4th Person ID'd By Accuser Repudiates Accuser's Story.

[I B Hankering]

Senate Judiciary Committee contacts Ford's friend about party

"Simply put," Walsh [lawyer for the 4th person: Ms. Keyser] said, "Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford."

The lawyer acknowledged to CNN that Keyser is a lifelong friend of Ford's.

Keyser is the latest person alleged to be at the party to say she has no recollection of it.


CNN

.

[The_Waco_Kid]

so .. the party that never happened. bahhahaaaa

[TheDaliLama]

Is there any one that confirm her story since Dr Ford can’t?

I bet the Dems will manufacture another alleged victim by next week.

And I’d bet that the Dems are even working on planting the seeds for every Judge on Trumps SC list.

They’ll be in full meltdown when RBG kicks the bucket.

[friendly fred]

Originally Posted by TheDaliLama

Is there any one that confirm her story since Dr Ford can’t?

I bet the Dems will manufacture another alleged victim by next week.

And I’d bet that the Dems are even working on planting the seeds for every Judge on Trumps SC list.

They’ll be in full meltdown when RBG kicks the bucket.

I will cheer as loudly at RBG's demise as the liberals did when Justice Scalia passed.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by friendly fred

I will cheer as loudly at RBG's demise as the liberals did when Justice Scalia passed.

when that hag dies we should all dance in the streets like those libtard brits did when Thatcher died. what fools. The "Iron Lady" saved the UK from a socialist meltdown and they danced when she died?



they should have held a parade.





bahahahahaa IDIOTS!

[garhkal]

So i wonder, with this new info coming out will Grassley grow a pair finally, and call for a bloody vote?

[bambino]

I’ve said all along Ford will not testify under oath.

[bb1961]

Originally Posted by bambino

I’ve said all along Ford will not testify under oath.

I don't understand SC says her "STORY" needs to be told??

[bambino]

Originally Posted by bb1961

I don't understand SC says her "STORY" needs to be told??

She doesn’t have a story. No where, no when, no forensics. She didn’t bring up Kavanaugh during her “counseling”. There are people who say this didn’t happen.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by bambino

I’ve said all along Ford will not testify under oath.

I agree with you, and I believe she won't testify at all.

Oath or not.

That's why she doesn't want lawyers to ask her questions. She wants to attempt to "show up" the conservatives on the Committee and, irrespective of her alleged claims as a "victim," her charade is ALL POLITICAL.

This reminds me of a "rape" trial a part of which I watched in San Antonio, including the final "arguments" to the jury. The short is: the victim lied. She was "getting back" at her ex-bf who married another "girl" who he got pregnant. The poor guy sat in jail for six months waiting for the trial during which time his wife had their baby. She sat in on the trial as well.

I knew one of the jurors well.

The allegation was he made the alleged "victim" give him a blow job at knife point, and then shredded her "night gown" with the knife. A Black woman on the jury made the comment when they went into the jury room for deliberations that NO ONE would make her get on her knees and suck their dick .. knife or not! That's a decent paraphrase of her statement. Within 10 minutes: Not guilty!

There's only one "victim" here ...

... Judge Kavanaugh. And more than one if you include his family!

The "U.S. Senator" from California, who refused to close the torture chambers in San Francisco after she bribed the gay community to vote for her, doesn't give a rat's ass about "victims" or she would have shut that shit down in S.F. in a heart beat. There's only one cunt worse than her right now ... HillariousNoMore and her "Great Right-wing Conspiracy" bullshit.

[Yssup Rider]

An awful lot of speculation here.

Maybe we should wait and see what happens.

She just might be telling the truth.

I know that’s a far fetched concept in today’s Bizzarro world, but I am convinced that most Americans believe in truth and fact.

[bb1961]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

An awful lot of speculation here.

Maybe we should wait and see what happens.

She just might be telling the truth.

Since she has a lot of witnesses to support her claims...

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

An awful lot of speculation here.

On her part as well.

She is "telling the truth" ....

.. she doesn't remember where, when, or how!

She just remembers the son of the judge who allowed the foreclosure on her parents' home to have done something to her, at some place, on some day 35 years ago!

For all those stupid people who claim the judicial committee hearing is not a "courtroom" so the evidence standards should be relaxed in order to allow the spurious defaming of a sitting appellate judge are full of shit.

As the saying goes: The shoe is on the other foot soon enough!

If the Liberals haven't learned that by now, that's proof they aren't as smart as they think and say they are!

HillariousNoMore hasn't and the "U.S. Senator" has been added to the list.

I'm actually embarrassed for the Republicans on the committee for allowing this lying POS and her shyster, whore lawyers to high-jack the Senate process with this bullshit. The decision should have been: Show up on Monday or shut up.

[Hotrod511]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

An awful lot of speculation here.

Maybe we should wait and see what happens.

She just might be telling the truth.

I know that’s a far fetched concept in today’s Bizzarro world, but I am convinced that most dim-retards believe in lies and bullshit.

Originally Posted by LexusLover

On her part as well.

She is "telling the truth" ....

.. she doesn't remember where, when, or how!

She just remembers the son of the judge who allowed the foreclosure on her parents' home to have done something to her, at some place, on some day 35 years ago!

For all those stupid people who claim the judicial committee hearing is not a "courtroom" so the evidence standards should be relaxed in order to allow the spurious defaming of a sitting appellate judge are full of shit.

As the saying goes: The shoe is on the other foot soon enough!

If the Liberals haven't learned that by now, that's proof they aren't as smart as they think and say they are!

HillariousNoMore hasn't and the "U.S. Senator" has been added to the list.

I'm actually embarrassed for the Republicans on the committee for allowing this lying POS and her shyster, whore lawyers to high-jack the Senate process with this bullshit. The decision should have been: Show up on Monday or shut up.

I agree

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by Hotrod511

I agree

The sad and ridiculous "point" of this charade is that after the so-called "hearing" the same people who believe her today will still believe her and the same folks who believe the Judge will still believe him. It will have accomplished NOTHING but simply further delayed the process in hopes that a decent, quality nominee will withdraw his nomination or the Dems will win control of the Senate and they can further engage in dilatory tactics to frustrate the agenda of the current administration.....

... which includes to start covering up the cat shit in their litter box called "D.C." That's their only hope for any appearance of a future in "government service" and nursing on the taxpayers' tit! It's no longer "public service," because "the public" is fed up with their bullshit and pissing off taxpayers' money while plotting to overthrow the government.