Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

LexusLover · 11-03-2018, 10:00 AM

I can imagine (from history) that posting a post that got points will get more points for reposting the pointable thread!

So, is that your ploy with this thread? To get folks more points? Diabolical if it is.

WTF · 11-03-2018, 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LexusLover

I can imagine (from history) that posting a post that got points will get more points for reposting the pointable thread!

So, is that your ploy with this thread? To get folks more points? Diabolical if it is.

There is nothing aganist the rules linking to a post from which you were pointed or warned. The Mods will have already deleted the offending parts.

So no this is not a trick.

I posted a link, Jackie posted a link....i think I B posted a link.

You can not post the pm you have gotten from the Mod but you can post a link to a post you wete pointed from.

It is a good learning tool....and it appears with the stats wakeup posted with all the RTM's, Lord knows some of you need it!

Yssup Rider · 11-03-2018, 11:13 AM

Diabolical!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

TheDaliLama · 11-03-2018, 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tonyvicksa

I said libtards

You said “YOU libtards” lol

LexusLover · 11-03-2018, 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WTF

There is nothing aganist the rules linking to a post from which you were pointed or warned. The Mods will have already deleted the offending parts.

Sorry, you are mistaken.

If the "mods" have stricken out the offending language, then how is one to know what the offense was that resulted in the points if they can't see the "offending language"? And that's not a trick question!!! But it is a rhetorical one.

How did Lama know what was posted if the mods struck the language?

Also, just like the reviews on the site. How can one rely on the accuracy of the words (Lama just pointed out such a flaw) restated without seeing the actual words posted that drew the ire of the mods ...or at least got their attention. Paraphrasing doesn't cut it.

So, I have to assume the ulterior motive of the thread as I described.

Yssup Rider · 11-04-2018, 08:01 AM

And you know what happens when you “assume,” LL.

WTF · 11-04-2018, 08:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Sorry, you are mistaken.

If the "mods" have stricken out the offending language, then how is one to know what the offense was that resulted in the points if they can't see the "offending language"? And that's not a trick question!!! But it is a rhetorical one.

.

You seem to be mistaken.

I adked to provide the link in which you were pointed so folks can view , in context, what went down.

In my case regarding points , I described the offending picture. Respectfully.

Another Mod, not wu, point me 5 for reposting a picture basically say fuck you. He mistakenly thought I was posting that towards wu. I was not.

So you are incorrect in your assumption of me trying to get other posters pointed.

Maybe you should start a thread asking who RTM other posters. That is a much better indicator of who is trying to get whom pointed.

The only post I have RTM'd id the points pm I got from the Mod not associated with this forum.

Can you say the same? Although as much as we disagree, I do not see you as a RTM kinda guy. RTM btw are actually fine by me, they are part of the rules. I think some poster may overuse that function.

I'm never offended , so I never use that feature. I used it on the Mod hoping to get a reply back from the Staff. Never heard a word from my RTM.

dilbert firestorm · 11-04-2018, 06:06 PM

wake up I know you are reading this.

when are you going to answer the questions I sent to you in the mail? I've been patient for 2 weeks for a reply.

The_Waco_Kid · 11-04-2018, 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

wake up I know you are reading this.

when are you going to answer the questions I sent to you in the mail? I've been patient for 2 weeks for a reply.

i'm going out on a limb but i think no reply is forthcoming.

Wakeup · 11-04-2018, 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

when are you going to answer the questions I sent to you in the mail? I've been patient for 2 weeks for a reply.

I don’t have any email from you. What address did you send it to?

iffy · 11-04-2018, 10:45 PM

.

WTF · 11-05-2018, 05:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jackie S

I was warned on this. Post #6.

https://www.eccie.net/showthread.php...post1061015252

I was warned also for calling an idiotic post , idiotic , the rules in here according to wu seems to be that is the same as calling the poster an idiot. Which is a no no here.

While I agree that it is a precursor to determining if a poster is a political idiot, one post does not beget an idiot just as one ruling does not. But it is something one should keep an eye out for but in this forum, one should keep that opinion to oneself.

So my point of this thread was to clear up what some to consider to be wu's murky posting rules.

This is a start.

What many in this forum need to learn to accept is no matter how idiotic one thinks of something , one needs to keep that to themselves unkess you want wu sending you a warning.

Which is all we can ask for....clarity and an even handed distribution of the rules.

Unless we find out that a rule does not have to be ckear nor even handed.

At least you then have that knowledge before posting in this forum!

WTF · 11-06-2018, 01:42 PM

Opps...got another warning boys and girls, thread hijacking, there seems to be a ton of that happening.

I'll post the link for educational purposes later.

Budman · 11-06-2018, 02:19 PM

The new rules suck.

Austin Ellen · 11-06-2018, 03:05 PM

Yea well, don't feel like the Lone Ranger there - me too - thread hijacking. I'm sure Yssup will be over the moon with joy.

Quote:

Originally Posted by WTF

Opps...got another warning boys and girls, thread hijacking, there seems to be a ton of that happening.

I'll post the link for educational purposes later.