Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 645
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 398
Jon Bon 385
Harley Diablo 370
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 262
sharkman29 250
George Spelvin 244
Top Posters
DallasRain70383
biomed160296
Yssup Rider59847
gman4452865
LexusLover51038
WTF48267
offshoredrilling47428
pyramider46370
bambino40275
CryptKicker37064
Mokoa36485
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
The_Waco_Kid35149
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-23-2019, 07:26 AM   #151
Levianon17
Valued Poster
 
Levianon17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2019
Location: In the valley
Posts: 10,238
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by themystic View Post
Judge Napolitano: Robert Mueller ‘Would Have Indicted ...
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile...ler-would-have...

In an interview with Stuart Varney, Napolitano reiterated his previously stated conclusion that Mueller believed President Donald Trump had committed a crime and only did not indict him because of procedural restraints against indicting a sitting president.
If they won't prosecute because Trump is a sitting President then the whole investigation was for nothing. It's more about character assassination than investigating a crime.
Levianon17 is offline   Quote
Old 09-23-2019, 07:50 AM   #152
bambino
Valued Poster
 
bambino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 7, 2010
Location: Dive Bar
Posts: 40,275
Encounters: 29
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by themystic View Post
Judge Napolitano: Robert Mueller ‘Would Have Indicted ...
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile...ler-would-have...

In an interview with Stuart Varney, Napolitano reiterated his previously stated conclusion that Mueller believed President Donald Trump had committed a crime and only did not indict him because of procedural restraints against indicting a sitting president.
Judge Munster is usually wrong in his conclusions.
bambino is offline   Quote
Old 09-23-2019, 08:31 AM   #153
Jaxson66
Valued Poster
 
Jaxson66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 17, 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,283
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bambino View Post
Are you still stuck in volume II of the Mueller report? Even he has moved on.
Actually I’m thinking that the quickest and cleanest impeachment of that fat lying bastard is the extortion of the Ukrainian government by the fat lying bastard and his personal attorney.

All the remaining unanswered questions about the most corrupt administration in modern history can wait.

So I guess I’m moving on also
Jaxson66 is offline   Quote
Old 09-23-2019, 08:37 AM   #154
Jaxson66
Valued Poster
 
Jaxson66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 17, 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,283
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad View Post
Gotta link for that, jaxboy? I just googled "former federal prosecutors articles of impeachment" and couldn't find the 3 Articles you posted here. If you're not being stupid and making all of this up, then give us a fucking link!

You're obviously not capable of reading or comprehending what you posted sufficiently to explain why your Article III is an exact duplicate of your Article I.

So just post the fucking link and I'll see if I can figure things out for you.
You seem to be under the impression I owe you something...

Here’s your link goofukYa Self. loser.net
Jaxson66 is offline   Quote
Old 09-23-2019, 08:48 AM   #155
Jaxson66
Valued Poster
 
Jaxson66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 17, 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,283
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
The vast majority of your so-called "ex-federal prosecutors" are dim-retards, and many of those have direct ties to hildebeest and Odumbo, and a few are on Soros' payroll. All you have is a tainted sack of shit: turds connected to hildebeest, Odumbo and Soros who have no independent thought and only foment discord and the dim party agenda.

That’s not reality IB, that’s deep state conspiracy lies. The trump party best concentrate on the new crime of extortion or bribery. It ain’t going away!
Jaxson66 is offline   Quote
Old 09-23-2019, 08:59 AM   #156
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaxson66 View Post
Actually I’m thinking that the quickest and cleanest impeachment of that fat lying bastard is the extortion of the Ukrainian government by the fat lying bastard and his personal attorney.

All the remaining unanswered questions about the most corrupt administration in modern history can wait.

So I guess I’m moving on also
The only jackass on record as "extorting" Ukraine for a quid pro quo exchange is your clown Biden. The Ukrainian ambassador has let it publicly be known that Trump extorted nothing. Your "beliefs" are delusional.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXA--dj2-CY&feature
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 09-23-2019, 09:13 AM   #157
Jaxson66
Valued Poster
 
Jaxson66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 17, 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,283
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
The only jackass on record as "extorting" Ukraine for a quid pro quo exchange is your clown Biden. The Ukrainian ambassador has let it publicly be known that Trump extorted nothing. Your "beliefs" are delusional.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXA--dj2-CY&feature

Reuters has not confirmed details of the whistleblower’s complaint. But a source familiar with the matter said it alleged “multiple acts” by Trump, not just a phone call with a foreign leader. The source requested anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue.

Simple solution, take the manuscript to the House intelligence committee. If the fat lying bastard is innocent of any wrongdoing he should be happy to exonerate
himself. Unlike Mueller.
Jaxson66 is offline   Quote
Old 09-23-2019, 09:19 AM   #158
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaxson66 View Post
Reuters has not confirmed details of the whistleblower’s complaint. But a source familiar with the matter said it alleged “multiple acts” by Trump, not just a phone call with a foreign leader. The source requested anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue.

Simple solution, take the manuscript to the House intelligence committee. If the fat lying bastard is innocent of any wrongdoing he should be happy to exonerate
himself. Unlike Mueller.
You and your sources are bogus. There is no "original" source. All of this bullshit is speculative, hearsay, and the Ukrainian ambassador has stated publicly that anything about "pressure" being applied is a bullshit story. Meanwhile, your boy Biden ADMITTED he extorted the Ukrainians in a quid pro quo exchange.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 09-23-2019, 09:20 AM   #159
lustylad
BANNED
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,426
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaxson66 View Post
You seem to be under the impression I owe you something...

Here’s your link goofukYa Self. loser.net
Who said you "owe" me anything, jaxboy?

I don't care if you would rather look stupid to everyone in this forum who was ever tempted to take your bullshit seriously. My mistake was in thinking you might actually NOT want to look stupid.

Here's a suggestion - take your frivolous Article I and copy-paste it 9 more times. Then change the headings on each page to Article II, Article III, etc.... all the way up to Article X. (I'm assuming you know how to count to 10 using Roman numerals.) Then presto! You've multiplied one bogus Article of Impeachment ten-fold! Without having to strain your meager little brain trying to dream up new "reasons" to impeach trumpy!

I'm sure nobody here will notice your clever little trick, jaxboy. Chances are we will all be persuaded by the sheer immensity of your case against trumpy. What the fuck, maybe you should crank out 50 or 100 so-called Articles of Impeachment. Nobody will notice that they're all identical!

BAAAHAHAHAHAHA!!

Congratulations! You are now the Forrest Gump of eccie. Without the wisdom.



lustylad is offline   Quote
Old 09-23-2019, 09:50 AM   #160
lustylad
BANNED
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,426
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaxson66 View Post
Simple solution, take the manuscript to the House intelligence committee...
Sorry Forrest, there is no "manuscript".

Do you even know the difference between manuscript and transcript?
lustylad is offline   Quote
Old 09-23-2019, 09:59 AM   #161
themystic
Valued Poster
 
themystic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 13, 2009
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 7,373
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bambino View Post
Judge Munster is usually wrong in his conclusions.
maybe so but not on this one, trump was individual one in the crime Cohen is in prison for
themystic is offline   Quote
Old 09-23-2019, 10:08 AM   #162
lustylad
BANNED
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,426
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by themystic View Post
maybe so but not on this one, trump was individual one in the crime Cohen is in prison for
Which crime is that?

It's not a crime to use personal funds to avoid disclosures that are hurtful and embarrassing to your wife and family. Not even close.

If it bothers you that trumpy fucked a porn star and a playmate then feel free to vote him out in 2020. Pushing the impeachment charade only makes it less likely that will happen.
lustylad is offline   Quote
Old 09-23-2019, 10:13 AM   #163
themystic
Valued Poster
 
themystic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 13, 2009
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 7,373
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad View Post
Which crime is that?

It's not a crime to use personal funds to avoid disclosures that are hurtful and embarrassing to your wife and family. Not even close.
whatever you say. explain it to your grandkids
themystic is offline   Quote
Old 09-23-2019, 10:16 AM   #164
bambino
Valued Poster
 
bambino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 7, 2010
Location: Dive Bar
Posts: 40,275
Encounters: 29
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by themystic View Post
whatever you say. explain it to your grandkids
He already did. And they’re smarter than you.
bambino is offline   Quote
Old 09-23-2019, 10:17 AM   #165
lustylad
BANNED
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,426
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by themystic View Post
whatever you say. explain it to your grandkids
Again, if it bothers you that trumpy fucked a porn star and a playmate then feel free to vote him out in 2020. Pushing the impeachment charade only makes it less likely that will happen.
lustylad is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved