McCabe’s day of reckoning is coming.

[bambino]

This little vindictive prick has it coming to him.


https://spectator.org/the-real-andrew-mccabe/

[Munchmasterman]

Originally Posted by bambino

This little vindictive prick has it coming to him.


https://spectator.org/the-real-andrew-mccabe/

This article makes lots of accusations without links to back them up.
The following from the article shows the misrepresention and the irrelevance of some of the information presented.

"Or the delay may be due to the disintegrating probable cause for the FISA warrant, i.e., the apparently fictitious and uncorroborated Fusion GPS/Christopher Steele dossier of Clinton campaign funded opposition research. Team Mueller and Flynn’s lawyers entered into a confidentiality agreement under which the evidence to be produced by the government will be kept under seal save for its use in court. This means that Flynn’s lawyers are seeking further discovery, which presumably will include the FISA applications and orders. If in fact probable cause for the electronic interception of Flynn’s communications proves to be lacking, they could be suppressed and the case against Flynn would be over."

The FISA warrant used was a national security FISA warrant.
From the NYT,

"The questions about contacts between Mr. Trump’s circle and Russian officialshave revealed what both sides presumably knew, that American intelligence agencies closely track Mr. Kislyak’s movements and tap his phone calls Russian officials on Thursday expressed anger that their ambassador’s actions were being questioned and that some news reports suggested he might be an intelligence operative."

Add in the intelligence agencies tap the Russian's, amongst others, phone lines to a lack of sources to cast doubt over the claims made in the article.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

This article makes lots of accusations without links to back them up.
The following from the article shows the misrepresention and the irrelevance of some of the information presented.

"Or the delay may be due to the disintegrating probable cause for the FISA warrant, i.e., the apparently fictitious and uncorroborated Fusion GPS/Christopher Steele dossier of Clinton campaign funded opposition research. Team Mueller and Flynn’s lawyers entered into a confidentiality agreement under which the evidence to be produced by the government will be kept under seal save for its use in court. This means that Flynn’s lawyers are seeking further discovery, which presumably will include the FISA applications and orders. If in fact probable cause for the electronic interception of Flynn’s communications proves to be lacking, they could be suppressed and the case against Flynn would be over."

The FISA warrant used was a national security FISA warrant.
From the NYT,

"The questions about contacts between Mr. Trump’s circle and Russian officialshave revealed what both sides presumably knew, that American intelligence agencies closely track Mr. Kislyak’s movements and tap his phone calls Russian officials on Thursday expressed anger that their ambassador’s actions were being questioned and that some news reports suggested he might be an intelligence operative."

Add in the intelligence agencies tap the Russian's, amongst others, phone lines to a lack of sources to cast doubt over the claims made in the article.

your entire premise falls apart if the FISA warrants were based on a political opposition document, i.e. the Steele dossier. and it was and you know it. How any the players in this shell game like Comey, McCabe and others have testified under oath that the Steele dossier was the primary basis for them? all of them did.

No Steele Dossier, no FISA. why can't you understand that?

Trump has not pardoned Flynn yet because it's becoming increasingly clear his case was a hack job by McCabe, and now he's going to pay dearly for it. Do you really think Trump will pardon him?

BAHAAAA

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

you entire premise falls apart if the FISA warrants were based on a political opposition document, i.e. the Steele dossier. and it was and you know it. How any the players in this shell game like Comey, McCabe and others have testified under oath that the Steele dossier was the primary basis for them? all of them did.

No Steele Dossier, no FISA. why can't you understand that?

Trump has not pardoned Flynn yet because it's becoming increasingly clear his case was a hack job by McCabe, and now he's going to pay dearly for it. Do you really think Trump will pardon him?

BAHAAAA

Masterdickmuncher, and other dim-retards in this forum, doesn't understand that it's not what McCabe told the NYT happened that matters, it's what McCabe and his fellow desperadoes actually did that matters.

[Munchmasterman]

You don't even leave a smudge on my "premise" let alone making it fall apart.
I'll say this slow for you.

We legally tap the phones of our nation's enemies. We follow them to see
who they talk to, etc.

They're tapped because the Russians use them, not because a moron might call them (but it catches them too).

A national security FISA warrant was used to intercept flynn's call, not the "dossier FISA warrant" your unproven claim of invalidity.
If you can't understand that simple and obvious fact, what's left to discuss?

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

you entire premise falls apart if the FISA warrants were based on a political opposition document, i.e. the Steele dossier. and it was and you know it. How any the players in this shell game like Comey, McCabe and others have testified under oath that the Steele dossier was the primary basis for them? all of them did.

No Steele Dossier, no FISA. why can't you understand that?
Because it's not true.
What facts do you have to back up your statement?
I'm sure you understand why I want to see links and sources
Trump has not pardoned Flynn yet because it's becoming increasingly clear his case was a hack job by McCabe, and now he's going to pay dearly for it. Do you really think Trump will pardon him?

BAHAAAA

Do me a big favor.
Post a link quoting a single person in your "shell game" admitting under oath that the dossier was the primary basis for granting the warrant. It should be easy if it's as obvious as you say. Where did you read it?

On top of that, the warrants are renewed on the basis they are producing new intel. No new intel, no renewal.
Each renewal application contains more information than the one before it.

Parts of the dossier have been substantiated. Some parts are proven false. It was treated as an unsubstantiated tip and it was investigated.

Lots of good info on this link.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...=.297e933877a5

[Munchmasterman]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Masterdickmuncher, and other dim-retards in this forum, doesn't understand that it's not what McCabe told the NYT happened that matters, it's what McCabe and his fellow desperadoes actually did that matters.

I understand now.

It's not what you were told they did.
It's what they actually did.

So what proof do you have about what they actually did?

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

I understand now.

It's not what you were told they did.
It's what they actually did.

So what proof do you have about what they actually did?

Comey and McCabe are congenital liars, masterdickmuncher. hildebeest DID intentionally violate U.S. laws with her unauthorized and insecure server despite Comey's lies to the contrary, and McCabe was fired by the FBI for lying about talking to a reporter ... and maybe more, masterdickmuncher.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

This article makes lots of accusations without links to back them up.

Sounds like your posts, Munchie!

Has McCabe been reinstated yet?

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

So what proof do you have about what they actually did?

Paraphrase of Munchie on "Proof"!: The proof is there. It's an ongoing criminal investigation so the "proof" cannot be disclosed. So the "ongoing criminal investigation" is "PROOF" THAT THERE IS PROOF ... otherwise why would there be an investigation!!!!

Sound familiar, fool?

[nevergaveitathought]

whats with the always dumb demand for "links"???

like someone else's opinion is required to support my opinion?

its a facts and circumstances article with plausible wondering about things not yet disclosed publically

you mean "links" as in the FBI in the FISA warrant using a yahoo article planted by fusion gps to bolster the FBI use of the fusion gps report in the FISA warrant?

[WTF]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

A national security FISA warrant was used to intercept flynn's call, not the "dossier FISA warrant" your unproven claim of invalidity.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...=.297e933877a5

Do not confuse them with facts...

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

whats with the always dumb demand for "links"???

like someone else's opinion is required to support my opinion?

its a facts and circumstances article with plausible wondering about things not yet disclosed publically

you mean "links" as in the FBI in the FISA warrant using a yahoo article planted by fusion gps to bolster the FBI use of the fusion gps report in the FISA warrant?

Look bubba,if something is an fact, it is NOT open for interpretation. A spoon is not a fork, even if you opine otherwise,

The truth died in November 2016. Your ludicrous post is proof of the harm that event caused to our way of life.

Pull your head out of your ass.

[Guest123018-4]

He is the mastermanmuncher and he doesn't understand shit.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

You don't even leave a smudge on my "premise" let alone making it fall apart.
I'll say this slow for you.

We legally tap the phones of our nation's enemies. We follow them to see
who they talk to, etc.

They're tapped because the Russians use them, not because a moron might call them (but it catches them too).

A national security FISA warrant was used to intercept flynn's call, not the "dossier FISA warrant" your unproven claim of invalidity.
If you can't understand that simple and obvious fact, what's left to discuss?

Do me a big favor.
Post a link quoting a single person in your "shell game" admitting under oath that the dossier was the primary basis for granting the warrant. It should be easy if it's as obvious as you say. Where did you read it?

On top of that, the warrants are renewed on the basis they are producing new intel. No new intel, no renewal.
Each renewal application contains more information than the one before it.

Parts of the dossier have been substantiated. Some parts are proven false. It was treated as an unsubstantiated tip and it was investigated.

Lots of good info on this link.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...=.297e933877a5

what a shame i'll never read you "precious" link you keep yelling about. it's a pay-wall and i don't pay for pay-walls. so if you got a point you want to make post it from the article.


what happens to someone when they appear before a Judge and lie?

here's a link anyone can read because it's not behind a pay-wall. of course the source is completely unreliable .. bahahhaaaaaaa we all know that Forbes is a tabloid yeah??? baha


The Trump Dossier Is Fake -- And Here Are The Reasons Why

https://www.forbes.com/sites/paulrod.../#13f965d66867




read it and counter with whatever your WaPost has to say.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

A spoon is not a fork, even if you opine otherwise...

You sure about that, oinkboy?