Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
Just like OJ was innocent of all charges, right, speedy? Intelligent people understand setting up a server to avoid the requirements of the FOIA is a nefarious circumvention of public law, speedy. Intelligent people know that having classified material stored at home on an unsecured server is a violation of government rules and regulations, speedy. Intelligent people know that anyone arguing that Hildebeest didn't "knowingly send, receive and store" classified material on an unsecured server is an outright lie, speedy, since she, in fact, knowingly set up the server for nefarious reasons in the first place. Odumbo has already demonstrated that he picks and chooses which laws he will enforce, speedy; so, you can just keep your head up his ass until you drown on his shit.
When Clinton is convicted of a crime regarding misuse of her server, you let me know. Until then, according to the U.S. justice system, she is innocent.
That's it? That's all you got? No link (or even the most sketchy of details) to a statement that you claim was 100% false, but links to two episodes that you admit are LESS than 100% false?
It appears there was at least a mini-scandal about what the Clintons took (or tried to take) with them when they left the White House back in 2001, wasn't there?
And there surely exists an actual video interview where Hillary admitted in a laughing manner that she defended a child rapist and won, right?
Perhaps both stories were embellished and distorted somewhat by her political enemies, but there certainly appears to be enough factual substance there to make the average American recoil in disgust.
And of course, you don't even question the dozens of other serious allegations against her, except to say you don't want to talk about them unless she is found guilty of something.
And you pretend to be even-handed in evaluating Trump versus Hillary?
You are free to interpret the links as you see fit. Yes, there was a "mini-scandal" as you put it. The Clintons were given gifts from others while in office. Some were personal gifts and some were gifts that were meant to stay in the White House after the Clintons left. The Clintons made restitution on everything in question. Case closed.
The second link is 40 years old. She got her client off, just as any lawyer would try to do. If she laughed about it, that would be somewhat reprehensible, depending on WHY she was laughing. The link opened with a lie and then became simply misleading.
What are the "dozens of serious allegations made against her"? I supplied one link in which the opinion of the writer was that no valid charges should be brought against Clinton for misuse of her server. There are other links that say she is guilty. Hopefully a court of law will determine her guilt or innocence. What dozens of others do you have?
When Clinton is convicted of a crime regarding misuse of her server, you let me know. Until then, according to the U.S. justice system, she is innocent.
Keep sucking (as in 'sucking chest wound'), speedy:
Keep sucking (as in 'sucking chest wound'), speedy:
When Clinton is convicted of a crime regarding misuse of her server, you let me know. Until then, according to the U.S. justice system, she is innocent.
What part of that do you not understand? You just continue to justify my opinion that you are, by far, the dumbest person on this board.
1 : to make an untrue statement with intent to deceive
2 : to create a false or misleading impression
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX
When Clinton is convicted of a crime regarding misuse of her server, you let me know. Until then, according to the U.S. justice system, she is innocent.
What part of that do you not understand? You just continue to justify my opinion that you are, by far, the dumbest person on this board.
You voted for Odumbo twice and you plan to vote for Hildebeest, speedy, that puts your IQ in the single digits.
1 : to make an untrue statement with intent to deceive
2 : to create a false or misleading impression
You voted for Odumbo twice and you plan to vote for Hildebeest, speedy, that puts your IQ in the single digits.
First, I'll match my IQ against your IQ any day of the year.
Second, please show me where I've said I am planning to vote for Clinton. You are an idiot because I've never said anything like that.
You don't believe anything I say and you don't believe anything anyone else says that differs with your "opinion". Which simply confirms my opinion that you are, by far, the dumbest person on this board.
Because an ignorant jackass like you wouldn't know how to look up the words for yourself, you Mussulman-luvin, Hitler worshipping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX
First, I'll match my IQ against your IQ any day of the year. You've been found wanting on numerous previous occasions, speedy.
Second, please show me where I've said I am planning to vote for Clinton. You are an idiot because I've never said anything like that. It's obvious from your putrid defense of Hildebeest, speedy.
You don't believe anything I say and you don't believe anything anyone else says that differs with your "opinion". Which simply confirms my opinion that you are, by far, the dumbest person on this board.
You voted for Odumbo twice and you plan to vote for Hildebeest, speedy, that puts your IQ in the single digits.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX
The fool is totally clueless in life.
You'd be the one defending the dim-retard under criminal investigation by the FBI, speedy.
I defend the U.S. judicial system, not Clinton. Or Trump. Idiot.
Again, please tell me where I've stated that I will vote for Clinton.
You've been defending Hildebeest all day long, speedy, and it's Odumbo that will block any action before it reaches the judicial system, speedy. That means if Hildebeest is elected, speedy, she will in all probability be the second Clinton and third president to be impeached, speedy. If Odumbo thwarts justice, Congress may be compelled to act, speedy.
