems arise when a moderator decides to intervene on behalf of the OP.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
Find Ladies |
Hot Women |
|