How do you like your dictatorship so far?

[JD Barleycorn]

Admittedly the Obama dictatorship is a strange hybrid one. It is elected like Hitler was and it could be unelected out of office but in the meantime Dictator Obama has threatened (promised) to nullify years of laws passed by the representatives of the people on immigration and border security. This of course sets a precedent that all Obama supporters should be scared of. A republican would be able to do the same thing on say gay marriage, or medical pot, or maybe criminal gangs with the support or vote congress. I know, I know, your goal is to change the make up of the country so much that there is never another GOP president. Dictatorship, like I said. Just like a communist dictatorship gets to vote in elections (fair and legal of course) the choices are all the same; communist A, communist B, or communist C. That is the future of this country under an Obama dictatorship; socialist democrat A, socialist democrat B, or socialist democrat C. How does it feel lefties to be in the same philosophical camp as those who put Hitler in power and instead of removing him, supported him based on lies and the fear of accepting that you made a mistake of judgement that we will all pay for?

Without any congressional oversight or approval Obama is now floating (this was predicted) that we need to not only give amnesty to the children flooding out borders but their parents now. After amnesty comes citizenship. Of course the diseases are thrown in for free as are the violent gangs, narco terrorism, and millions more being added to the social safety net which is starting to sag around the edges. If I was a black person in this country, make that a free thinking black person I would be scared. Who needs the black vote when you can just dispense some more latino vote like a cheap beer on tap? Maybe I should say cerveza.

Of course there are problems. Since Ted Kennedy pushed legislation that started the run for the border back in the 60s the democratic party still had their Kennedys, Pelosi, Schumers, and Frankens. What happens when the new arrivals think that they representative should be named Hernandez, Auguillar, or Ramos? Good bye old democrat dinosaurs. Ted Kennedy got away with by it dying (none too soon). I'm sure that EVA and Tampon are ready to push that button that says "english" as spanish will be the new default.

[i'va biggen]

Snort !!!

[JD Barleycorn]

I told someone here that an idiotic comment would probably the result. Thanks for proving me right EVA.....and proving yourself an idiot.

[Jewish Lawyer]

from JD Barleycorn

"Of course there are problems. Since Ted Kennedy pushed legislation that started the run for the border back in the 60s the democratic party still had their Kennedys, Pelosi, Schumers, and Frankens. What happens when the new arrivals think that they representative should be named Hernandez, Auguillar, or Ramos? Good bye old democrat dinosaurs. Ted Kennedy got away with by it dying (none too soon). I'm sure that EVA and Tampon are ready to push that button that says "english" as spanish will be the new default."

I'm looking forward to the asshole liberals getting killed by their own creation - multiculturalism.
Fuck you liberals!!!

[wellendowed1911]

Funny because history shows that the U.S govt expanded more under Bush than any other President and your constitutional rights were violated more so under Bush than any other President all under the mask of fighting terrorism. However I didn't hear a peep from the republicans or tea party- I wonder why? Maybe because Bush had the right skin color- it just when a guy with a funny name and a darker skin tone does something do people complain

[CuteOldGuy]

Originally Posted by wellendowed1911

Funny because history shows that the U.S govt expanded more under Bush than any other President and your constitutional rights were violated more so under Bush than any other President all under the mask of fighting terrorism. However I didn't hear a peep from the republicans or tea party- I wonder why? Maybe because Bush had the right skin color- it just when a guy with a funny name and a darker skin tone does something do people complain

Even if that's true, why do we have to allow Obama to continue down the same road? I don't give a damn what color a tyrant is. I won't support him/het!

And Bush should be in prison. No doubt. And even if groups want to worship Bush, right thinking people need to oppose tyranny no matter what color the perp is, and regardless of party.

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

I told someone here that an idiotic comment would probably the result. Thanks for proving me right EVA.....and proving yourself an idiot.

Your hero passed the bill on 2000 and 2008 that you are blaming Obie for, who is the idiot?

[cowboy8055]

Bush had a lot to do with this trend towards dictatorial government.
Obama has added to it. Not exactly what he campaigned on.
http://www.salon.com/2013/12/27/obam...ntion_remains/

[CuteOldGuy]

If Obama had kept his promises he made in the 2008 campaign, he would be almost universally hailed as the greatest President ever. Instead, he lied, and now surpasses Carter for incompetence, and Nixon for corruption. What a disappointment.

[JD Barleycorn]

Originally Posted by wellendowed1911

Funny because history shows that the U.S govt expanded more under Bush than any other President and your constitutional rights were violated more so under Bush than any other President all under the mask of fighting terrorism. However I didn't hear a peep from the republicans or tea party- I wonder why? Maybe because Bush had the right skin color- it just when a guy with a funny name and a darker skin tone does something do people complain

What can I say? Too stupid to live I guess. History? You're talking about history? This post is not about the expansion of government, this is about one man deciding that he, and he alone, is going to rule this country. The Constitution is very clear about which branch has what responsibility and Obama is usurping the authority of the legislative branch to make law or, as the case may be, ignore standing law. You would like to think this is about skin color but that makes your support of the dictator a good thing because you must not be a racist. What it does is makes you a piss poor American citizen (and Obama is half white you shit heel and I oppose anyone who tries to steal my country black, white, yellow, brown, or tutti-frutti) and it makes you a racist wee-wee. You are supporting someone just because of their skin color. You are a fool, a racist, and a piss poor American. The trifecta of shame. There you go wee-wee.

If I must point out the obvious; when Bush (George W.) proposed amnesty who stopped him? It was the forerunner of the Tea party or people who think the Constitution matters. You'd better pull your racist head out of your racist ass and see the future.

[JD Barleycorn]

Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Your hero passed the bill on 2000 and 2008 that you are blaming Obie for, who is the idiot?

Okay shit for brains; a question and a factoid. What bill are you talking about? And Clinton was president in 2000. Bush did not take office until 2001. You should feel very stupid. Especially when you find out that bill did not come from Bush but from the democratically controlled Congress. Also answer what happened to the fence in the bill.

So in answer to your question; if you have a mirror, you're looking at the idiot.

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Okay shit for brains; a question and a factoid. What bill are you talking about? And Clinton was president in 2000. Bush did not take office until 2001. You should feel very stupid. Especially when you find out that bill did not come from Bush but from the democratically controlled Congress. Also answer what happened to the fence in the bill.

So in answer to your question; if you have a mirror, you're looking at the idiot.

I just changed it a little like you do Judy. The democrats controlled congress in 2000?

[JD Barleycorn]

What was the 2000 bill that was presented to Clinton (that you mistake for Bush).
Or is this a bald faced lie? Congress has two houses. The Senate was in the hands of the GOP and Al Gore (a democrat) was it's master in 2000. The House was in the hands of the GOP with a razor thin margin. I made a mistake by looking at the wrong year myself but does this have to do with Bush in 2000? It has nothing to do with Bush so what is EVA pissing himself about?
You still haven't answered the other question so I have to assume that I'm right on that.

[Jewish Lawyer]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

If Obama had kept his promises he made in the 2008 campaign, he would be almost universally hailed as the greatest President ever. Instead, he lied, and now surpasses Carter for incompetence, and Nixon for corruption. What a disappointment.

I agree - he is a major disappointment. Unfortunately, we are stuck with him for another two years. Fortunately, we have alcohol and hookers, and in some cases for you fat fucks, food for comfort.

[Jackie S]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

If Obama had kept his promises he made in the 2008 campaign, he would be almost universally hailed as the greatest President ever. Instead, he lied, and now surpasses Carter for incompetence, and Nixon for corruption. What a disappointment.

The reason he could never live up to the hype is because he is nothing more than a Demagogue.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/demagogue

The Demagogue knows how to win elections, usually through the means of superior speaking ability, (or in this case, TelePrompter reading), but then has no clue how to Govern once in power.

That is why he just keeps campaigning, ie, going to fund raising events rather than addressing the myriad of problems that this Country faces. He does not have a clue how to do anything else. All he knows to do is just keep feeding the mob.

I think you are right about the Democrats. We are going through a "mini version" of this right now in East Houston. Certain small towns, (Galena Park, Jacinto City, South Houston, etc), have seen a huge influx of Hispanics, and unless you have a Latin surname, you are not getting elected to anything.

All are historically Democrat strongholds.

What amazes me is how some of the seemingly intelligent men on Web Sites such as this can't see past this entire charade.