Main Menu |
|
Most Favorited Images |
|
Recently Uploaded Images |
|
Most Liked Images |
|
Top Reviewers |
| cockalatte |
645 |
| MoneyManMatt |
490 |
| Still Looking |
399 |
| samcruz |
398 |
| Jon Bon |
385 |
| Harley Diablo |
370 |
| honest_abe |
362 |
| DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
| Chung Tran |
288 |
| lupegarland |
287 |
| nicemusic |
285 |
| You&Me |
281 |
| Starscream66 |
262 |
| sharkman29 |
250 |
| George Spelvin |
244 |
|
|
Top Posters |
| DallasRain | 70390 | | biomed1 | 60320 | | Yssup Rider | 59856 | | gman44 | 52869 | | LexusLover | 51038 | | WTF | 48267 | | offshoredrilling | 47441 | | pyramider | 46370 | | bambino | 40288 | | CryptKicker | 37064 | | Mokoa | 36485 | | Chung Tran | 36100 | | Still Looking | 35944 | | The_Waco_Kid | 35187 | | Mojojo | 33117 |
|
|
12-18-2010, 04:50 PM
|
#1
|
|
Premium Access
Join Date: Jul 19, 2010
Location: Southern USA
Posts: 696
|
Question about NY Upstate Forums
It seems like there's enough activity in each of the three cities (Buffalo, Syracuse, and Rochester) to warrant three different forums. I have to sort through by a search or just clicking through them to find the city I'm visiting. So, I'm just saying my desire to have the forum split into three, by location.
I don't know whether other people feel this way and how much work it would be to for the moderator or website to sort the reviews by the cities or start posting this way.
|
|
Quote
 | 2 users liked this post |
|
12-18-2010, 05:18 PM
|
#2
|
|
Backbencher
Join Date: Dec 17, 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 7,683
|
I could be wrong, but I think most people would prefer the status quo. People in Buffalo, Rochester and Syracuse feel connected, and many ladies routinely travel among all three cities. Besides, it is not difficult to search under each city's name.
|
|
|
Quote
| 3 users liked this post |
|
12-18-2010, 11:19 PM
|
#3
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 4, 2010
Location: The Great State of Ennui
Posts: 22,025
|
I agree Jack
|
|
|
Quote
| 3 users liked this post |
|
12-19-2010, 07:38 AM
|
#4
|
|
Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 14, 2010
Location: rochester
Posts: 601
|
Agreed.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
12-19-2010, 09:18 PM
|
#5
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: Upstate
Posts: 182
|
I agree with Jack. I prefer one forum for the three cities.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
12-19-2010, 09:52 PM
|
#6
|
|
Premium Access
Join Date: Jul 19, 2010
Location: Southern USA
Posts: 696
|
OK. Good to get people's opinions. I guess I'm in the minority.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
03-23-2011, 12:44 AM
|
#7
|
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Dec 20, 2010
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 79
|
as an agency who DOES travel from time to time I definitely like the fact that all three cities are combined... +1
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
03-23-2011, 08:40 AM
|
#8
|
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Dec 12, 2009
Location: near Lake Ontario
Posts: 47,441
|
Buffalo, Syracuse, and Rochester in one forum. Now east of Syracuse I could see.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
03-23-2011, 01:35 PM
|
#9
|
|
Lifer
Join Date: Aug 10, 2010
Location: Syracuse
Posts: 1,257
|
OSD, was the sauce simmering too much? Needed to stir the pot on this one again? Haha.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
03-23-2011, 04:24 PM
|
#10
|
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Nov 13, 2010
Location: new york state
Posts: 431
|
It would be nice if the control panel allowed for filtration of topics by geography, or even within category. Failing that, a bit more info on the summary screen so I can skip over topics (e.g. Buffalo reviews) that are f limited interest for me.
I do like the breadth of contributions from the wider area on the general discussion topics, so, if the choice was status quo vs subdivsion, I'm for the status quo.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post |
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
|
Find Ladies |
|
Hot Women |
|
