Main Menu |
Most Favorited Images |
Recently Uploaded Images |
Most Liked Images |
Top Reviewers |
cockalatte |
650 |
MoneyManMatt |
490 |
Jon Bon |
408 |
Still Looking |
399 |
samcruz |
399 |
Harley Diablo |
377 |
honest_abe |
362 |
George Spelvin |
315 |
DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
Starscream66 |
301 |
Chung Tran |
288 |
lupegarland |
287 |
nicemusic |
285 |
You&Me |
281 |
sharkman29 |
263 |
|
Top Posters |
DallasRain | 71340 | biomed1 | 67774 | Yssup Rider | 62904 | gman44 | 55035 | LexusLover | 51038 | offshoredrilling | 49505 | WTF | 48272 | pyramider | 46429 | bambino | 45243 | The_Waco_Kid | 39966 | CryptKicker | 37395 | Mokoa | 36499 | Chung Tran | 36100 | Still Looking | 35944 | Dr-epg | 34350 |
|
|
11-15-2012, 03:32 PM
|
#46
|
Premium Access
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 307
|
This is the only other I have of Michelle 34b that I can share Jokacz.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
11-15-2012, 03:54 PM
|
#47
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Dec 26, 2009
Location: Coaching The Track Team
Posts: 9,256
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tp273
This is the only other I have of Michelle 34b that I can share Jokacz.
|
Thanks :-)
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
11-15-2012, 04:44 PM
|
#48
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Dec 19, 2009
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 7,271
|
Am i the only one who's uncomfortable with the idea of posting pictures of ladies who:
A)Are no longer associated with the hobby. And...
B)May not want their prior participation in the hobby publicly displayed?
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
11-15-2012, 04:52 PM
|
#49
|
Premium Access
Join Date: Dec 17, 2009
Location: behind you
Posts: 8,583
|
I can understand your concern, but once something is posted on the internet, it is there forever. Anyone and EVERYONE who posts pics of ANY kind should be aware of that. Many websites archive everything, lets not forget individuals who save things also. Once something is made public, it is impossible to take it back and make it private.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
11-15-2012, 05:13 PM
|
#50
|
Backbencher
Join Date: Dec 17, 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 7,683
|
I see no issue with reposting any photo that can still be found online. It is debatable whether we should post a photo that does not exist online anymore.
|
|
Quote
 | 2 users liked this post
|
11-15-2012, 05:25 PM
|
#51
|
Premium Access
Join Date: Dec 17, 2009
Location: behind you
Posts: 8,583
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackfengshui
It is debatable whether we should post a photo that does not exist online anymore.
|
They ALL exists online. There are websites that archive the entire internet.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
11-15-2012, 05:29 PM
|
#52
|
Backbencher
Join Date: Dec 17, 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 7,683
|
I don't know how comprehensive the archiving sites are, but as I said, I see no issue with reposting any photo that can still be found online.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
11-15-2012, 05:42 PM
|
#53
|
Premium Access
Join Date: Dec 17, 2009
Location: behind you
Posts: 8,583
|
You said
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackfengshui
It is debatable whether we should post a photo that does not exist online anymore.
|
so I said
Quote:
Originally Posted by GP
They ALL exists online. There are websites that archive the entire internet.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackfengshui
I don't know how comprehensive the archiving sites are,
|
They are quite extensive.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
11-15-2012, 05:58 PM
|
#54
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 105
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doove
Am i the only one who's uncomfortable with the idea of posting pictures of ladies who:
A)Are no longer associated with the hobby. And...
B)May not want their prior participation in the hobby publicly displayed?
|
Nah I think it's pretty creepy myself. Yeah once something is out there on the internet, it's out there forever. But I know I would not want my participation in the hobby publicized, and if a girl moves on from this, it's pretty obvious they don't either. To me, there's no shortage of girls active in this now so I see no reason to hang on to someone that's left it behind.
But having said that, to each their own. I wouldn't tell anyone not to post anything.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
11-15-2012, 06:00 PM
|
#55
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Dec 19, 2009
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 7,271
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackfengshui
I don't know how comprehensive the archiving sites are, but as I said, I see no issue with reposting any photo that can still be found online.
|
That sounds reasonable enough on it's face, but what if a girl subsequently removes her pictures that are posted elsewhere in an effort to remove the public record of her being a provider? Not only does she have no ability to remove pictures posted here by you or I, there's also a good chance she won't even know she has pictures here that she'd like removed.
I would just prefer to err on the side of caution.
As to GP's point about archiving sites, i'm not 100% sure of what archiving sites do exactly. But i would think that someone finding a picture by looking deep into the weeds of an archiving site is far less likely than someone happening upon a picture posted on a publicly traveled site.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
11-15-2012, 06:02 PM
|
#56
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 4, 2010
Location: East Side of Rochester
Posts: 509
|
Any old pics of DaniGirl floating around?
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
11-15-2012, 06:09 PM
|
#57
|
Premium Access
Join Date: Dec 17, 2009
Location: behind you
Posts: 8,583
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doove
As to GP's point about archiving sites, i'm not 100% sure of what archiving sites do exactly. But i would think that someone finding a picture by looking deep into the weeds of an archiving site is far less likely than someone happening upon a picture posted on a publicly traveled site.
|
That is probably a fair enough assumption. But I also think if someone if suspicious and resourceful enough to be searching for information or pictures like we are talking about on a site like this, then they would be willing to also search an archive site as well. At least I know I would.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
11-15-2012, 06:15 PM
|
#58
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Dec 26, 2009
Location: Coaching The Track Team
Posts: 9,256
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackJedi
Any old pics of DaniGirl floating around?
|
There must be some, but she never showed her face.
Lovely body.
I was always curious about her ethnicity, "mixed" isn't very enlightening.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
11-15-2012, 06:24 PM
|
#59
|
Backbencher
Join Date: Dec 17, 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 7,683
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jokacz
I was always curious about her ethnicity, "mixed" isn't very enlightening.
|
I for one would not offer any info. Some ladies with mixed ethnicity are particularly vulnerable to being accidentally outed in their community by their particular ethnic combinations. Velvet Touch is another case in point.
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
11-15-2012, 06:55 PM
|
#60
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Dec 26, 2009
Location: Coaching The Track Team
Posts: 9,256
|
Velvet is "mixed"?
I thought she was pulling my leg. (not that one)
|
|
Quote
 | 1 user liked this post
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
Find Ladies |
Hot Women |
|