Has it now become acceptable to hijack threads (Guideline #6) with cases of unprovoked rudeness (Guideline #1) and disrespect of others (Guideline #3) with blatant insults or hostility (Guideline #4)? I thought the moderating staff were supposed to monitor the forums with the goal of threads on topic (Guideline #14). Are these Guidelines not in effect anymore? I understand the need for drama to keep the forums alive, but has it now become SOP to allow certain members to stalk (Guideline # 17) other member’s threads and posts in an attempt to either stir drama or derail a lady/ies business/es ?
Before someone get it in their head that I'm making this all about one or a few person/s, know that I'm not. This is supposed to be a place for ladies to advertise and market themselves. If it has now become the bastion of a few to attack any lady they deem unworthy or competition, then I think now is the time to say so and change the Guidelines to give new ladies the heads up on what to expect should they decide to join ECCIE and allow review here (Guideline #29).
This is the original post in Amy’s thread titled “Would I lose myself over a small detail?”
Quote:
Originally Posted by bustyamy
Friends tell me to go back to my natural hair color, dirty blonde/light brown with a touch of auburn. Would that affect who BA is.Take new pics, all reviews might be considered fake. I'm known for hair color as one of my main features, would it hurt my business?
|
It asks about her hair color and maintaining her following of clients. It isn’t hostile. It says nothing about her weight or her travels. It says nothing about anything other than her hair color and nothing negative at all.
Of the fifty-eight responses fifty-three were flirty fun and only four were negative. Those four responses are quoted below. They are all negative. They are all off topic. They are all hostile and meant to be blatant insults. They are all unprovoked and rude. And it’s obvious that Luxury Daphne follows BustyAmy’s posts around the board just to insult her which is cyberstalking. So, do we follow the rules or don’t we? And if we don’t, why not?
In the order of appearance:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luxury Daphne
Well she did go across the border and get surgery because wu called her a whale. So.. Yeah!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luxury Daphne
the timing, the reason behind it, and the subsequent bullshit behind it including the fake Dr profile behind it says otherwise...not on a gettin guys to fuck her basis; they were doing that anyhow/..
after whale wars alot of bitches changed horses midstride..
if you are ok with who you are.. nothing that anyone can say can change that.
like dh says.. you decide when to get on the wheel. but you don't decide when to get off..
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luxury Daphne
What no turd jokes today? I disappoint. 
No worries baby.. You'll always be my trailer trash wanderlust. �� Don't you ever change for anybody. |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luxury Daphne
next time keep the dress on tho. Taking it off didn't help your case any.
|
EDIT - My PM is starting to blow up with the theme of me defending BustyAmy. I am NOT defending Busty Amy. I am using THIS SPECIFIC example to demonstrate that the guidelines protecting posters and women adverting here from unwanted attacks from other posters aren't being enforced. This has nothing to do with the particular participants and everything to do with maintaining an environment where women can advertise and market and the men can further that marketing by writing reviews. THIS IS ABOUT CYBERBULLYING NOT THESE TWO INDIVIDUALS PERSONALLY.
Have we decided to forgo the rules in favor of hostility?
