Breitbart News take on Trump's Afghanistan's policy... Just like Obamas'

[bambino]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

You "seem" them before your nurse puts them on, Mr. Morbid Obese?

Also, do your piggies have hooves?

What a fucking idiot you are! Can't even deliver an insult without fucking it up!

HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!

Really? Quick dumb pig, how many years between 1987 and 2017? I'll give you a hint, it's not 40. You can't do simple math you fucking stupid pig.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by bambino

You're simple minded. I'm not going to waste my time explaining it to you. Let's just say the Military knows it's very different.

One piece was headlined “His McMaster’s voice: Is Trump’s Afghanistan policy different from Obama?” It amounted to a twofer: Ripping national security adviser H.R. McMaster — a former Bannon rival — and likening Trump’s decisions to those of Obama.
Another article drilled down on similarities between the two presidents’ approaches in Afghanistan, contending that Trump “specifically echoed his predecessor’s 2009 speech, after acknowledging that the war had gone on too long.”
The piece’s author, Breitbart White House correspondent Charlie Spiering, noted in a tweet that both Trump and Obama also said their commitments would not amount to a “blank check.”

[bambino]

Originally Posted by WTF

One piece was headlined “His McMaster’s voice: Is Trump’s Afghanistan policy different from Obama?” It amounted to a twofer: Ripping national security adviser H.R. McMaster — a former Bannon rival — and likening Trump’s decisions to those of Obama.
Another article drilled down on similarities between the two presidents’ approaches in Afghanistan, contending that Trump “specifically echoed his predecessor’s 2009 speech, after acknowledging that the war had gone on too long.”
The piece’s author, Breitbart White House correspondent Charlie Spiering, noted in a tweet that both Trump and Obama also said their commitments would not amount to a “blank check.”

That's simplistic because you're a simpleton. Trump has delegated ROE to the people in the field. He isn't telegraphing when and where the US will attack. He did not give the enemy a timetable when we will pull out. He also put Pakistan on notice. You do know we give them billions in aide that's why they handed us UBL. Your a dumb cunt.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by bambino

That's simplistic because you're a simpleton. Trump has delegated ROE to the people in the field. He isn't telegraphing when and where the US will attack. He did not give the enemy a timetable when we will pull out. He also put Pakistan on notice. You do know we give them billions in aide that's why they handed us UBL. Your a dumb cunt.

They did not hand us UBL...unless of course you think the Navy Seals are lying.

The stupid Trumpster and his dickless followers are the only one's not aware of how many troops we are sending and the change in ROE.

If you think a simple change in ROE will win this war you're a bigger Perv than I ever thought.
You think Afghanistan is the next Japan

[bambino]

Originally Posted by WTF

They did not hand us UBL...unless of course you think the Navy Seals are lying.

The stupid Trumpster and his dickless followers are the only one's not aware of how many troops we are sending and the change in ROE.

If you think a simple change in ROE will win this war you're a bigger Perv than I ever thought.
You think Afghanistan is the next Japan

They didn't hand us UBL? Are you that stupid? He was a figurehead when we got him. He wasn't worth loosing the money we give those fucks. We flew over a military base you idiot. They didn't fire a shot. Was it a dangerous mission? Sure it was. WE crashed a helicopter. But when we got there, there wasn't any resistance. Only an idiot like you wouldn't think the Pakistanis didn't help.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by bambino

They didn't hand us UBL? Are you that stupid? He was a figurehead when we got him. He wasn't worth loosing the money we give those fucks. We flew over a military base you idiot. They didn't fire a shot. Was it a dangerous mission? Sure it was. WE crashed a helicopter. But when we got there, there wasn't any resistance. Only an idiot like you wouldn't think the Pakistanis didn't help.

http://foreignpolicy.com/2015/05/13/...seymour-hersh/


I suppose you want me to believe you're Seymour Hersh!

[garhkal]

Originally Posted by WTF

Trump will learn that wars are fought on two fronts, militarily and politically.


.

That they are. BUT when politics fail, you NEED a military option.
AND i am glad he said what he did about "we will no longer be in the business of nation building, NOR will we tell everyone what we are going to do, and when. We will tell you afterwards.."

[Guest050619-1]

<Bump>

[WTF]

Originally Posted by WTF

One piece was headlined “His McMaster’s voice: Is Trump’s Afghanistan policy different from Obama?” It amounted to a twofer: Ripping national security adviser H.R. McMaster — a former Bannon rival — and likening Trump’s decisions to those of Obama.
Another article drilled down on similarities between the two presidents’ approaches in Afghanistan, contending that Trump “specifically echoed his predecessor’s 2009 speech, after acknowledging that the war had gone on too long.”
The piece’s author, Breitbart White House correspondent Charlie Spiering, noted in a tweet that both Trump and Obama also said their commitments would not amount to a “blank check.”

Originally Posted by garhkal

That they are. BUT when politics fail, you NEED a military option.
AND i am glad he said what he did about "we will no longer be in the business of nation building, NOR will we tell everyone what we are going to do, and when. We will tell you afterwards.."

Trump is doing the same thing Obama was doing but saying he is not and your dumbass believes him.

[WTF]

Yep

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by WTF

Entirely up to the assholes in question.

LMAO!!!!!!